I would be all in favor of female nudes on any money. I wonder if Bill still has the Polaroids he took of Hillary, back in the 70's.
So you would rather have a duck or a moose on the money than a woman?
So you would rather have a duck or a moose on the money than a woman?
- - - Updated - - -
Hamilton (10) and Franklin (100) were not presidents.
I would. We have some kickass animals here in 'Merica. A bear fighting a orca in front of the Bellagio on the back of the 20 wold be awesome. And the 50 could have T-rex shooting Hitler, because guns and dinosaurs.
So you would rather have a duck or a moose on the money than a woman?
I thought I made it clear that my issue was with identity politics being the criteria for who is on money. Not sure how you so badly misinterpreted that.
I would. We have some kickass animals here in 'Merica. A bear fighting a orca in front of the Bellagio on the back of the 20 wold be awesome. And the 50 could have T-rex shooting Hitler, because guns and dinosaurs.
Well, we already know that your real agenda is not to get Moose on money but SQUIRREL!! DON'T TRY TO DENY IT!!!! You want Rocky on ALL THE MONEY!!!!
It's amazing to me how many people prefer ANYTHING to the image of an actual real woman-one whose likeness has been captured, recorded/preserved and would not need to be re imagined. Unless she's naked.
I think we should put "Migrant Mother" on the $20. Then when things are bad, people can look at it and say, "Damn, could be worse".
View attachment 2999
Don't you think it would be better if the first woman you get on your money gets on there because of who she was instead of because she had a vagina?
By all means include women in the considerations of who you select, but dont select a woman just for the sake of selecting a woman.
Don't you think it would be better if the first woman you get on your money gets on there because of who she was instead of because she had a vagina?
By all means include women in the considerations of who you select, but dont select a woman just for the sake of selecting a woman.
So you think Mrs. Jones down the street would get equal consideration with Elizabeth Cady Stanton?
I dunno.So you think Mrs. Jones down the street would get equal consideration with Elizabeth Cady Stanton?
Don't you think it would be better if the first woman you get on your money gets on there because of who she was instead of because she had a vagina?
By all means include women in the considerations of who you select, but dont select a woman just for the sake of selecting a woman.
So you think Mrs. Jones down the street would get equal consideration with Elizabeth Cady Stanton?
I thought I made it clear that my issue was with identity politics being the criteria for who is on money. Not sure how you so badly misinterpreted that.
So you have for years been trying to remove men from money?
Definitely time for it. Women have been on our money, but never on our paper money.
Of the women mentioned in the OP, I would like to see either Susan B. Anthony, Alice Paul, or Elizabeth Stanton. I would add Carrie Chapman Catt and Lucy Stone to the list. We could even drop US Grant from the 50, and make room for two women.
It's time we had minority representation as well.
Let's go ahead and put Obama on one, but only distribute them in Texas. That would make for some quality entertainment.
I think if this going to become a thing we should spare future generations the identity politics and switch to the Canadian approach of waterfowl and moose and such.
All the people on your money are Presidents, so why not just put Hillary on there now instead of pointlessly waiting around?
That has the added bonus that when Bill buys a hooker, he'd pay her with pictures of his wife and this would get a bit of a chuckle, which is a nice gift for a woman who's been dead inside for years and could use a brief moment of joy.