• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

NoHolyCows's latest activity

  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    Logic form and content? P1: God exists P2: Paul said his words came from god not men. C: Therefore Paul was inspired by god with no...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    History/historian 2000 years ago does not have the meaning as today. An academic or professional historian today is expected to have a...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    “In history” names a domain of inquiry, not a different species of truth. Historical questions are about past states of the same...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to bilby's post in the thread Corporations are People? with Like Like.
    They are corporations. Corporations are legal fictions created by governments. People are primates of the species Homo Sapiens. Now...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Ignoring a possibility is not eliminating it; it is refusing to test it. Elimination requires showing that the observations are at least...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    It is directly responsive. “Decisive difference between a private conviction and a public warrant” states the criterion at issue. A...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Modern logic separates syntax from semantics. Syntax (the “form”) gives you well-formed formulas and proof rules; semantics gives you...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Sorry. No.” is not an argument. The point at issue is simple: when a writer publicly deploys an origin claim (“not of man … through...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    I’m not claiming a context-free necessity; I’m making a contextual, historical claim about how Paul deploys origin language in...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    That is simply incorrect. In modern logic, “truth” is not a free-floating formality; it is defined semantically by satisfaction in a...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to ideologyhunter's post in the thread Define God with Like Like.
    Scripture tells us authoritatively that God appeared to at least three persons. Abraham gets to meet him in the form of three dudes in...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    From an atheist perspective, the key point is that powerful religious experiences are real to the people who have them, but their...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Define God.
    What a scientist believes is not what science has detected. Science “detects” by generating testable predictions, measuring signals that...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    “Truth” in logic is not vacuous; it is the semantic notion of a statement being satisfied in a structure. “Entailment” means that in...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    I’m not offering a “possibility”; I’m describing what the letter does on the page. In Gal 1:11–12 Paul states his gospel is “not from...
Back
Top Bottom