Search results for query: *

The context was 10/7. Who was attacked? No, you didn't. You pretended it wasn't applicable. The comparison is simple: 10/7 = George Floyd. You're turning it around and responding police lives matter.

1) Continuity error. There weren't tracks on the ground, then there were--but if the video is true there wasn't any vehicle there to leave the tracks. 2) The door positions are wrong. The driver's door isn't open enough for anyone to have been removed--but there's nobody there. The...

What's dubious about it? How are they different? You still aren't addressing the point.

Israel got permission from the families to release some of that horrific video they previously had only shown to reporters. This is a mix of combat video taken by Hamas, security cameras and interrogation videos. Remember, the combat video is what Hamas crows about, it does not represent...

Debunked how? The Islamists in Europe manage to rack up higher scores with ramming attacks than our mass shooters. They're pretty much limited to people near streets but in dense areas there are lots of those.

And some more about the "starvation". A while back I posted the UN link that showed huge diversion and only counts what the UN handles. Turns out there's also an Israeli count: https://gaza-aid-data.gov.il/main/ 2.4 pounds/day/person average over the whole time.

Why should we trust the aid workers? Their own video damns them, it's staged. You'll need to be logged in to read the explanation.

The issue is what the video said, not what Z said.

Couple of problems with that: 1) Making such a device requires that the explosives be very near the propane tank. 2) The secondary blast came from within the building, thus if it was a fuel-air blast it's from one room. And propane won't burn above 10%. That secondary boom was explosives...

Yeah, but so what? This amounts to accusation = punishment. You find that acceptable?

But the lawyers would get the records in such a lawsuit. And the problem is that the accused is generally not allowed to present their side. Kangaroo court. No, we are talking about suing the school. That's normally contingency.

What is with everyone not getting it about contingency fees? This isn't about defense, this is about suing the school over what happened.

Civil. Such cases are usually taken on contingency, lawyers care very much about whether they expect to win when taking a case.

It's not the issue of the content. It's the issue that Qatari money comes with Qatari influence. How would you react if you had learned that Moscow funded the movies?

Because it's a show of force, not an actual effort to do something useful.

The politicians have consistently abused their power in this matter, therefore I think it's better for it to be set to zero. You can still tax the company on the profits.

Because the Gestapo is trying to run up a score. Going after legal immigrants on the flimsiest of pretexts. (Like the woman where someone else in the group kept a fish they should have thrown back.) Emergency preparedness in the Gestapo era. I sure hope you have scuba equipment as you are...

I have no problem with adjusting the cap. It's just it should be reciprocal--raise the cap, raise the maximum benefit. Absolutely not. 1) Means testing on something the majority of the population receives is not a good idea in the first place, you spend too much for what you save. 2)...

The gun control bit is all emotions and/or lies. Facts we present get ignored. Basically all proposals from the left are do-something things that either will do pretty much nothing or will disarm the law abiding while doing little to the criminals. Suicide data is routinely mixed with...

I was talking about stuff you're taxed on without actually getting. You get the money eventually, but you're taxed on it when it accrues even though you can't actually use it at that point.