http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...-cheney-defends-the-torture-innocents/383741/
Cheney is ok if 25% of the peopletortured enhancedly interrogated were innocent.
When pressed for a definition of torture Cheney could only babble this:
So for Cheney the CIA can do anything short of what the 9/11 attackers did and not have committed torture.
Okaaaaaaaaay . . .
Cheney is ok if 25% of the people
That exchange leaves no room for mistaking former vice-president Cheney's position: better to chain a man to the wall of a cell, douse him in cold water, and leave him there to freeze to death, even if he later turns out to be innocent, than to release that same man and risk not that he detonates a nuclear bomb in Manhattan, but that he ends up "on the battlefield," where there's a chance he could harm Americans. What if fully one-in-four prisoners tortured by the CIA were innocent?
Cheney is still unmoved:
CHUCK TODD:
Is that too high? You're okay with that margin for error?
DICK CHENEY:
I have no problem as long as we achieve our objective.
When pressed for a definition of torture Cheney could only babble this:
DICK CHENEY:
--in my mind, I've told you what meets the definition of torture. It's what 19 guys armed with airline tickets and box cutters did to 3,000 Americans on 9/11.
So for Cheney the CIA can do anything short of what the 9/11 attackers did and not have committed torture.
Okaaaaaaaaay . . .