Anonymous To Out GOP Pedophiles

[Jarhyn]

Reddit has had several lists of GOP predators over the years. Anonymous simply had to scrape Reddit for their hit list. The rest is presentation. Showmanship. A slide show with loud rock music. Who's their intended audience? I seem to remember a lot of such lists in the past few years.

What would be fun is a well made online website. Where one could search categories. Rapists. Child porn collectors. Child molesters. Etc.

Every state I know of has a sexual predator website. The Louisiana site allows searches by zip code. There are differing requirements between the states, so it's not totally consistent. In Louisiana, any sex crime which involved a minor gets you on the list. This includes those who had sex with a 17 year old, and was at least 2 years older than their partner. Such a person will have a drivers license which has SEXUAL PREDATOR stamped in large red letters across the front, just like everyone else on the list.

It wouldn't be a lot of work to cross reference these websites with any other online list, or simply do a Google search on the names and see how many City Councilmen or county supervisors appear.

Personally, I think that such folks should be castrated, and have it put right there on their ID as to why, as is done, as you said. It shows such a stunning lack of judgement that it is extremely hard to justify their continued ability to reproduce.

There are quite a few women on the list. I'm not sure what you would do to them.

Throw them in prison? Not really sure. Maybe ask Emily what she would have done with them. Definitely still mark them as a sex offender on their ID?

 

[Loren Pechtel]

I was addressing why they didn't go to the police.

Who says that they didn't?

Why would they, if everyone(including the police) already knew that they were doing it?

You seem to be assuming that they found out stuff that nobody else, including the police, knew about. I sincerely doubt that is true. The cops probably already knew, but chose against following up, because:

Ya know.
Boys will be boys.
They love it when you grab em by the pussy.
Trump is trying to Make America Great Again! Don't want to interfere with that, unless you're a niggrer loving socialist who wants to take away our guns...

You aren't, are you?
Tom

The question was asked why they didn't take their evidence to the cops rather than publishing it. I was pointing out they almost certainly have nothing they can take to the cops.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

My point is that this is not "pedophilia" and that it should not be illegal, not that I want to engage in such a relationship myself. I think high age of consent does more harm than good, i.e. a 21 year old with 17 year old girlfriend put on a "sex offender registry" for the rest of his life is cruel and unusual punishment. Also, how would you define "grooming"? What if the younger person is initiating? Still "grooming" by fiat?

That's why you need Romeo and Juliet laws.

 

[Jarhyn]

My point is that this is not "pedophilia" and that it should not be illegal, not that I want to engage in such a relationship myself. I think high age of consent does more harm than good, i.e. a 21 year old with 17 year old girlfriend put on a "sex offender registry" for the rest of his life is cruel and unusual punishment. Also, how would you define "grooming"? What if the younger person is initiating? Still "grooming" by fiat?

That's why you need Romeo and Juliet laws.

The fact is, yes, it's still grooming if the younger person is initiating. Grooming is the act of ACCEPTING and DIRECTING a younger person's sexual desires at inappropriate targets.

The mind naturally becomes fairly swamped with sexual feelings at that age, and the act of grooming is specifically directing that in manipulative ways so that an adult, someone who knows better, is the recipient and outlet for those feelings.

It does not matter who suggests it first, who starts the conversation, because the act of grooming is ANY participation in a conversation like that that is not "NO. This is a vulnerable age, and while you MAY have feelings that are hard to grasp or understand, this is not appropriate. It is fine to explore these feelings on your own, but for now, you must know it is abusive for someone who is significantly older OR younger to participate with you. Have relationships and make your mistakes on your own and with people your own age".

I've said this to, HAD to say this to... Maybe 3 different people? One of them was one of those two people I later overheard talking, who I mentioned before as trying to blackmail adults. Obviously, not everyone they contacted said similar things, and the result was, predictably, someone with a twisted view of consent who will go on to be exactly the thing they blackmailed... Or worse, encourage other people, kids, to follow their footsteps.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

My point is that this is not "pedophilia" and that it should not be illegal, not that I want to engage in such a relationship myself. I think high age of consent does more harm than good, i.e. a 21 year old with 17 year old girlfriend put on a "sex offender registry" for the rest of his life is cruel and unusual punishment. Also, how would you define "grooming"? What if the younger person is initiating? Still "grooming" by fiat?

