• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

NoHolyCows's latest activity

  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    No, logic does not “veto” actuality here. If a category is defined by observable operations in a text, then observing those operations...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    You did use it as a veto earlier when you wrote that the emotive reading “is sufficient to preclude establishing polemic actuality.”...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Emotion does not negate function. A document can be both emotional and polemical at once because tone and argumentative role are...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Agreed. On that shared premise, nothing about the presence of emotion undermines identifying polemic where the text exhibits it...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Love Love.
    About 15 years ago I was invited by an Evangelical to be a judge at a regional Christian hoe school debate tournament. I(t was a big 3...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Correct—my claim of actuality is about the letter’s observable rhetoric, not about the truth of Paul’s origin claim. Galatians itself...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    Well, if nothing else the debate has been a good vocabulary builder for a low brow hoi poloi like me.
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Historical method already bakes that distinction in. We treat hypotheses as possible until observations discriminate among them; only...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    It isn’t a flaw; it’s the core of rational inference. The likelihood requirement—prefer the hypothesis under which the observations are...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Right—history is about reality. My point was never ontological shrink-wrapping; it was methodological demarcation. “In history” names...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to Elixir's post in the thread Corporations are People? with Like Like.
    That's the nut of contention around here. As so often is the case, the difference of opinions may be real, but it is obfuscated...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Yes—fields proceed by adopting a best-supported hypothesis provisionally and revising if counterevidence appears. That practice depends...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    “In history” names a method, not a smaller reality. When historians say something is historically true, they are making a claim about...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    Logic form and content? P1: God exists P2: Paul said his words came from god not men. C: Therefore Paul was inspired by god with no...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to steve_bank's post in the thread Origins Of Christianity with Like Like.
    History/historian 2000 years ago does not have the meaning as today. An academic or professional historian today is expected to have a...
Back
Top Bottom