The point is the numbers line up if you assume ministry of health counts bodies and reports civilian dead, Hamas reports total dead and Israel has a reasonably accurate toll of dead combatants. Ignore what Netanyahu is saying about ratios, he's a politician, expect everything to be a bit...
You don't get it--you want to believe that Israel's targeting is indiscriminate but the fact that they hit combatants a very disproportionate amount of the time says it's not.
Thus one's first assumption in a case like this is that these guys were observed shooting.
Well, they are no longer including the image that clearly revealed their deception. Even those images, though--that hole in the roof isn't as obviously wrong as the view from the other side but it's still pretty difficult for anything not heading straight down.
And once again you don't recognize the unpleasant reality of war: that you act to minimize civilian casualties but that hitting human shields is not a violation of Geneva.
And, once again, the idea that Jews are expendable. Just because they can't kill all the Jews it's not a deadly threat.
To grab it the Palestinians would have to declare statehood. That's something they will not do because that either leaves them with defining land that's not part of Palestine or it leaves it totally obvious that they want a one state with them in control.
I'm saying that no Arab nation would...
I'm not saying Israel always chooses the best options. I'm saying their track record is far above second place, but you consider it unacceptable.
And note that you aren't addressing my point one bit. You're still claiming there's something better, despite there not being a whiff of evidence...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.