Michael S. Pearl's latest activity
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Your above cited bizarre remark was in response to me saying that "your polemic is a possibility so long as the emotive possibility is...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.That is why your polemic is a possibility so long as the emotive possibility is not established as fully accounting for the manner of...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Emotive possibility was never included in your list of considered factors. Now you apparently feel the need to include it as if it were...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Yes it does. Figuratively speaking. It is just that you do not understand the relation between compartment-thinking, logic, and...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.I did not veto the possibility-to-actuality transformation. I guess you could say that logic vetoes it. Logically, emotion (viable...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity."Emotive" was NOT used as a veto. I said, "The emotive can subsume the polemic." Note the word can. That means it is possible for...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Paul's letter is reasonably interpreted as emotional, and that presents an emotive possibility which is sufficient to preclude...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Emotive and polemic do not have to be mutually exclusive. They can both be possible together in the same context. They can both be...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.As I said, you make an actuality claim. Below, you provide further confirmation. The viable emotive possibility alone, for so long as...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.If the "Methodological discipline" (and, thereby, the "public warrant") does not include taking into account of the distinction between...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.That is a flaw in the logic of the "we" regardless of who the "we" are and regardless of what is the field in which the "we" work...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.That "about the actual world" means "in reality". If that "history" is not an aspect of the actual world or reality, then it is either...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.A domain can be a subset. In the context at hand, the "In history" domain is a subset of reality. If the history domain is a subset of...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.Is "In history" a subset of "In reality" such that "In history" serves to indicate investigation restricted to a particular perspective...
-
MMichael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.I said, "Logic is form. Logic is not content. Logic is not a truth expression. Logic can be used as a tool for producing true...