WhichPhilosophies Marxist derail thread

[whichphilosophy]

You're probably not the best authority on what English words mean.

- - - Updated - - -

Check their own websites and left wing media.

Yeah, behind the scenes...probably not. But I still fail to see the connection between the January 21st 2017AD Woman's March in Washington, District of Colombia, of the United States and these marxist boogiewomen you bring up. At the same time there are websites to support Keith&Co's concern about that Air Farce deal with space aliens.
http://www.aliens-everything-you-want-to-know.com/TheMeninBlack.html

Uh -oh. That's treading on WP's space as a big bull-leaver in space aliens.

So you refuse to read their own website and others, yet come up with a non-sequiteur comment. 7 of the 8 are revolutionary Marxists.

So when you say revolutionary, do you mean that they are radical or that they are trailblazers?

Real Democrat campaigners can be trailblazers. Revolutionaries who promote violence and with to suppress free speech are not.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Of course so I have an excuse more the posts I put out.

More of that special approach to English, I see.

However we should be aware of their strategy and that the ideology is frequently not just through the barrel of a gun or the ballot box.

All you're really providing, though, is the label. And repeated claims about their goals and motivations.

We realise that a democratic society attracts undemocratic elements.

And a special approach to pronouns, I suspect.

 

[Keith&Co.]

You know who hated Marxists? Hitler.

Was there anything about 'hating Marxists (even the militant variety)

Sure looks like it. You stamp the label and you're done. Like i was saying, there are trends and fashions in mindless hate and label-based discrimination. You seem about a century behind. But maybe it's cyclic.

 

[whichphilosophy]

I really don't care. The question is, why aren't the right wingers organizing these marches on behalf of women? Just don't care? Don't notice that all too often women get the short end of the stick?

George Bush got more Americans killed with his lies than all the Marxists in the USA ever did collectively. The GOP attack on ACA and Medicaid will kill more over time. And the right wingers and GOP don't care. Let's have less hysteria about Marxists and more careful thinking about what is about to befall us.

Why do you think the real motive is about the rights of women? The main thrust is they are anti-Trump/government marches which attracted drum thumping revolutionaries who took the lead on 08 March 2017, Women's rights marches and the strike included several well intended persons but the concept of women's rights is simply the sugar coating for those obsessed with Trump.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Check their own websites and left wing media.

Yeah, behind the scenes...probably not. But I still fail to see the connection between the January 21st 2017AD Woman's March in Washington, District of Colombia, of the United States and these marxist boogiewomen you bring up. At the same time there are websites to support Keith&Co's concern about that Air Farce deal with space aliens.
http://www.aliens-everything-you-want-to-know.com/TheMeninBlack.html

Uh -oh. That's treading on WP's space as a big bull-leaver in space aliens.

I can neither confirm nor deny such things, as I have signed a non-disclosure agreement

Looking at a website doesn't require a disclosure agreement; just grip a mouse and google.

 

[laughing dog]

Non violence unlike BANM and Revolutionary socialists.

But the women's marchs were non-violent. So, I guess those scary and evil revolutionary Marxists are not as influential as you imagine.

Why do you think the real motive is about the rights of women? The main thrust is they are anti-Trump/government marches which attracted drum thumping revolutionaries who took the lead on 08 March 2017, Women's rights marches and the strike included several well intended persons but the concept of women's rights is simply the sugar coating for those obsessed with Trump.

You think you know what really motivated millions of women across the world to march just because they had the the audacity to violate your views on what, when and where to protest?

 

[whichphilosophy]

More of that special approach to English, I see.

However we should be aware of their strategy and that the ideology is frequently not just through the barrel of a gun or the ballot box.

All you're really providing, though, is the label. And repeated claims about their goals and motivations.

We realise that a democratic society attracts undemocratic elements.

And a special approach to pronouns, I suspect.

The goals and objectives of extremists come from their own websites. Do you know how the last sentence I said works and why it is true?

 

[untermensche]

It is complete ignorance to claim that people who have been jailed fighting against Israeli brutal oppression and continual unending crimes are somehow now forbidden from speaking up for women's rights.

