Is paradigm shifts itself an expression of patriarchal oppression?

[DrZoidberg]

It's a really complicated, dare I say intellectually deep theory, you'll need to read the original article to keep up with the argument:

http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

Good luck! I would love to hear your comments.

 

[fast]

After two paragraphs, I proceeded to the end. Glad I did.

 

[bigfield]

It's a really complicated, dare I say intellectually deep theory, you'll need to read the original article to keep up with the argument:

http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

Good luck! I would love to hear your comments.

An interesting interpretation of dialectic subcapitalist discourse.

 

[jab]

It's a really complicated, dare I say intellectually deep theory, you'll need to read the original article to keep up with the argument:

http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

Good luck! I would love to hear your comments.

two badly written paragraphs of mostly gibberish, from near the beginning:
"The main theme of the works of Tarantino is the difference between
consciousness and society. But the subject is interpolated into a subsemiotic
nihilism that includes sexuality as a paradox. Any number of theories
concerning neocapitalist theory exist.

If one examines social realism, one is faced with a choice: either accept
neocapitalist theory or conclude that culture, ironically, has intrinsic
meaning. Thus, if Lyotardist narrative holds, the works of Tarantino are
postmodern. Social realism implies that the establishment is capable of
significance."

I typed that much, becag a critique of the placement and content of the last sentnece in teh first pargraph, and then went to teh end of the articel and then went to the end

 

[DrZoidberg]

It's a really complicated, dare I say intellectually deep theory, you'll need to read the original article to keep up with the argument:

http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

Good luck! I would love to hear your comments.

two badly written paragraphs of mostly gibberish, from near the beginning:
"The main theme of the works of Tarantino is the difference between
consciousness and society. But the subject is interpolated into a subsemiotic
nihilism that includes sexuality as a paradox. Any number of theories
concerning neocapitalist theory exist.

If one examines social realism, one is faced with a choice: either accept
neocapitalist theory or conclude that culture, ironically, has intrinsic
meaning. Thus, if Lyotardist narrative holds, the works of Tarantino are
postmodern. Social realism implies that the establishment is capable of
significance."

I typed that much, becag a critique of the placement and content of the last sentnece in teh first pargraph, and then went to teh end of the articel and then went to the end

You say "mostly gibberish". So what about the article wasn't gibberish? You seem to think some of the article had redeeming qualities. I'm just curious as to what you think they are?

 

[fromderinside]

Are you going for swallowing the sinker too?