• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.
M

Latest activity Postings About

    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      When you “discipline” claims “by restricting” them such that they do not take account of author subjectivity, you ignore all emotive...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      A purposefully ignorant method guarantees a decisively ignorant result.
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      That is a lie. You admit that you ignore the person of the author. Ignoring effects ignorance. You are purposely ignorant, and your...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      You have once again proven my point. You have NOT taken any emotive possibility into account. What you admit to having done is ignore...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      You have never taken account of the emotive, and, in particular, you never considered whether it is possible that there is an emotive...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      You are wrong yet again. What you call "tone" is functional, observable, and operative and is what gives rise to reasonably positing...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      Yet another misrepresentation by you. What I actually say is that for so long as an emotive full-account-possibility is viable...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      If you are familiar with emotion and, thereby, the emotive, if you have experienced the emotive as the prime generator for the manner of...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      False. I say that in the presence of the emotive, since the emotive - via observation and experience - is known as a possibility which...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      You are wrong. If the emotive is present - and it most definitely is and has most definitely has been established as present and actual...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      Your above cited bizarre remark was in response to me saying that "your polemic is a possibility so long as the emotive possibility is...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      That is why your polemic is a possibility so long as the emotive possibility is not established as fully accounting for the manner of...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      Emotive possibility was never included in your list of considered factors. Now you apparently feel the need to include it as if it were...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      Yes it does. Figuratively speaking. It is just that you do not understand the relation between compartment-thinking, logic, and...
    • M
      Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
      I did not veto the possibility-to-actuality transformation. I guess you could say that logic vetoes it. Logically, emotion (viable...
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top Bottom