lpetrich
Contributor
How Mitch McConnell Became Trump’s Enabler-in-Chief | The New Yorker - "The Senate Majority Leader’s refusal to rein in the President is looking riskier than ever."
The article described how he ran back to an event in his home state rather than work out an aid package for getting through the coronavirus pandemic. At that event, he joked that his opponents "“occasionally compare me to Darth Vader."
The two are very unlike in temperament. Trump is impulsive, and he almost can't control what he says. McConnell is much less talkative, and intent on playing the long game, as he himself describes it. Trump is very low in the Big Five trait of conscientiousness, while McConnell is likely at least average in it, making him much more typical of successful people than Trump is.
The article described how he ran back to an event in his home state rather than work out an aid package for getting through the coronavirus pandemic. At that event, he joked that his opponents "“occasionally compare me to Darth Vader."
When the bill finally passed, he tried to portray his involvement in it as a success.McConnell, a voracious reader of history, has been cultivating his place in it for many years. But, in leaving Washington for the long weekend, he had misjudged the moment. The hashtag #WheresMitch? was trending on Twitter. President Trump had declared a national emergency; the stock market had ended one of its worst weeks since the Great Recession. Nearly two thousand cases of COVID-19 had already been confirmed in America.
Eleven days later, the Senate still had not come up with a bill. The Times ran a scorching editorial titled “The Coronavirus Bailout Stalled. And It’s Mitch McConnell’s Fault.” The Majority Leader had tried to jam through a bailout package that heavily favored big business. But by then five Republicans were absent in self-quarantine, and the Democrats forced McConnell to accept a $2.1-trillion compromise bill that reduced corporate giveaways and expanded aid to health-care providers and to hard-hit workers.
That's been the case for Trump's entire Presidency. Bill Kristol describes him as “a pretty conventional Republican who just decided to go along and get what he could out of Trump.” “Demagogues like Trump, if they can get elected, can’t really govern unless they have people like McConnell,” he noted -- someone with a power base who is willing to enable him. “There’s been too much focus on the base, and not enough on business leaders, big donors, and the Wall Street Journal editorial page,” and “The Trump base would be there anyway, but the élites might have rebelled if not for McConnell. He could have fundamentally disrupted Trump’s control, but instead McConnell has kept the trains running.”Many have regarded McConnell’s support for Trump as a stroke of cynical political genius. ... Indeed, some critics argue that McConnell bears a singular responsibility for the country’s predicament. They say that he knew from the start that Trump was unequipped to lead in a crisis, but, because the President was beloved by the Republican base, McConnell protected him. He even went so far as to prohibit witnesses at the impeachment trial, thus guaranteeing that the President would remain in office.
The two are very unlike in temperament. Trump is impulsive, and he almost can't control what he says. McConnell is much less talkative, and intent on playing the long game, as he himself describes it. Trump is very low in the Big Five trait of conscientiousness, while McConnell is likely at least average in it, making him much more typical of successful people than Trump is.