That's why you need Romeo and Juliet laws.

The fact is, yes, it's still grooming if the younger person is initiating. Grooming is the act of ACCEPTING and DIRECTING a younger person's sexual desires at inappropriate targets.

Huh? Romeo and Juliet laws are specifically about avoiding problematic situations while not making sex categorically forbidden for those under the threshold.

 

[Jarhyn]

My point is that this is not "pedophilia" and that it should not be illegal, not that I want to engage in such a relationship myself. I think high age of consent does more harm than good, i.e. a 21 year old with 17 year old girlfriend put on a "sex offender registry" for the rest of his life is cruel and unusual punishment. Also, how would you define "grooming"? What if the younger person is initiating? Still "grooming" by fiat?

That's why you need Romeo and Juliet laws.

The fact is, yes, it's still grooming if the younger person is initiating. Grooming is the act of ACCEPTING and DIRECTING a younger person's sexual desires at inappropriate targets.

Huh? Romeo and Juliet laws are specifically about avoiding problematic situations while not making sex categorically forbidden for those under the threshold.

I'm specifically talking things past 21+17, 18+16, 16+14, etc.

The fact is that I WOULD categorically forbid such relationships, and dramatically improve sexual education.

The fact is that sexual relationships outside such bounds are simply WAY too imbalanced in terms of experience and expectations, and even those who think they are the exception are NOT the exception, and beyond the numbers I pointed out, it's just not going to be symmetrical enough to really represent consent, and anyone who thinks it could be is deluded and either being groomed, or grooming.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

My point is that this is not "pedophilia" and that it should not be illegal, not that I want to engage in such a relationship myself. I think high age of consent does more harm than good, i.e. a 21 year old with 17 year old girlfriend put on a "sex offender registry" for the rest of his life is cruel and unusual punishment. Also, how would you define "grooming"? What if the younger person is initiating? Still "grooming" by fiat?

That's why you need Romeo and Juliet laws.

The fact is, yes, it's still grooming if the younger person is initiating. Grooming is the act of ACCEPTING and DIRECTING a younger person's sexual desires at inappropriate targets.

Huh? Romeo and Juliet laws are specifically about avoiding problematic situations while not making sex categorically forbidden for those under the threshold.

I'm specifically talking things past 21+17, 18+16, 16+14, etc.

The fact is that I WOULD categorically forbid such relationships, and dramatically improve sexual education.

The fact is that sexual relationships outside such bounds are simply WAY too imbalanced in terms of experience and expectations, and even those who think they are the exception are NOT the exception, and beyond the numbers I pointed out, it's just not going to be symmetrical enough to really represent consent, and anyone who thinks it could be is deluded and either being groomed, or grooming.

Do you not understand Romeo and Juliet laws? They're about permitting relationships within the ranges you're giving, not about relationships outside them.

 

[Jarhyn]

My point is that this is not "pedophilia" and that it should not be illegal, not that I want to engage in such a relationship myself. I think high age of consent does more harm than good, i.e. a 21 year old with 17 year old girlfriend put on a "sex offender registry" for the rest of his life is cruel and unusual punishment. Also, how would you define "grooming"? What if the younger person is initiating? Still "grooming" by fiat?

That's why you need Romeo and Juliet laws.

The fact is, yes, it's still grooming if the younger person is initiating. Grooming is the act of ACCEPTING and DIRECTING a younger person's sexual desires at inappropriate targets.

Huh? Romeo and Juliet laws are specifically about avoiding problematic situations while not making sex categorically forbidden for those under the threshold.

I'm specifically talking things past 21+17, 18+16, 16+14, etc.

The fact is that I WOULD categorically forbid such relationships, and dramatically improve sexual education.

The fact is that sexual relationships outside such bounds are simply WAY too imbalanced in terms of experience and expectations, and even those who think they are the exception are NOT the exception, and beyond the numbers I pointed out, it's just not going to be symmetrical enough to really represent consent, and anyone who thinks it could be is deluded and either being groomed, or grooming.

Do you not understand Romeo and Juliet laws? They're about permitting relationships within the ranges you're giving, not about relationships outside them.

Oh, I see where the disconnect is. I was offering an argument against Derec, not you. The usual pedophile MO is to talk about Romeo and Juliet laws and then jump over to "so what's so wrong about a 16 YO fucking a 40 year old?"