• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

NoHolyCows's latest activity

  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Evaluating the content on human merits is exactly what I’m doing—and on that ground Paul’s letters read as ordinary Greco-Roman...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to DLH's post in the thread Define God with Like Like.
    Okay. Why do you think the atheists created such a God? But they are our creation, we are not theirs, correct? We are playthings to...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to pood's post in the thread Define God with Like Like.
    Hmmm … :unsure: Nah.
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to Gospel's post in the thread Define God with Like Like.
    God is all things, yet not a thing; Everywhere yet nowhere. The never was that will always be. God is what many believe they grasp, only...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Personal experiences can have public effects, but their contents remain private until independently verified—and even then, what becomes...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Anecdote is indeed a kind of evidence—but for third parties it is the weakest class of evidence until it is independently checked. For...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    A claim is testable only if it yields observable consequences that discriminate it from natural explanations. For “divinely inspired”...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Paul did not treat origin as a tangent; he weaponized it. Galatians opens by staking his commission “not from men,” and he immediately...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Then you have conceded my point. A claim that is, by definition, private and inaccessible to public testing cannot underwrite a public...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    If divine inspiration is neither non-human speech nor invariant content, you have stripped it of every objective marker that could...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    A lot of hot air and no substance on the topic.
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to Elixir's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Haha Haha.
    I hate words like “exegesis”. There’s nothing special about the explanation of a religious text that requires its own special term...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to Politesse's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    Imagine being proud of sounding dumb!
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    “Plain meaning” in textual analysis is not mind-reading; it is the best-supported communicative content recoverable from public...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    You’re right that other commenters used the word “plagiarism.” I did not. My point was (and is) independent of that claim: whether or...
Back
Top Bottom