The Joker, Incels, Threats And FBI Warnings

[Keith&Co.]

Except that money actually exists, 'wealthy people' are not artifacts of 'Leftists' mythology, and they really do have billions, and you, or I, or anyone can SEND money to someone without it being trafficking, so, no, i still do not see the two as remotely comparable except in the minds of incels and anyone else who sees women as a commodity.

Do you see women as a commodity, Half?

No, they are not a commodity. But, the incels think they are.

which is why we make fun of incels, and tgat does not compate to taxing the rich.

The point is that if you think stealing money from the rich to give to the poor is OK, then you should also think stealing women is OK to give to the incels.

no.
No, that is still an insane, misogynistic stance.

Both involve stealing something that isn't yours without regard to the person's feelings.

feelings? For taxes? What the fuck are you on about?

 

[Cheerful Charlie]

Productivity grows but wages do not. The top 10%, the managerial class, who control wages and CEO salaries, make sure wages don't grow while they make out like bandits. "Look more money to divide up! One for me. None for you. One for me. None for you."

Do you want to talk about theft and the American people? Really? And this crap will continue as long as the GOP rules anything.

 

[ronburgundy]

Except that money actually exists, 'wealthy people' are not artifacts of 'Leftists' mythology, and they really do have billions, and you, or I, or anyone can SEND money to someone without it being trafficking, so, no, i still do not see the two as remotely comparable except in the minds of incels and anyone else who sees women as a commodity.

Do you see women as a commodity, Half?

No, they are not a commodity. But, the incels think they are.

The point is that if you think stealing money from the rich to give to the poor is OK, then you should also think stealing women is OK to give to the incels. Both involve stealing something that isn't yours without regard to the person's feelings.

No, one involves the presumption that a human being can be owned and thus "transferred" from one person to another, and the other involves the notion that only inanimate objects (like $) can be owned and thus "transferred". The fact that you still can't grasp this after multiple attempts to explain it to you proves that you view women as objects that can be owned.

 

[ronburgundy]

I have high hopes for "The Joker". Ledger set a pretty high bar, but I think Phoenix has a good chance to pull it off, and I dig the dark vibe the trailers give off.

I'm not gonna let some Jordan Peterson fanboys ruin it for me.

 

[repoman]

I have high hopes for "The Joker". Ledger set a pretty high bar, but I think Phoenix has a good chance to pull it off, and I dig the dark vibe the trailers give off.

I'm not gonna let some Jordan Peterson fanboys ruin it for me.

Clean your room, Bucko!

Also, are you interested in Peterson designed rugs?

 

[Half-Life]

Except that money actually exists, 'wealthy people' are not artifacts of 'Leftists' mythology, and they really do have billions, and you, or I, or anyone can SEND money to someone without it being trafficking, so, no, i still do not see the two as remotely comparable except in the minds of incels and anyone else who sees women as a commodity.

Do you see women as a commodity, Half?

No, they are not a commodity. But, the incels think they are.

The point is that if you think stealing money from the rich to give to the poor is OK, then you should also think stealing women is OK to give to the incels. Both involve stealing something that isn't yours without regard to the person's feelings.

No, one involves the presumption that a human being can be owned and thus "transferred" from one person to another, and the other involves the notion that only inanimate objects (like $) can be owned and thus "transferred". The fact that you still can't grasp this after multiple attempts to explain it to you proves that you view women as objects that can be owned.

I do not think it is OK. I am saying the incels do. Stealing women (who don't want to be stolen) and stealing money (from people who don't want it stolen) are both disgusting acts.

As I stated in post #39 that went unrefuted:

Taxes for the sole purpose of stealing from the rich to give away to the poor is completely different. The poor simultaneously hate billionaires and also want to leech off of their wealth. I was chatting with a lefty and I told them that if we start taxing the wealthy they will move their businesses to other countries and this will kill jobs for the middle class and the poor and destroy any potential for job growth. He replied, "Well, then just don't tax the corporations that much" and I said, "Welcome to the Republican party!"

