Michael S. Pearl's latest activity
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.That is a flaw in the logic of the "we" regardless of who the "we" are and regardless of what is the field in which the "we" work...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.That "about the actual world" means "in reality". If that "history" is not an aspect of the actual world or reality, then it is either...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.A domain can be a subset. In the context at hand, the "In history" domain is a subset of reality. If the history domain is a subset of...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Is "In history" a subset of "In reality" such that "In history" serves to indicate investigation restricted to a particular perspective...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.I said, "Logic is form. Logic is not content. Logic is not a truth expression. Logic can be used as a tool for producing true...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity."'Truth' in logic" is form (formalism) that is independent of - and without concern for - content. That is vacuity at least because, as...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.That is vacuous because it leaves "truth" utterly without characterization. Being vacuous, that notion is insufficient for any purpose...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.The logical necessity of entailment only regards all possibilities having been taken into account such that only one of those...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.False. It is only "logically necessary" which means true in all possible cases. Logically necessary is not the only sort of...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.False with regards to not necessarily, and false with regards to factually. Expressions presented factually are expressions of fact...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Your notion is both unsupported and illogical. No reason has been supplied explaining how it is that because someone makes a statement...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.False. It is talk in terms of what contributes to what became determinate. If a factor is itself not sufficient for what follows, then...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Your interpretation does not fit with Paul's emphasis on the importance of understanding as an always personal development. Therefore...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.What you are referring to as “ethical importance” was not intended as that “evidential weight” which you insistently and irrationally...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Paul claims to have been divinely inspired. Not even Paul thought his understanding was caused by God. The understanding and its...