Search results for query: *

Have you read post #126? No, of course not. Toni posted what Toni's dad thinks. You think referencing that post is "disgusting and rude".

Oh, you forgot about this post. By implication you are saying Manning did try to break into ... whatever, you aren't bothered by your own double standards, why should I be bothered by your double standards. He hurt your patron saint, he embarrassed the holy government. The sinner must be...

By that token, Bush is hereby absolved of the entire war on terror. After all, he only gave the orders, he didn't fly any of the jets, drop any of the bombs, or shoot any of the guns. The lengths you will go to in order to excuse your patron saint. :rolleyes:

I support the 1957 civil rights act and the 1960 civil rights act. There's a reason many people who supported the 1957 act and the 1960 act opposed the 1964 act, and many people who opposed the 1957 act and the 1960 act supported the 1964 act. You did know there were other civil rights acts...

Does it matter? Goldwater was a good candidate.

That is what is alleged. However, in your post you accused him of trying to break into the server, not assisting Manning in doing so. Guilt as an accomplice is still guilt, that much is true, but that's not what you wrote.

It is your position that Assange himself, not Manning, was the one trying to break into a top secret server? Assange himself was collecting the data he was reporting? Even the U.S. Government didn't go that far in what they were trying to charge him with before the plea bargain. They accused...

That sounds like something a trumpsucker would say.

The system is designed to exclude alternatives. That's why for the entire 21st century thus far we've had to choose between a turd sandwich and a giant douche.

LD is good at bad faith responses. He plead guilty to a bullshit charge. If Woodward and Bernstein had been held to the same standard as Assange, Nixon would have finished his second term in peace.

We've got one heck of a derail going.

Keep talking like that and people are going to call you a MAGA fanatic Trump supporter.

You admitted my post is not babble, and so you want me to try again. That's weird.

Keep talking like that and they're going to call you a Trump supporter.

He lost his train of thought on several occasions, but he didn't freeze up, wander away, or poop himself. He didn't even talk about hiking in the foothills of the Himalayas. Whatever they gave him before the debate, it must be potent stuff.

Yes. Everyone else understands what I mean by "even if the party affiliation is different."

I know I'm committing sacrilege by equating the second greatest saint in US politics to the second greatest sinner in US politics, but I really do see "bomb them all" as the same as "bomb them all", even if the party affiliation is different.

Even though we have the same candidates in 2024 as we had in 2020, we have worse candidates in 2024 than we had in 2020. I hate to say it but this debate was actually dull. Neither candidate did anything out of the ordinary. Trump didn't go on a tirade, Biden didn't lose himself in a senior...

So "Bomb them all" has nothing in common with "Bomb them all". Got it.

I managed to get an pre-debate picture of the two contestants.