untermensche
Contributor
The infinite isnt a process.get a grip. infinity is applied to count and measure. That is it's existing definition. Should you want to talk about process find a thread on process. Don't try to impose something that is not there on the question being considered.
.., and even if process were part of the topic, which is is not, we would be looking at infinite processes which such as the universe may be. The universe may be a multiverse or a chaotic thing. If we look at limits we find that energy cannot be stable at zero motion, that whenever motion approaches zero in on context it energy appears in another. Perhaps the mechanism for an infinite process in one that is generally considered to be winding down. Musts have a habit of becoming probabilities, maybes, whenever we approach them empirically. So the relation between process and stasis is blurred, perhaps non-existent.
Laying demands on what has to happen is the bane of science since whenever someone does that that one's pet is overturned.
OK now back to your chants.
We are, in this discussion, at the point of finding the difference between misconstrued rational discussion and probabilistic empirical discussion.
Get an argument.
Infinity applies to no count. It is a process of counting without end. No matter where you are in your count you are infinitely away from the finish. You cannot approach the finish no less have a finish.
Nothing has the quantity "infinity".
And nothing is infinite meters wide. Infinity is not a quantity.
It is the process of an expanding width without end.
The infinite what is not a process?
What are you talking about?