 

[ronburgundy]

No, one involves the presumption that a human being can be owned and thus "transferred" from one person to another, and the other involves the notion that only inanimate objects (like $) can be owned and thus "transferred". The fact that you still can't grasp this after multiple attempts to explain it to you proves that you view women as objects that can be owned.

I do not think it is OK. I am saying the incels do. Stealing women (who don't want to be stolen) and stealing money (from people who don't want it stolen) are both disgusting acts.

As I stated in post #39 that went unrefuted:

Taxes for the sole purpose of stealing from the rich to give away to the poor is completely different. The poor simultaneously hate billionaires and also want to leech off of their wealth. I was chatting with a lefty and I told them that if we start taxing the wealthy they will move their businesses to other countries and this will kill jobs for the middle class and the poor and destroy any potential for job growth. He replied, "Well, then just don't tax the corporations that much" and I said, "Welcome to the Republican party!"

It was refuted definitively with the fact that women are not inanimate object while dollars are. That makes all the difference in any effort to transfer ownership of them.

"Taxing is theft" is not a fact, it is your wrong opinion based on your ignorant assumption that all wealth is generated solely by the actions of the individual who is in possession of it, with zero dependence or impact upon anyone else. Since those assumptions are objectively false, it is objectively false that "taxing is theft".

 

[Half-Life]

It was refuted definitively with the fact that women are not inanimate object while dollars are. That makes all the difference in any effort to transfer ownership of them.

"Taxing is theft" is not a fact, it is your wrong opinion based on your ignorant assumption that all wealth is generated solely by the actions of the individual who is in possession of it, with zero dependence or impact upon anyone else. Since those assumptions are objectively false, it is objectively false that "taxing is theft".

Leftists: "We did it! We are taxing the corporations and the wealthy!......wait a minute!....Why are prices going up and why are jobs being lost?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Well you see, the government is stealing money from them so they have to make up for it by cutting jobs and increasing prices in order to make the money back that they lost to the government. It might get so bad that all these people will close up shop and move to other countries."

Leftists: "This is so stupid! Why don't we just give them a tax break so this disaster can stop?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Welcome to the Republican party! The party of the working class! You can see the Democrats want to destroy the working class!"

 

[Fentoine Lum]

View attachment 24102

Productivity grows but wages do not. The top 10%, the managerial class, who control wages and CEO salaries, make sure wages don't grow while they make out like bandits. "Look more money to divide up! One for me. None for you. One for me. None for you."

Do you want to talk about theft and the American people? Really? And this crap will continue as long as the GOP rules anything.

And we're half a century into this now.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

It was refuted definitively with the fact that women are not inanimate object while dollars are. That makes all the difference in any effort to transfer ownership of them.

"Taxing is theft" is not a fact, it is your wrong opinion based on your ignorant assumption that all wealth is generated solely by the actions of the individual who is in possession of it, with zero dependence or impact upon anyone else. Since those assumptions are objectively false, it is objectively false that "taxing is theft".

Leftists: "We did it! We are taxing the corporations and the wealthy!......wait a minute!....Why are prices going up and why are jobs being lost?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Well you see, the government is stealing money from them so they have to make up for it by cutting jobs and increasing prices in order to make the money back that they lost to the government. It might get so bad that all these people will close up shop and move to other countries."

Leftists: "This is so stupid! Why don't we just give them a tax break so this disaster can stop?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Welcome to the Republican party! The party of the working class! You can see the Democrats want to destroy the working class!"

Yup, Bill Clinton and the party decided all the politicos should grovel to the donor class, and the liberal class turned its back on workers to join that "other" party to redistribute societal wealth to the top.

 

[ronburgundy]

It was refuted definitively with the fact that women are not inanimate object while dollars are. That makes all the difference in any effort to transfer ownership of them.

"Taxing is theft" is not a fact, it is your wrong opinion based on your ignorant assumption that all wealth is generated solely by the actions of the individual who is in possession of it, with zero dependence or impact upon anyone else. Since those assumptions are objectively false, it is objectively false that "taxing is theft".

