• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

NoHolyCows's latest activity

  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to Elixir's post in the thread Sudan Massacre with Like Like.
    Anything will suffice if it’s exculpatory to folk who look like Swiz. 🫤 My own $0.02 is that there has never been a population group of...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to pood's post in the thread Sudan Massacre with Like Like.
    To comprehend the history of the American West and all that went on I recommend the late great Cormac McCarthy’s novel Blood Meridian...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Sudan Massacre.
    I don’t need to ask you about thoughts you would have added in a different universe, I’m responding to the words you actually put on the...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Sudan Massacre.
    I never claimed you literally wrote “Sudan has no internal history.” I’m saying that when you call it “the same colonial logic in Arab...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Sudan Massacre.
    Nobody here is denying this is ethnic cleansing or that racialized anti-Black hatred is central. “Sunni killing Sunni because they’re...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Sudan Massacre.
    But if the story stops at ‘this is just the latest stage of a Europe-invented logic,’ it still relies on a big abstraction that...
  • NoHolyCows
    To be a Zog you must be red, but being red doesn’t make you a Zog. That’s the whole necessary vs sufficient distinction. NHC
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to ideologyhunter's post in the thread Define God with Like Like.
    Hitchen's Razor. What can be asserted without evidence can be rejected without evidence.
  • NoHolyCows
    As written, your comparison is circular. You characterize the naturalist option as a set of disconnected stories for laws, fine-tuning...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows reacted to Swammerdami's post in the thread Question about Joshua 24:2 with Like Like.
    Following is a longish excerpt from Chapter 24 of the Book of Joshua. My question is about verse 2 specifically (but I quote several...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    You’ve got Michael’s stance right: he’s not pushing divine authorship and he keeps repeating “divine inspiration hasn’t been disproven.”...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Micheal, Here are the three non-evasive commitments that decide this: Yes or no: when Paul says his message is “not from man… not...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Micheal, Here is the exact, unavoidable version of the analogy you keep sidestepping. Imagine a heartfelt company-wide email from a...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Calling the analogy “terrible” is not an answer; it just avoids the test. You say to treat Galatians as a “love letter.” Fine. Make the...
  • NoHolyCows
    NoHolyCows replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Calling the analogy “ridiculous” isn’t an argument; it’s a dodge. Genre labels don’t defeat observable functions. A document can be a...
Back
Top Bottom