PyramidHead
Contributor
From the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/28/magazine/can-the-bacteria-in-your-gut-explain-your-mood.html?_r=0
I would not be surprised if it turned out that bacterially secreted neurotransmitters and other signaling molecules play a role in how we respond to stress and anxiety. So far, the only studies have been performed on animals:
The article doesn't provide any links to the original research, so I initially suspected it was a qualitative study in a minor journal, but it's actually a pretty nice article published in Cell (bolding mine):
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867413014736
Thoughts?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/28/magazine/can-the-bacteria-in-your-gut-explain-your-mood.html?_r=0
Until he joined his colleagues at Cork 10 years ago, Cryan thought about microbiology in terms of pathology: the neurological damage created by diseases like syphilis or H.I.V. ‘‘There are certain fields that just don’t seem to interact well,’’ he said. ‘‘Microbiology and neuroscience, as whole disciplines, don’t tend to have had much interaction, largely because the brain is somewhat protected.’’ He was referring to the fact that the brain is anatomically isolated, guarded by a blood-brain barrier that allows nutrients in but keeps out pathogens and inflammation, the immune system’s typical response to germs. Cryan’s study added to the growing evidence that signals from beneficial bacteria nonetheless find a way through the barrier. Somehow — though his 2011 paper could not pinpoint exactly how — micro-organisms in the gut tickle a sensory nerve ending in the fingerlike protrusion lining the intestine and carry that electrical impulse up the vagus nerve and into the deep-brain structures thought to be responsible for elemental emotions like anxiety. Soon after that, Cryan and a co-author, Ted Dinan, published a theory paper in Biological Psychiatry calling these potentially mind-altering microbes ‘‘psychobiotics.’’
I would not be surprised if it turned out that bacterially secreted neurotransmitters and other signaling molecules play a role in how we respond to stress and anxiety. So far, the only studies have been performed on animals:
Two years ago, Mazmanian published a study in the journal Cell with Elaine Hsiao, then a graduate student and now a neuroscientist at Caltech, and others, that made a provocative link between a single molecule and behavior. Their research found that mice exhibiting abnormal communication and repetitive behaviors, like obsessively burying marbles, were mollified when they were given one of two strains of the bacterium Bacteroides fragilis.
The article doesn't provide any links to the original research, so I initially suspected it was a qualitative study in a minor journal, but it's actually a pretty nice article published in Cell (bolding mine):
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867413014736
Consistent with the role of GI microbes in regulating intestinal permeability and metabolic homeostasis (Nicholson et al., 2012 and Wikoff et al., 2009), we show that B. fragilis treatment corrects MIA-associated changes in specific serum metabolites that appear to have a gut origin, suggesting B. fragilis may prevent leakage of harmful molecules from the GI lumen. In a proof-of-concept test of the this hypothesis, we reveal that the microbially-modulated metabolite 4EPS, which is elevated in the circulation by MIA and restored by B. fragilis treatment, is sufficient to induce anxiety-like behavior in naive mice. These data indicate that metabolomic changes contribute to the onset and/or persistence of autism-related behavioral abnormalities.
<snip>
We propose the transformative concept that autism, and likely other behavioral conditions, are potentially diseases involving the gut that ultimately impact the immune, metabolic, and nervous systems, and that microbiome-mediated therapies may be a safe and effective treatment for these neurodevelopmental disorders.
Thoughts?