Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
Have you been noticing the shotgun approach to defending the President, all over the place, logically inconsistent, flailing even?
Here are some contradictions I've noticed:
1. Republicans in the House claim they didn't have enough documents or witnesses for a trial. Meanwhile, the Senate Republicans say they want no documentation or witnesses.
2. Similarly, the Republicans claim they want both MORE time for the hearings and that the Democrats spent too much time on this issue, instead of others.
3. Lastly, they claim that abuse of power is an inapplicable article of impeachment because it's not a crime. At the same time, they are claiming the Democrats are guilty of it. One Republican went so far as to say if he were a judge, he'd find the Democrats guilty of it.
So what Republican contradictions are you noticing?
Here are some contradictions I've noticed:
1. Republicans in the House claim they didn't have enough documents or witnesses for a trial. Meanwhile, the Senate Republicans say they want no documentation or witnesses.
2. Similarly, the Republicans claim they want both MORE time for the hearings and that the Democrats spent too much time on this issue, instead of others.
3. Lastly, they claim that abuse of power is an inapplicable article of impeachment because it's not a crime. At the same time, they are claiming the Democrats are guilty of it. One Republican went so far as to say if he were a judge, he'd find the Democrats guilty of it.
So what Republican contradictions are you noticing?