Trump judicial nominee refuses to say whether she supports segregation

[Underseer]

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/do...nee-refuses-say-whether-supports-segregation/

Gosh, I wonder why she carefully avoided saying whether or not segregation is a good thing?

I'm sure there's a perfectly innocent, non-racist explanation for this. I can't wait to hear whatever just=so stories (ad hoc fallacies) conservolibertarians concoct to try and explain this one away. Of course they won't allow a fellow white supremacist alt-right free speech advocate to go undefended in a situation like this.

 

[LordKiran]

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/do...nee-refuses-say-whether-supports-segregation/

Gosh, I wonder why she carefully avoided saying whether or not segregation is a good thing?

I'm sure there's a perfectly innocent, non-racist explanation for this. I can't wait to hear whatever just=so stories (ad hoc fallacies) conservolibertarians concoct to try and explain this one away. Of course they won't allow a fellow white supremacist alt-right free speech advocate to go undefended in a situation like this.

Why not lie? I'm serious, would she even get in trouble with this government for it? Worst case scenario she maybe gets kicked out after a month or two.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I don't know where Underseer is coming from. She seems to have outrightly said, at the very least, the Government shouldn't have desegregated the schools.

“Senator, I don’t mean to be coy,” Vitter responded, “but I think I get into a difficult area when I start commenting on Supreme Court decisions, which are correctly decided and which I may disagree with.”

“My personal, political or religious views I would set aside,” she continued, saying that if she were confirmed she would uphold the “binding” decision.

I'm more curious as to what led the Senator to ask that question in the first place. It seems like an easy answer... for anyone not "Alt-Right".