Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
In another 5-4 ruling that most likely would have been a 4-5 ruling if Republicans didn't take over all 3 branches of government, the Supreme Court has decided to support deceptive anti-abortion pregnancy centers.
The SC ruling that should never have been means Californians can say bye-bye to the state law. State's rights to protect citizens from deception? Nope, state's rights are for when you want to support conservative ideas.
https://www.npr.org/2018/06/26/6064...th-california-anti-abortion-pregnancy-centersThe FACT Act requires unlicensed crisis pregnancy centers to post a sign or otherwise disclose to their clients in writing that the center is not a licensed medical facility and has no licensed medical provider who supervises the provision of services. The disclosure requirement extends to advertising, which anti-abortion pregnancy centers objected to as an attempt to "drown out" their message.
The second provision of the law, dealing with licensed centers, requires clinics that do not provide a full range of reproductive care, including services covered by Medicaid, to post a sign that says the state provides free or low-cost access to prenatal care, birth control and other reproductive care, including abortions.
In recent years, the number of pregnancy centers that counsel against abortion has dramatically increased. There are about 2,700 of them across the country, more than three times the number of clinics that provide abortions.
And just as some states provide taxpayer funds for abortions, 14 states directly fund anti-abortion pregnancy centers. From 2001 to 2006, the centers received an estimated $30 million in federal funding.
There is no data on how many of the 2,700 anti-abortion pregnancy centers are unlicensed. But unlicensed clinics offer pregnancy tests and limited ultrasounds, and, to an unskeptical eye, they can look very much like a licensed medical facility.
The personnel wear surgical scrubs or white coats and ask clients to fill out medical history questionnaires. Indeed, many clinics locate next to or across the street from a full-service women's reproductive health center and some use similar-sounding names.
The SC ruling that should never have been means Californians can say bye-bye to the state law. State's rights to protect citizens from deception? Nope, state's rights are for when you want to support conservative ideas.