This blog post was inspired by my participation in a thread on subsequent domestic violence allegations against George Zimmerman. The case naturally came up again and the sides started reasserting themselves. The majority view seemed exasperated and incensed that "pro-Zimmerman" perspectives...
Who would like to see someone do a movie on this guy? Appetizer: "The truth is unspeakable," says real-life American sniper who wants nothing to do with a dangerous propaganda film"...
Does anyone else see the logical connection between a cautionary note about armchair quarterbacking (with regard to what someone "should have done" in a pulse-pounding situation) and a prohibition on making judgments? What sort of irrationality is at play here?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.