• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Two police shot in Ferguson

I heard one of them used drugs once, so they clearly deserved to die...

*whisper*

Oh, wait. Were the cops white? This is an outrage! Bring the criminals to justice immediately! This kind of savagery cannot be allowed to stand!

PS -- Are you going to include a link?
 
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...g-ferguson-protest-after-police-chief-resigns

Two police officers were shot near a protest outside the Ferguson Police Department on Wednesday night, according to St Louis police officials. In a press briefing just before 2 a.m. local time Thursday morning, St. Louis County police chief Jon Belmar confirmed that one officer was wounded in the shoulder, and another officer was shot in the face. Who fired the shots remains unclear. A spokesperson for the St. Louis County Police said the two officers sustained "very serious," but non-life threatening injuries.
 
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...g-ferguson-protest-after-police-chief-resigns

Two police officers were shot near a protest outside the Ferguson Police Department on Wednesday night, according to St Louis police officials. In a press briefing just before 2 a.m. local time Thursday morning, St. Louis County police chief Jon Belmar confirmed that one officer was wounded in the shoulder, and another officer was shot in the face. Who fired the shots remains unclear. A spokesperson for the St. Louis County Police said the two officers sustained "very serious," but non-life threatening injuries.

This is a useless summary. Were the cops black or white? Were the shooters black or white? That is what matters right?
 
Not certain this is what King had in mind. What is going through your mind when people in positions of notable power are leaving their jobs because of what happened... and then you decide to shoot a couple officers?
This is a useless summary. Were the cops black or white? Were the shooters black or white? That is what matters right?
According to statistics, yes, it does seem to.
 
Oh, wait. Were the cops white?
Then they deserve what they got because some other white people did bad things at some point in history.
</progressoauthoritarian>

I see the Ferguson protesters are still having a very hard time with the whole concept of "peaceful protesting" though.
 
Oh, wait. Were the cops white?
Then they deserve what they got because some other white people did bad things at some point in history.
</progressoauthoritarian>
I'm thinking that wasn't the angle the point was coming from.

I see the Ferguson protesters are still having a very hard time with the whole concept of "peaceful protesting" though.
Seeing that the shooting didn't involve all of the police getting mowed down, I think your statement about the Ferguson protestors is just an attempt to smear an entire group of people over the hateful and violent actions of one or maybe two people.
 
I'm thinking that wasn't the angle the point was coming from.
That's exactly the angle you and Underseer are coming from.

Seeing that the shooting didn't involve all of the police getting mowed down, I think your statement about the Ferguson protestors is just an attempt to smear an entire group of people over the hateful and violent actions of one or maybe two people.
Except that Ferguson protesters have been violent since they looted and torched that QT on the first night of the riots.
 
That's exactly the angle you and Underseer are coming from.
No. Not at all. Maybe if you stuff more straw into it, it'll burn quicker.

Seeing that the shooting didn't involve all of the police getting mowed down, I think your statement about the Ferguson protestors is just an attempt to smear an entire group of people over the hateful and violent actions of one or maybe two people.
Except that Ferguson protesters have been violent since they looted and torched that QT on the first night of the riots.
No. The damage was done by a limited number of hooligans. Not the protestors en masse. But blacks were involved in the Watts riots, so maybe we can use that historical precedence and arrest all of the protestors?
 
So, people are getting shot again due to the climate of hate the democrats created.
 
Shooting people (police or otherwise) when you are not defending against imminent and unavoidable lethal danger is wrong. This type of behavior demeans the legitimate efforts of the protestors, and plays into the hands of racists and authoritarians.
 
No. Not at all. Maybe if you stuff more straw into it, it'll burn quicker.
Except it's not made of straw. It was you, in another thread said that we committed genocide against Indians?

]No. The damage was done by a limited number of hooligans. Not the protestors en masse.
Of course it's a "limited number", the question is what is the limit.
The protesters didn't do much to prevent such behavior in their midst. In fact, Michael Brown's stepfather incited violence.


But blacks were involved in the Watts riots, so maybe we can use that historical precedence and arrest all of the protestors?
Well you have no problem blaming modern-day whites for what happened in the 16th or 17th century so maybe you should. I instead prefer not to blame entire races.
 
Except that Ferguson protesters have been violent since they looted and torched that QT on the first night of the riots.

There it is again.

Emails surface from the courts and cops in Ferguson that were overtly racist. That's just a few bad apples and not a sign of institutional racism.

But hooligans that caused trouble in the protests are "Ferguson protesters" en masse.
 
Not certain this is what King had in mind. What is going through your mind when people in positions of notable power are leaving their jobs because of what happened... and then you decide to shoot a couple officers?
This is a useless summary. Were the cops black or white? Were the shooters black or white? That is what matters right?
According to statistics, yes, it does seem to.

Your right, stats show that the shooters were almost certainly black, and very likely had criminal records.
Also, the cops would probably not have been shot if they were black, because the black shooters were likely racists.
 
Not certain this is what King had in mind. What is going through your mind when people in positions of notable power are leaving their jobs because of what happened... and then you decide to shoot a couple officers? According to statistics, yes, it does seem to.

Your right, stats show that the shooters were almost certainly black, and very likely had criminal records.
Also, the cops would probably not have been shot if they were black, because the black shooters were likely racists.
Well, if the police officers are on the Ferguson police force, the odds are overwhelming they are not black.
 
Your right, stats show that the shooters were almost certainly black, and very likely had criminal records.
Also, the cops would probably not have been shot if they were black, because the black shooters were likely racists.
Well, if the police officers are on the Ferguson police force, the odds are overwhelming they are not black.

True, but even without that fact, the odds were already overwhelming that they were white, because facts point to black shooters fueled by racist anger.
 
Your right, stats show that the shooters were almost certainly black, and very likely had criminal records.

you mean very likely had trumped up criminal records since that was the finding of the DOJ report
 
Back
Top Bottom