repoman
Contributor
EOM
Two police officers were shot near a protest outside the Ferguson Police Department on Wednesday night, according to St Louis police officials. In a press briefing just before 2 a.m. local time Thursday morning, St. Louis County police chief Jon Belmar confirmed that one officer was wounded in the shoulder, and another officer was shot in the face. Who fired the shots remains unclear. A spokesperson for the St. Louis County Police said the two officers sustained "very serious," but non-life threatening injuries.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...g-ferguson-protest-after-police-chief-resigns
Two police officers were shot near a protest outside the Ferguson Police Department on Wednesday night, according to St Louis police officials. In a press briefing just before 2 a.m. local time Thursday morning, St. Louis County police chief Jon Belmar confirmed that one officer was wounded in the shoulder, and another officer was shot in the face. Who fired the shots remains unclear. A spokesperson for the St. Louis County Police said the two officers sustained "very serious," but non-life threatening injuries.
According to statistics, yes, it does seem to.This is a useless summary. Were the cops black or white? Were the shooters black or white? That is what matters right?
Then they deserve what they got because some other white people did bad things at some point in history.Oh, wait. Were the cops white?
I'm thinking that wasn't the angle the point was coming from.Then they deserve what they got because some other white people did bad things at some point in history.Oh, wait. Were the cops white?
</progressoauthoritarian>
Seeing that the shooting didn't involve all of the police getting mowed down, I think your statement about the Ferguson protestors is just an attempt to smear an entire group of people over the hateful and violent actions of one or maybe two people.I see the Ferguson protesters are still having a very hard time with the whole concept of "peaceful protesting" though.
That's exactly the angle you and Underseer are coming from.I'm thinking that wasn't the angle the point was coming from.
Except that Ferguson protesters have been violent since they looted and torched that QT on the first night of the riots.Seeing that the shooting didn't involve all of the police getting mowed down, I think your statement about the Ferguson protestors is just an attempt to smear an entire group of people over the hateful and violent actions of one or maybe two people.
No. Not at all. Maybe if you stuff more straw into it, it'll burn quicker.That's exactly the angle you and Underseer are coming from.
No. The damage was done by a limited number of hooligans. Not the protestors en masse. But blacks were involved in the Watts riots, so maybe we can use that historical precedence and arrest all of the protestors?Except that Ferguson protesters have been violent since they looted and torched that QT on the first night of the riots.Seeing that the shooting didn't involve all of the police getting mowed down, I think your statement about the Ferguson protestors is just an attempt to smear an entire group of people over the hateful and violent actions of one or maybe two people.
Except it's not made of straw. It was you, in another thread said that we committed genocide against Indians?No. Not at all. Maybe if you stuff more straw into it, it'll burn quicker.
Of course it's a "limited number", the question is what is the limit.]No. The damage was done by a limited number of hooligans. Not the protestors en masse.
Well you have no problem blaming modern-day whites for what happened in the 16th or 17th century so maybe you should. I instead prefer not to blame entire races.But blacks were involved in the Watts riots, so maybe we can use that historical precedence and arrest all of the protestors?
What is this about?Well you have no problem blaming modern-day whites for what happened in the 16th or 17th century so maybe you should. I instead prefer not to blame entire races.
Except that Ferguson protesters have been violent since they looted and torched that QT on the first night of the riots.
Not certain this is what King had in mind. What is going through your mind when people in positions of notable power are leaving their jobs because of what happened... and then you decide to shoot a couple officers?According to statistics, yes, it does seem to.This is a useless summary. Were the cops black or white? Were the shooters black or white? That is what matters right?
Well, if the police officers are on the Ferguson police force, the odds are overwhelming they are not black.Not certain this is what King had in mind. What is going through your mind when people in positions of notable power are leaving their jobs because of what happened... and then you decide to shoot a couple officers? According to statistics, yes, it does seem to.
Your right, stats show that the shooters were almost certainly black, and very likely had criminal records.
Also, the cops would probably not have been shot if they were black, because the black shooters were likely racists.
Well, if the police officers are on the Ferguson police force, the odds are overwhelming they are not black.Your right, stats show that the shooters were almost certainly black, and very likely had criminal records.
Also, the cops would probably not have been shot if they were black, because the black shooters were likely racists.
Your right, stats show that the shooters were almost certainly black, and very likely had criminal records.
