Recent content by Lion IRC

The same page informs us that... "The origin of life (OOL) problem remains one of the more challenging scientific questions of all time." The problem. The problem that remains. ...the problem for atheism. And I would counter that there is also "broad agreement" that God initiated the...

You obviously can't read pal. And you clearly struggle with the quote function because you have not reproduced the quote where I allegedly denied saying there's evidence for God. Let's sort out this communication problem first just to make sure it's worth moving on to a discussion of what I...

That's right Learner. We can look at extraordinary 'things' and so ...meh, that's just...ho hum...always existed, nothing special, accidental, illusion of design.. Or we can accept the parsimonious idea that if it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's...

Evidence for a Creator- Exhibit "A" We didn't cause ourselves to exist. We haven't always existed. Past-eternal time plus chance can't explain our existence because because that would entail inevitability and the enigma of our prior absence until now.

I'm being bombarded with questions about God and theodicy and the bible in a Forum labelled "Natural Science". And I'm the one being accused of bringing up these (off topic) bait-and-switch points. Ask Thomas (or the Mods) if its OK to argue about the evidence for God in this thread.

If the accusation is merely that I said theres scientific evidence for God, I proudly agree

Look who introduced the topic of evidence for God.

Just quote the post where I introduce God and/or the bible and/or evidence for same. That was the accusation. That I introduced the topic.

I think stars are are an excellent source of light and arguably the only source of light. I think "The Sun" and "The Moon" are the names/descriptions assigned to things that were instigated at Day 1 (Big Bang) and the description of their creation becomes more 'granular' as the biblical...

Eeeuw??? That's the best you can muster? pood says that I raised the following points; What is the “scientific evidence” that God exists? What is the “scientific evidence” that God causes good stuff to happen? All you have to do is quote the post which makes a claim that you want me to justify.

And I'm asking which one?

Yeah...I don't think you can. Here's the quote where you think I tried to smuggle "talking snakes and an invisible bearded tooth fairy" into the thread.

Yes. Do you understand what that means? Do you know how? It will save you a ton of work

I understand the text as saying first light was created, which I take to be unnamed stars/galaxies, then later, specific localised names and descriptions were assigned. (Eg. Day and Night.) Yes, I understand the claim. There were already mornings and evenings on the first day (Genesis 1:5) and...

3. 3rd ...comes after 2.