• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

NoHolyCows's latest activity

  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    You’re conflating two different modalities. “Factual” means true of the actual case; “necessary” means true in all possible cases. Most...
  • NoHolyCows
    AvI Loeb is talking up the idea that ths is artificial, so you know right off it’s bullshit. :rolleyes:
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to Jimmy Higgins's post in the thread Define God with Like Like.
    Man, I'm getting a Timecube vibe. I've always said, if you are going to with stupidity, best to stick with the blatantly obvious kind...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to Jimmy Higgins's post in the thread Define God with Like Like.
    No, it isn't, however, organized religion certainly tried to sell that it was. Which is why, despite the Founding Fathers of science (in...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    A charismatic leader dies and there are close disciples left. Undoubtedly power struggles occur to one degree or another. Decisions...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Two different claims are being conflated. Whether Paul “necessarily intended” an appeal to authority is a question about psychology...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    It’s neither. In public reasoning, an origin claim is warranted only if it yields observations that are more expected on that claim than...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    Trump anointed by god. Trump invoked god after it happened, god sawed him. The old divijne authority scam. There are Christians who...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    In every serious framework for causal reasoning—science, history, law, and analytic philosophy—“contributing factor” is causal language...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Paul’s emphasis on personal understanding does not negate that he also makes a public causal-source claim about origin; the two are...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    https://home.csulb.edu/~cwallis/100/aquinas.html Aquinas was the RCC 'hit man; he went around debating dissent. I read A guide For...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    I wonder if what Mr Pearl posts is divinely inspired or is he using what we generally refer to as Greek philosophy and logic to make am...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to DBT's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    If divine inspiration/ not the work of man is false, the bible is merely the work of man, a testament to what someone, human and...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    It isn’t nonsense to apply one neutral rule: when someone makes a public origin claim (“not of human origin”), that claim needs public...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Good—then we agree they’re different categories. Paul’s public claim “not of human origin” is an evidential claim about cause. Such a...
Back
Top Bottom