Leftists: "We did it! We are taxing the corporations and the wealthy!......wait a minute!....Why are prices going up and why are jobs being lost?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Well you see, the government is stealing money from them so they have to make up for it by cutting jobs and increasing prices in order to make the money back that they lost to the government. It might get so bad that all these people will close up shop and move to other countries."

Leftists: "This is so stupid! Why don't we just give them a tax break so this disaster can stop?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Welcome to the Republican party! The party of the working class! You can see the Democrats want to destroy the working class!"

Not only pure fiction, but bad fiction at that. Consumption of goods is the engine that drives all economic activity and job creation. The poor and lower middle class spend nearly 100% of the $ they acquire immediately on consumer goods. So, every dollar transferred into their hands increases net consumption and therefore the demand that causes an increase in jobs needed to supply that demand.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

It was refuted definitively with the fact that women are not inanimate object while dollars are. That makes all the difference in any effort to transfer ownership of them.

"Taxing is theft" is not a fact, it is your wrong opinion based on your ignorant assumption that all wealth is generated solely by the actions of the individual who is in possession of it, with zero dependence or impact upon anyone else. Since those assumptions are objectively false, it is objectively false that "taxing is theft".

Leftists: "We did it! We are taxing the corporations and the wealthy!......wait a minute!....Why are prices going up and why are jobs being lost?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Well you see, the government is stealing money from them so they have to make up for it by cutting jobs and increasing prices in order to make the money back that they lost to the government. It might get so bad that all these people will close up shop and move to other countries."

Leftists: "This is so stupid! Why don't we just give them a tax break so this disaster can stop?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Welcome to the Republican party! The party of the working class! You can see the Democrats want to destroy the working class!"

Not only pure fiction, but bad fiction at that. Consumption of goods is the engine that drives all economic activity and job creation. The poor and lower middle class spend nearly 100% of the $ they acquire immediately on consumer goods. So, every dollar transferred into their hands increases net consumption and therefore the demand that causes an increase in jobs needed to supply that demand.

Well yeah, but that screws up the societal wealth redistribution/concentration we worked toward over the past half century.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

View attachment 24102

Productivity grows but wages do not. The top 10%, the managerial class, who control wages and CEO salaries, make sure wages don't grow while they make out like bandits. "Look more money to divide up! One for me. None for you. One for me. None for you."

Do you want to talk about theft and the American people? Really? And this crap will continue as long as the GOP rules anything.

At least that chart admits it's flawed. I see the same thing again and again with the flaw no longer identified.

What it's showing is that the economy has shifted away from factory work. Most factory jobs are now low-skill, the high-skill stuff is done by robots.

And it's not just the managerial class, but large numbers of us who work with our brains rather than our hands. I've never had a single report in my life and I do not expect ever to do so--I'm certainly not managerial. I am, however, one of those that the income has shifted to.

 

[Gun Nut]

My brother, who posts on a lot of right winger blogs, and has been banned so many times he can't count the bans (in the hundreds), notes that what seems to be the favorite entertainment of dumb-ass, whiny alt-right snow flakes is anime. Especially anime with cute lil buxom anime girls with cat ears. Why that is is a mystery. If you really want to rile up an alt-right wienie, make fun of anime. Warning, you will be immediately banned. Alt-right otakus have very thins skins when it comes to their cat eared anime girls.

The reason that anime is so popular among right-wing online groups is because the vast majority of those members are actually Chinese trolls posing as Repugs. Anime is very popular among asians. Go ahead and ask any real-life Republican you know to tell you about anime... they never even heard of it... except maybe they heard of Henti.. "you mean tentacle porn? naw that's stupid".

 

[Fentoine Lum]

View attachment 24102

Productivity grows but wages do not. The top 10%, the managerial class, who control wages and CEO salaries, make sure wages don't grow while they make out like bandits. "Look more money to divide up! One for me. None for you. One for me. None for you."

Do you want to talk about theft and the American people? Really? And this crap will continue as long as the GOP rules anything.

At least that chart admits it's flawed. I see the same thing again and again with the flaw no longer identified.

What it's showing is that the economy has shifted away from factory work. Most factory jobs are now low-skill, the high-skill stuff is done by robots.

