abaddon
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2003
- Messages
- 2,332
Welcome backHiya, Abaddon, I am back at IIDB.
Welcome backHiya, Abaddon, I am back at IIDB.
Reality is physical energy. That alone forms all things in the universe without any exception.Many words reference objects and behaviors that we can stick a scientific fork into. Not so with words like existence and reality.
Hiya, Abaddon, I am back at IIDB.Oh yes.
Reality is frequently inaccurate.
Hmmm. None of scientists I have known is trying to research the nature of consciousness; they all tend to focus on things that are measurable. They seek new ways to predict the behavior and understand the nature of matter and energy. Whether or how “consciousness”(which lack rigorous definition), is an emergent property of matter and energy can’t even be determined. Hence, philosophers looking down their elevated noses at scientists - who largely feed clothe and shelter them.Solution: dismiss even evident realities if they don't conform with a scientific model, to pretend science has a completer picture of reality than it has.
Abaddon, I don't think science ever claims that. Science advances only when there are unknowns.Solution: dismiss even evident realities if they don't conform with a scientific model, to pretend science has a completer picture of reality than it has.
I didn't say science does that. I said some ideologues do that. There's no critique of science in my post. NONE.Abaddon, I don't think science ever claims that. Science advances only when there are unknowns.Solution: dismiss even evident realities if they don't conform with a scientific model, to pretend science has a completer picture of reality than it has.
Reality is physical energy. That alone forms all things in the universe without any exception.Many words reference objects and behaviors that we can stick a scientific fork into. Not so with words like existence and reality.
Existence is a phase of physical energy just like non-Existence. Science will know more about it in future.