I've been wondering about this lately..
- Can all the functions of the the brain and nervous system be generalized into one primary function?
- If not, why not?
- If so, what is that primary function?
Your answers are much appreciated..
That would be important, but I would hazard a guess for the OP:I've been wondering about this lately..
- Can all the functions of the the brain and nervous system be generalized into one primary function?
- If not, why not?
- If so, what is that primary function?
Your answers are much appreciated..
Define "primary function".
That would be important, but I would hazard a guess for the OP:I've been wondering about this lately..
- Can all the functions of the the brain and nervous system be generalized into one primary function?
- If not, why not?
- If so, what is that primary function?
Your answers are much appreciated..
Define "primary function".
The coordination of the body in response to conditions for the purpose of maintaining homeostasis and reproduction.
Peez
That would be important, but I would hazard a guess for the OP:
The coordination of the body in response to conditions for the purpose of maintaining homeostasis and reproduction.
Peez
I think that's correct. Primative organisms don't need a brain to respond to stimulus from the environment. But having a centralized nervous system allows conflicts between various functions to be coordinated to best advantage.
I don't think "primary" function really means anything in this case. If an organ has multiple vital functions, and both the brain and the other components of the nervous system certainly do. there's no reason to distinguish between them in terms of importance. Would you try to decide whether structurally supporting the upper body or acting as conduit for the nervous system is the primary function of the spine? You're a few steps from death if it stops performing either one.
I've been wondering about this lately..
- Can all the functions of the the brain and nervous system be generalized into one primary function?
- If not, why not?
- If so, what is that primary function?
Your answers are much appreciated..
- If so, what is that primary function?
Define "primary function".
EBThere are different levels of abstraction when we describe anything and that's true certainly of organs.
Still, as I see it, all cells, for example, whether in the brain or in the leg, will do very similar things, but they will do also things that are specific to them.
So, by "function", I will guess that you mean what an organ does that's specific to it and that helps understand why the human species survives.
- If so, what is that primary function?
The coordination of the body in response to conditions for the purpose of maintaining homeostasis and reproduction.
I don't think "primary" function really means anything in this case. If an organ has multiple vital functions, and both the brain and the other components of the nervous system certainly do. there's no reason to distinguish between them in terms of importance. Would you try to decide whether structurally supporting the upper body or acting as conduit for the nervous system is the primary function of the spine? You're a few steps from death if it stops performing either one.
EBThere are different levels of abstraction when we describe anything and that's true certainly of organs.
Still, as I see it, all cells, for example, whether in the brain or in the leg, will do very similar things, but they will do also things that are specific to them.
So, by "function", I will guess that you mean what an organ does that's specific to it and that helps understand why the human species survives.
Sure:
EBThere are different levels of abstraction when we describe anything and that's true certainly of organs.
Still, as I see it, all cells, for example, whether in the brain or in the leg, will do very similar things, but they will do also things that are specific to them.
So, by "function", I will guess that you mean what an organ does that's specific to it and that helps understand why the human species survives.
Sure:
EBThere are different levels of abstraction when we describe anything and that's true certainly of organs.
Still, as I see it, all cells, for example, whether in the brain or in the leg, will do very similar things, but they will do also things that are specific to them.
So, by "function", I will guess that you mean what an organ does that's specific to it and that helps understand why the human species survives.
You got off to a promising start telling it what you understand under "function"; this doesn't however answer the question what rousseau means, and it doesn't even start to touch the question what either of you means with primary.
Is primary to be understood chronologically, i.e. is the primary function the one that is historically prior?
Or is it to be understood as the most vital function, the one whose absence would kill us most quickly? Do we include functions that (in humans/mammals) are served by the central nervous system due to historical evolutionary contingencies or only ones that cannot be adequately served by other systems (endocrine system, local feedback loops) in principle?
Or is the primary function the one that consumes most resources within the brain and central nervous system?
Are we excluding the endocrine system, and why?
The answer to the OP's question will depend on these parameters. E. g. if it's the most vital function we're after and include everything that happens to be regulated by the nervous system, it's going to be controlling circulation and respiration - despite the fact that a fully autonomous heart and lung are definitely imaginable (though they might be poorer at increasing supply in times of heightened consumption), and despite the fact that our ancestors probably had a circulatory system of sorts before they had a nervous system.
Primary
1. First or highest in rank or importance; principal. See Synonyms at chief.
So, by "function", I will guess that you mean what an organ does that's specific to it and that helps understand why the human species survives.