And it's not just the managerial class, but large numbers of us who work with our brains rather than our hands. I've never had a single report in my life and I do not expect ever to do so--I'm certainly not managerial. I am, however, one of those that the income has shifted to.

It is a bipartisan, over time, redistribution and concentration of societal wealth, we all know where it was "shifted" to.

 

[repoman]

Just riffing on this





This is our sacred Five Words.

 

[Half-Life]

Incel is meant to insult a group of men who have difficulties finding women. The incel insult is mostly used by feminists or people who agree with the feminists. This is just as insulting to men as the "spinster" label was to women in the early days of women's suffrage. People called these early feminists "losers who couldn't find a man" and now we've come full circle and women are doing the same insults to men.

Anyone else find this disgusting?

 

[Half-Life]

Not only pure fiction, but bad fiction at that. Consumption of goods is the engine that drives all economic activity and job creation. The poor and lower middle class spend nearly 100% of the $ they acquire immediately on consumer goods. So, every dollar transferred into their hands increases net consumption and therefore the demand that causes an increase in jobs needed to supply that demand.

Well yeah, but that screws up the societal wealth redistribution/concentration we worked toward over the past half century.

Wealth redistribution? You mean stealing.

Let me give you an example. Suppose I go to someone's house to rob their TV. I'm about to walk in and suddenly it dawns on me that it's illegal for me to rob their TV. So, I walk back to my car and I call the government to come to the house. The government shows up and I tell them I want to steal the person's TV. The government goes inside, steals their TV, and gives it to me. Now, that's legal because the government stole from them to give to me!

 

[Half-Life]

It was refuted definitively with the fact that women are not inanimate object while dollars are. That makes all the difference in any effort to transfer ownership of them.

"Taxing is theft" is not a fact, it is your wrong opinion based on your ignorant assumption that all wealth is generated solely by the actions of the individual who is in possession of it, with zero dependence or impact upon anyone else. Since those assumptions are objectively false, it is objectively false that "taxing is theft".

Leftists: "We did it! We are taxing the corporations and the wealthy!......wait a minute!....Why are prices going up and why are jobs being lost?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Well you see, the government is stealing money from them so they have to make up for it by cutting jobs and increasing prices in order to make the money back that they lost to the government. It might get so bad that all these people will close up shop and move to other countries."

Leftists: "This is so stupid! Why don't we just give them a tax break so this disaster can stop?!?!?!"

Right-winger: "Welcome to the Republican party! The party of the working class! You can see the Democrats want to destroy the working class!"

Not only pure fiction, but bad fiction at that. Consumption of goods is the engine that drives all economic activity and job creation. The poor and lower middle class spend nearly 100% of the $ they acquire immediately on consumer goods. So, every dollar transferred into their hands increases net consumption and therefore the demand that causes an increase in jobs needed to supply that demand.

How is it fiction? Taxing corporations more will either foce them to raise the prices and layoff workers, or they will move to another country.

How would our economy re-grow if all the billionaires just up and left?

As I always say, the poor HATE the billionaires, but they love to take their money. It's like the kid who hates his father but on allowance day, he suddenly says "i love you, dad."

 

[ZiprHead]

Not only pure fiction, but bad fiction at that. Consumption of goods is the engine that drives all economic activity and job creation. The poor and lower middle class spend nearly 100% of the $ they acquire immediately on consumer goods. So, every dollar transferred into their hands increases net consumption and therefore the demand that causes an increase in jobs needed to supply that demand.

Well yeah, but that screws up the societal wealth redistribution/concentration we worked toward over the past half century.

Wealth redistribution? You mean stealing.

Let me give you an example. Suppose I go to someone's house to rob their TV. I'm about to walk in and suddenly it dawns on me that it's illegal for me to rob their TV. So, I walk back to my car and I call the government to come to the house. The government shows up and I tell them I want to steal the person's TV. The government goes inside, steals their TV, and gives it to me. Now, that's legal because the government stole from them to give to me!

I totally agree. I wish those conservative southern states would stop doing that.