• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Bomb#20's latest activity

 
 
 
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread England headed for A Caliphate.
    If so, what’s your point? Do you think the immigration of the Jews into Palestine was, on the whole, good for the Palestinians?
  • B
    Bomb#20 reacted to ideologyhunter's post in the thread US government map of Africa mislabels every country at global conference with Haha Haha.
    What a trivial mistake to joke about. Look, when Albania and Azerbaijan were on the brink of war, Trump stepped in and brokered a...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    He didn’t say you said it was impermissible; he said your argument implies it’s baby-killing. Whether you consider baby-killing...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    It isn’t. Your own link doesn’t support you. Note the word “adult”. You’re committing an equivocation fallacy. She said “a human”...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    If you’re piloting a plane, your passengers are living on your blood oxygen.
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    Well, I admit I have generally been ignoring what people weren’t arguing. In my defense I can only plead lack of the telepathic powers...
  • B
    Bomb#20 reacted to Elixir's post in the thread Roe v Wade is on deck with Haha Haha.
    Well, now they have! Sounds like a great idea, too. Especially for whoever gets to force them to fight. I think it recalls the...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    Oh, I see. Sorry to be confusing. I didn’t mention the other implications because they weren’t pertinent to the specific point in...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    You appear to be hastily generalizing. Maybe they do and maybe they don’t. The right to a boxing match doesn’t follow from bodily...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    :consternation2: How the bejesus did you get that out of what I wrote? I implied nothing of the sort. Of course no one has to...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    I’m not equating them; I’m just showing by counterexample that “can” doesn’t imply “have the right to”. If the presence of the...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    Just because someone can back out of the duel doesn’t mean he does back out; and just because he doesn’t back out and consequently gets...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    You jumped from “have the right to” to “can”. You can slap a cop. That doesn’t show you have the right to slap a cop. This isn’t...
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    Your use of “also” implies they have the right to accept, not just refuse. Show your work. This isn’t complicated.
  • B
    Bomb#20 replied to the thread Roe v Wade is on deck.
    “Also”?
Show older items
Back
Top Bottom