Meh, she did way worse before.
Also, is that her real name? Desiree is French or English, but Fairooz sounds Muslim ...
One deals with the arrest, trial, and imprisonment of a group of people that performed out in public. The other deals with a disruption in a Government building during a particular proceeding. Neither case is a glowing example of free speech, but the two are not equivalent.
I did not claim there were equivalent. I said they were similar and implied that arresting this woman for laughing is more ridiculous than arresting Pussy Riots for their premeditated performance at the church. Of course there is little chance for her going to prison for that I think.
Oh my... premeditated performance.
No, and I'm taking back the consolation prizes now. Two of the band members served 21 months for free speech.
To replace it with real one?
It was more like free scream with awful music in church.
They weren't imprisoned because it was loud punk music.
Irrelevant.
Pure illogic in action.
No, highly relevant.
No, smear the source for bias and poor journalistic quality.
You have the WEIRDEST impression of what that word means...
Not to anyone who understands reason and the English language. Her past is not relevant to the issue in the OP. Bringing it up is a pathetic smear the victim tactic.
The relevant way to rebut the report is to provide information about the case from other sources that contradicts the report. But thank you for admitting you are engaging in a smear tactic.
