https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-birth-rate-unfpa-defunded-donald-trump-administration
Too bad it's unplanned births.
Yet another Republican victory!
Too bad it's unplanned births.
Yet another Republican victory!
Favoring corporate interests over human interests is what gives you this.
We do not have a society.
We have huge areas of stagnant poverty and islands of wealth surrounded by gates.
And a government that only listens to the islands.
Favoring corporate interests over human interests is what gives you this.
We do not have a society.
We have huge areas of stagnant poverty and islands of wealth surrounded by gates.
And a government that only listens to the islands.
Your eternal attempts to frame everything in terms of democracy vs dictatorship is as usual a total miss.
This has nothing to do with our governmental system, but rather the anti-sex attitudes of Christianity.
Favoring corporate interests over human interests is what gives you this.
We do not have a society.
We have huge areas of stagnant poverty and islands of wealth surrounded by gates.
And a government that only listens to the islands.
Your eternal attempts to frame everything in terms of democracy vs dictatorship is as usual a total miss.
This has nothing to do with our governmental system, but rather the anti-sex attitudes of Christianity.
Education has nothing to do with governmental systems?
Education has nothing to do with governmental systems?
The problem is anti-sex attitudes from the Christians. While the government plays a role in this they have a lot of popular support. The masses can be wrong!
Education has nothing to do with governmental systems?
The problem is anti-sex attitudes from the Christians. While the government plays a role in this they have a lot of popular support. The masses can be wrong!
Is it your position that the anti-sex attitudes of Christians today is both A) more restrictive and B) more influential in culture than, say, during the 1950s?
Is it your position that the anti-sex attitudes of Christians today is both A) more restrictive and B) more influential in culture than, say, during the 1950s?
Huh? I don't understand the relevance.
1) Oopses were hushed up back then. An awful lot of first babies somehow managed to be born in less than 9 months after marriage.
2) We have much better contraceptive options now.
Aren't those still unplanned births?
2) We have much better contraceptive options now.
And it's your position that people aren't using those better contraceptives because of the anti-sex attitudes of Christians?
Not wanting a 'cause' is not the wanting of an effect.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-birth-rate-unfpa-defunded-donald-trump-administration
Too bad it's unplanned births.
Yet another Republican victory!

This suggests that use of contraceptives (by women) is 70% in the USA, which is higher than in for example Australia, Spain, Austria, Italy, Sweden or Germany.
Which does not suggest that stigma and social pressure is preventing all that many American women from using birth control?
If so, why is the USA apparently (according to the same report) no.1 in the world for unplanned births?
When you say "block access to sex education," is that of the straight forward and there's nothing else to say variety, or is it with the strings are attached and everything else is mum variety?This suggests that use of contraceptives (by women) is 70% in the USA, which is higher than in for example Australia, Spain, Austria, Italy, Sweden or Germany.
Which does not suggest that stigma and social pressure is preventing all that many American women from using birth control?
If so, why is the USA apparently (according to the same report) no.1 in the world for unplanned births?
IIRC, it's not the US as a whole which is the problem, but certain areas of the US which skew the numbers. In blue states, people are properly educated and know how to protect themselves and have access to abortion services if something goes wrong. In the red states, the fundies block access to sex education and go with abstinence training, which leads to more unplanned pregnancies and then they're barred access to abortion services for when those pregnancies happen.
From the paper:
View attachment 18279
This suggests that use of contraceptives (by women) is 70% in the USA, which is higher than in for example Australia, Spain, Austria, Italy, Sweden or Germany.
Which does not suggest that stigma and social pressure is preventing all that many American women from using birth control?
If so, why is the USA apparently (according to the same report) no.1 in the world for unplanned births?
From the paper:
View attachment 18279
This suggests that use of contraceptives (by women) is 70% in the USA, which is higher than in for example Australia, Spain, Austria, Italy, Sweden or Germany.
Which does not suggest that stigma and social pressure is preventing all that many American women from using birth control?
If so, why is the USA apparently (according to the same report) no.1 in the world for unplanned births?
Scratching my head ... Chad, the Congo etc. must do a lot of birth planning since they don't use contraceptives, but lag behind the US in "unplanned births". Perhaps there is stigma attached to reporting a birth as un-planned?
But they were hushed up, we weren't as aware of them.
And it's your position that people aren't using those better contraceptives because of the anti-sex attitudes of Christians?
I'm saying the oops rate can't be reasonably compared because it was much harder to avoid an oops back then.
In a rich country like the USA, another factor could simply be that people don't plan against having kids because they can afford to have them. Some have an attitude that they are not specifically planning or trying to have a kid right away, but if they do, then that's a nice surprise.
It shocks me when I go to the Philippines and see how the Catholic church has made condoms far from the norm. It is very common there not to use them. The result is babies they can't afford to support, a social support system that isn't first world. It leads to a lot of needless suffering.
In a rich country like the USA, another factor could simply be that people don't plan against having kids because they can afford to have them. Some have an attitude that they are not specifically planning or trying to have a kid right away, but if they do, then that's a nice surprise.