Rasmea Yousef Odeh doesn't deny it. She just says she was forced to confess it (maybe some persuasion) However the forensics and the bomb making equipment was found in her apartment.

She paid the price for her crimes right?

There are issues in the US....

Which is why there is protest in the US.

The inability to solve all problems does not mean we solve none.

 

[whichphilosophy]

But the women's marchs were non-violent. So, I guess those scary and evil revolutionary Marxists are not as influential as you imagine.

Why do you think the real motive is about the rights of women? The main thrust is they are anti-Trump/government marches which attracted drum thumping revolutionaries who took the lead on 08 March 2017, Women's rights marches and the strike included several well intended persons but the concept of women's rights is simply the sugar coating for those obsessed with Trump.

You think you know what really motivated millions of women across the world to march just because they had the the audacity to violate your views on what, when and where to protest?

Take legitimate concerns (e.g. Abortion,) and add some revolutionary Marxist diatribe, a dash of femi-nazi ism, and a pinch of Jihadi ayou get a great frothy cocktail that can bubble over for quite a while.

- - - Updated - - -

Was there anything about 'hating Marxists (even the militant variety)

Sure looks like it. You stamp the label and you're done. Like i was saying, there are trends and fashions in mindless hate and label-based discrimination. You seem about a century behind. But maybe it's cyclic.

Hating means jailing, banning. It is just as bad to promote extremists as it is to ban them.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Hating means jailing, banning. It is just as bad to promote extremists as it is to ban them.

Hah. You use 'synonym' with weirdity.

 

[ZiprHead]

Take legitimate concerns (e.g. Abortion,) and add some revolutionary Marxist diatribe, a dash of femi-nazi ism, and a pinch of Jihadi ayou get a great frothy cocktail that can bubble over for quite a while.

You're sounding more and more like a standard religious nutcase.

BTW, can you provide some example of revolutionary marxism in the women's protests?

 

[whichphilosophy]

Take legitimate concerns (e.g. Abortion,) and add some revolutionary Marxist diatribe, a dash of femi-nazi ism, and a pinch of Jihadi ayou get a great frothy cocktail that can bubble over for quite a while.

You're sounding more and more like a standard religious nutcase.

BTW, can you provide some example of revolutionary marxism in the women's protests?

I did; they are on the board which organised them.

 

[ZiprHead]

You're sounding more and more like a standard religious nutcase.

BTW, can you provide some example of revolutionary marxism in the women's protests?

I did; they are on the board which organised them.

Nice dodge. What was the marxism they expressed to inspire women to march?

 

[Keith&Co.]

You're sounding more and more like a standard religious nutcase.

BTW, can you provide some example of revolutionary marxism in the women's protests?

I did; they are on the board which organised them.

Nooooooooooo. He didn't ask for revolutionary MarxISTS.

This opacity you show is what tends to make me disinterested in your interpretation of many things. You are projecting, at the very least.

 

[laughing dog]

Take legitimate concerns (e.g. Abortion,) and add some revolutionary Marxist diatribe, a dash of femi-nazi ism, and a pinch of Jihadi ayou get a great frothy cocktail that can bubble over for quite a while.

So, you do think you know what motivated those uppity women to ignore your views on what, when and where to protest.

That is simply arrogance. Add in a dash of conservative loonisphere (revolutionary Marxist diatribe) and a dash of misogynistic vomit (femi-nazism) and you get a noxious turd of an argument whose stench hurts any rational brain that comes into contact with it.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

You're probably not the best authority on what English words mean.

- - - Updated - - -

Check their own websites and left wing media.

Yeah, behind the scenes...probably not. But I still fail to see the connection between the January 21st 2017AD Woman's March in Washington, District of Colombia, of the United States and these marxist boogiewomen you bring up. At the same time there are websites to support Keith&Co's concern about that Air Farce deal with space aliens.
http://www.aliens-everything-you-want-to-know.com/TheMeninBlack.html

Uh -oh. That's treading on WP's space as a big bull-leaver in space aliens.

So you refuse to read their own website and others, yet come up with a non-sequiteur comment. 7 of the 8 are revolutionary Marxists.

So when you say revolutionary, do you mean that they are radical or that they are trailblazers?

