This is patently false. Their vote would have the same value as every other vote. Here’s what happened in 2016: a large number of Florida voters cast their ballot for Clinton, helping her to collect more votes than anyone else in the race. Under the electoral college, their votes had no value...
"The end of an error." MAGA World is imploding.
https://www.wired.com/story/rip-cybertruck-you-were-unloved-unwanted-and-utterly-absurd/?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us
Everyone’s vote counting equally disenfranchises no one. The electoral college gives a much higher value to some votes. It also allows candidates to virtually ignore 3/4 of the states when campaigning.
https://fairvote.org/archives/the_electoral_college-population_vs_electoral_votes/
The prospect of states agreeing to circumvent the Electoral College by awarding electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote has been around for a while. It has gotten nowhere because the states that have signed on do not represent a majority of the votes. That could change in...
Impeachment of judges would get nowhere, and distract from the real issues.
If Alito retires today, they’ll nominate someone next week. They’ll put up with all the blowback to put another fascist on the court. The only obstacle would be if a couple republicans grew a conscience and repeatedly...
Alito will retire and be replaced before the Democrats take over. There’s no mechanism for them to stall until January. Thomas has apparently decided that he can’t afford to give up the bribes, so he’ll hang around.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.