This post doesnt make any sense at all.
First you must explain the situation at hand. Describe the scene. Where is the "pure nothing" and where is the human.
It's not really about pure nothing. It more about something that does not happen. Imagine sensation as a dimension all on its own. The only time something will appear in that dimension is when there is a sensation. With that in mind, read the following.
To sum it up simply, from what I understand about neurology is that the neuron either fires or it doesn't. Neurotransmitters are sent through the synaptic cleft (a gap between neurons) and the transmitters either cause an action potential (enough current to send a signal through the neuron) or they don't, all or nothing.
With nothing in the space of sensation, there is just a space of existence with nothing in it.
This really doesnt make any sense.
1)Sesnory perception isnt a dlmension.
2)We need sensors to interact with reality, not the neurons directly.
3) a "space of existence with nothing in it" is not nothing.