Real Democrat campaigners can be trailblazers. Revolutionaries who promote violence and with to suppress free speech are not.

That isn't an answer.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Take legitimate concerns (e.g. Abortion,) and add some revolutionary Marxist diatribe, a dash of femi-nazi ism, and a pinch of Jihadi ayou get a great frothy cocktail that can bubble over for quite a while.

So, you do think you know what motivated those uppity women to ignore your views on what, when and where to protest.

That is simply arrogance. Add in a dash of conservative loonisphere (revolutionary Marxist diatribe) and a dash of misogynistic vomit (femi-nazism) and you get a noxious turd of an argument whose stench hurts any rational brain that comes into contact with it.

They didn't ignore my views; they have an agenda as I never discussed anything with them. A Revolutionary Marxist candidate would not gather many votes in an election but they can work to influence the ideals and agendas in many areas.

My points referred to the Jihadi concept of alliances with the left and civil rights femi-nazis (not feminists however) and environmental groups.I'm sure this has extended beyond the ISIS blueprint on this (Black Flags of Rome).

There are also extremes on the right

 

[whichphilosophy]

You're probably not the best authority on what English words mean.

- - - Updated - - -

Check their own websites and left wing media.

Yeah, behind the scenes...probably not. But I still fail to see the connection between the January 21st 2017AD Woman's March in Washington, District of Colombia, of the United States and these marxist boogiewomen you bring up. At the same time there are websites to support Keith&Co's concern about that Air Farce deal with space aliens.
http://www.aliens-everything-you-want-to-know.com/TheMeninBlack.html

Uh -oh. That's treading on WP's space as a big bull-leaver in space aliens.

So you refuse to read their own website and others, yet come up with a non-sequiteur comment. 7 of the 8 are revolutionary Marxists.

So when you say revolutionary, do you mean that they are radical or that they are trailblazers?

Real Democrat campaigners can be trailblazers. Revolutionaries who promote violence and with to suppress free speech are not.

That isn't an answer.

I don't see how supplying guns used to assassinate a judge (Angela Davis) or carrying out 2 bombings that killed people (Rasmea Yousef Odeh) as trail blazers. Obamacare despite its high cost, was a step towards progress and can be described as a trailblazer.

- - - Updated - - -

I did; they are on the board which organised them.

Nooooooooooo. He didn't ask for revolutionary MarxISTS.

This opacity you show is what tends to make me disinterested in your interpretation of many things. You are projecting, at the very least.

If a Marxist's website or left wing media says the person is a Marxist, that is simply my highlighting of this.

- - - Updated - - -

I did; they are on the board which organised them.

Nice dodge. What was the Marxism they expressed to inspire women to march?

I supplied references of these persons quite a few times do you want these?

 

[whichphilosophy]

Rasmea Yousef Odeh doesn't deny it. She just says she was forced to confess it (maybe some persuasion) However the forensics and the bomb making equipment was found in her apartment.

She paid the price for her crimes right?

There are issues in the US....

Which is why there is protest in the US.

The inability to solve all problems does not mean we solve none.

She was exchanged in some kind of prisoner swap so in that sense she did not serve her sentence. Further she did not declare her conviction when she applied for asylum in the USA. She was given a jail sentence for this. I don't have the latest but I think she is now appealing a deportation order.

The US does need protests to avoid the erosion of civil liberties. However when those who erode civil liberties lead the protests we can start to question.

 

[laughing dog]

They didn't ignore my views; they have an agenda as I never discussed anything with them.

You are the one who whines about the timing of the marches (when), where they took place, who is attending and not attending, and what they are about. Really, your pique over being ignored is obvious.

A Revolutionary Marxist candidate would not gather many votes in an election but they can work to influence the ideals and agendas in many areas.

So what? You are the one who said they engaged in violence and there has been no violence.

My points referred to the Jihadi concept of alliances with the left and civil rights femi-nazis (not feminists however) and environmental groups.I'm sure this has extended beyond the ISIS blueprint on this (Black Flags of Rome).

My point was your claim that the women's marches are masterminded or run by dangerous and fringe "extremist" masterminds is noxious horseshit. And your response supports my point.