- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 41,253
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
So this non-staged event (no security closing access to the road?) in public, of a woman (picture taken from behind) flipping off the President...'s motorcade. And she gets fired?
That is absurd.
her bosses called her into a meeting and said she had violated the company’s social media policy by using the photo as her profile picture on Twitter and Facebook
In her defense, it went viral without her. She doesn't seem too broken up about being let go though.She got fired for violating her employers social media policy:
her bosses called her into a meeting and said she had violated the company’s social media policy by using the photo as her profile picture on Twitter and Facebook
SHE used the photo inappropriately.
The text on the back looks too long... and too illegible.I suspect that shirt she is wearing is a company tee shirt that identifies the employer.
Yeah, and in Virginia, apparently that is just fine. Granted, I almost never ever mention work on social media.and that is where the issue is. NOT of her flipping off the president, but of her "representing" her company on social media in an unapproved manner.
The story said the photo was taken by a White House photographer, so how was she able to get it and use it on social media.
Later,
electEngr
She got fired for violating her employers social media policy:
her bosses called her into a meeting and said she had violated the company’s social media policy by using the photo as her profile picture on Twitter and Facebook
SHE used the photo inappropriately. I suspect that shirt she is wearing is a company tee shirt that identifies the employer.. .and that is where the issue is. NOT of her flipping off the president, but of her "representing" her company on social media in an unapproved manner.
She got fired for violating her employers social media policy:
SHE used the photo inappropriately. I suspect that shirt she is wearing is a company tee shirt that identifies the employer.. .and that is where the issue is. NOT of her flipping off the president, but of her "representing" her company on social media in an unapproved manner.
Yeah. It looks like there's a brand on that shirt.
Wearing a company logo while doing something like what she did is not a smart move!
What a moron.
She got fired for violating her employers social media policy:
SHE used the photo inappropriately. I suspect that shirt she is wearing is a company tee shirt that identifies the employer.. .and that is where the issue is. NOT of her flipping off the president, but of her "representing" her company on social media in an unapproved manner.
Yeah. It looks like there's a brand on that shirt.
Wearing a company logo while doing something like what she did is not a smart move!
She got fired for violating her employers social media policy:
SHE used the photo inappropriately. I suspect that shirt she is wearing is a company tee shirt that identifies the employer.. .and that is where the issue is. NOT of her flipping off the president, but of her "representing" her company on social media in an unapproved manner.
Yeah. It looks like there's a brand on that shirt.
Wearing a company logo while doing something like what she did is not a smart move!
The story said the photo was taken by a White House photographer, so how was she able to get it and use it on social media.
Later,
electEngr