Search results for query: *

not sure what your point is, the energy ov the charges is what caused the collapse, but, (see next) wrong, normal office fires do not melt steel, and did not on 9/11; this has been accepted by all parties for years now but molten steel and iron will stay molten for months, as documented, since...

your explanation is wrong. if some jackoff [edit] on an internet forum has it all figured out, then why cant people who are actually qualified, and not 'truthers', figure it out? intergranular just does not mean what you want it to. it means 'between individual grains' causing total melting...

[citation needed] but irrelevant, as its more than hot enough to melt steel, as documented in South Tower Smoking Guns, South Tower Smoking Guns (Follow-up), Rockets at the World Trade Center, High Speed Massive Projectiles from the WTC on 9/11, and this interview with Niels Harrit at 3:36-4:33...

act like a child and ye shall be treated like a child. you obviously arent interested in having a real debate since you have to rely on strawman arguments; you may as well stop now thermite and the steel it melted in an insulated envirnoment would stay hot for weeks, and even months as was...

oh, ok. you havent been listening then youre really grasping at straws. intrgranular doesnt mean what youre trying to twist it into; it merely means between the individual grains ov metal at no point does fema use the words shock or impact, but they do use the terms unusual high-temperatures...

the full statement i am referring to is "in order to be doing science, a hypothesis must be accompanied by a statement in the spirt of "...of course, if we found X, that would refute this"", which is exactly how i am using it. the official conspiracy theory is only true 'until we find x, which...

more ov your baseless assertions and cherry picking one quote out ov an entire paper and ignoring everything else does not an argument make when fema says melted, they dont actually mean melted; 'loren logic'

you havent been looking you are missing the point. what caused the 'mangled and corroded' (melted as per femas report) and what is the source ov the sulfur? what temperatures could be high enough to cause to such damage. only termate can cause both ov the phenomenon wrong. basic...

yes you all like to remind me, but as i said to loren, the world doesnt stop turning because you stopped searching, my child. evidence is available now that wasnt before, or those you debated before werent sufficiently informed, or you were denying the evidence when did i say thermite wasnt...

'is too' is all your claims have, not mine. all my assertions are backed up by the evidence (you wont look at) which you either were not aware ov (or were already ignoring) at the time ov your original arguments, or was not even available at the time the postulate about 'if we find x' is a...

it also produces more energy than normal thermite, and can be applied like paint, allowing it to be more versatile in application what is this, elementary school? Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe thermite also produces specific...

the fact that 9/11 was an govt abetted inside job, false flag event is a political discussion gotta try to hide the truth, seeing as no one can refute the evidence presented, just like on the previous board

youre not quite the expert you think you are, as fema did classify the metal as melted, as you will see at the bottom ov this post, refuting your assertion that fema did not do so and again, you have nothing to say about the fused cross or other evidence. avoiding the evidence isnt science, but...

thats all you have to say? nothing about the abundance ov other points which also discredit the study? i shouldnt even have to say that the whole point ov science is repeatability, and if an experiment does not replicate the previous experiment, that is in fact, not science millette has even...

yes you are fond ov saying so. i thought we were all adults here, but apparently loren needs to realize that the world keeps on turning whether or not he is searching, and that some evidence was either not available until after such times, or was not known to those at the time, or as i have...

firstly, i didnt know chris mohr was the rev. chris mohr --- the foundation ov frdbs and the 'debunkers' 'science' relies on this mans 'expertise' i would have replied sooner, but like capt. haddock here, ive been pursuing the more intellectually invigorating activity ov getting my drink on...

same goes to you actually, you were referring to the notion that those who may think they are playing by the rules ov argumentation are in fact not, implying that you wouldnt commit to a debate on that basis, with no proof ov that being the case, thus an ad hom it is an ad hominem due to the...

it is thus further confirming my point ad hominem do you not have absolute faith that if you jump off a building you will fall? thats what were dealing with here. everything else is, surprise, more ad hominem more ad hominem, and you sound like a flat-earther

as is the case with the proponents ov the official story, but its an ad hominem when applied to me point in case. another ad hominem. there is an immense amount ov information in the videos which you cannot hand wave away. and you didnt address the articles im sure you havent read the...

by knowing when 1+1=2 you do plato a great disservice