• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Will Bugs Bunny in drag episodes be banned/limited in the near future?

repoman

Contributor
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
8,617
Location
Seattle, WA
Basic Beliefs
Science Based Atheism
What say ye?

This is a good video about bugs:



This a good comment:
Bugs is an incarnation of the Trickster (Archetype, Hero, god, ...), and the Trickster is not only Bi, but a shape changer and inveterate cross-dresser. Loki, the normally male Trickster Norse god goes so far as to become the mother (yes mother) of Sleipnir eight legged horse. It should be noted that Elmer Fudd also cross dresses at the end of Rabbit of Seville, after Bugs gives him an engagement ring.
 
Indeed, Loki even got Thor into drag once
https://childofyden.wordpress.com/2012/05/15/fun-facts-about-norse-mythology-thor-and-loki-in-drag/
loki_dolling_up_thor_by_humon-d31hhc9.jpg
 
Why would bugs bunny in drag be banned? There is some law in the works about that? Did I miss something in the OP?
 
Why would bugs bunny in drag be banned? There is some law in the works about that? Did I miss something in the OP?

I'm sure someone, somewhere, is offended by the fact that Bugs wearing drag makes light of the transvestite's struggle to be accepted.
Or that BB in D makes people think that transgenders are really only in it for laughs, marginalizing their deep feelings and inner torment.
And of course, someone else now looks at the same cartoon and finds that Warner Brothers were early proponents of icky unnatural behavior.
And the calendar challenged will see the cartoon and decide that the artists turned BB political tool for the LGBTAWOL agenda.

In a couple generations when the sex robots are demanding the vote, the mad scientist episode where Bugs kisses a robot bunny will also be held under scornful scrutiny.
 
Why would bugs bunny in drag be banned? There is some law in the works about that? Did I miss something in the OP?

Because the Politically Correct Conspiracy is out to persecute heterosexual men for being heterosexual men. Since heterosexual men are dependent on children's cartoons, it is thought that banning children's cartoons will cripple heterosexual men in the name of the Homosexual AgendaTM.

See, it is valiant Patriots like Repoman who defend our freedoms from sinister conspiracies like the Homosexual AgendaTM. :p :cheeky:
 
In a couple generations when the sex robots are demanding the vote, the mad scientist episode where Bugs kisses a robot bunny will also be held under scornful scrutiny.

Why would any type of robot demand the vote? Wouldn't they be preoccupied with exterminating humanity? Besides voting is an inferior social invention of mankind that can not compete with the cold logic of the thinking machines.
 
In a couple generations when the sex robots are demanding the vote, the mad scientist episode where Bugs kisses a robot bunny will also be held under scornful scrutiny.

Why would any type of robot demand the vote? Wouldn't they be preoccupied with exterminating humanity? Besides voting is an inferior social invention of mankind that can not compete with the cold logic of the thinking machines.
Ah, but they cannot prove their superiority until they level the playing field. So they demand the vote, their candidates make all sorts of wild promises like robot marriage and robot abortion and robot gun ownership, and the humans put up a humans-first candidate and the day after the election, that candidate rips off his mask to show the circuitry, and THEN, their superiority is displayed as we elected a robot on the robot prejudice ticket.
 
It is called the Overton Window.

The Overton Window requires a claim be plausible. These wacky conspiracy theories of your are only plausible to people who consume the same propaganda as you do.
Oh, the OP isn't pushing some sort of conspiracy. He's simply obsessed concerned with the politics of gender identity given his posting history.
 
So, I was watching today's "Movie Fights" on the Screen Junkies youtube channel.

One fight was about which woman director should make a Star Wars movie. One of the contestant said Lana Wachowski and I almost laughed. Lana was Larry before and made lots of big movies as a male before, and giving her this slot that Disney said will be for a woman is bonkers.

Some are touting Jennifer Kent, the director of The Babadook, as a possibility.
 
See, kids?

The fact that transgendered people are marginalized, ridiculed, and even beaten or killed is not evidence that they are being persecuted or oppressed, because Repoman thinks that someone might take away some of his cartoons, which proves that he is the real victim in all of this!
 
Back
Top Bottom