The SSID had "guest" in it--I would presume that means it's set up by someone who knows to keep it isolated from the real network. I've seen such SSID/password combinations written on public-facing signs many times. Their presence here doesn't prove anything--most likely that it's a reference to be provided to those who ask. If they were actually being stupid the SSID wouldn't have "guest" in it.Well, I doubt now that people are attacking the networks, now that someone tweeted the idea to try, that they'll be kept out for long.
They had top secret classified documents in an unlocked room that literally anyone with the money to stay there could walk into any time, after which they secured it with a lock that could be popped practically by looking at it.
And you think they secured or structured their network properly. (Actually, I don't expect you think that.)
There's no reason to make a secure password in such a situation. I have encountered some and it's annoying--secure passwords are a pain to type on phones.The chosen password speaks to the quality of controls segmenting the internal and external networks... I am positive that a lateral attack would be possible
WTF?!?You read that title correctly. Supposedly someone taking medication to protect their own personal health is a violation of someone else’s religious freedom. And make no mistake: this affects way more than LGBTQIA+. It is a public health issue that impacts ALL of us.
Some hosebag attorney named Jonathan Mitchell filed a case in Texas arguing that his plaintiffs who pay into a health insurance policy that covers PrEP violates their religious beliefs based on the fact that it “enables and encourages homosexual behavior” and apparently they aren’t having it. Never mind the fact that PrEP saves lives and there really are heterosexual folks that take it as well. Apparently PrEP is a slippery slope that will lead to gay sex in the streets while reading banned books to 3rd graders in the wrong bathrooms….or something.
The 42 page ruling by United States district judge Reed O’Conner states “The PrEP mandate violates Braidwood’s rights under [Religious Freedom Restoration Act].”
This douche bubble of a justice (a mockery of the term) is not new to this ridiculous sort of behavior according to The Advocate who writes:
O'Connor's ruling is not surprising to seasoned observers.
A coalition of conservative groups sued the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to allow them to discriminate based on religious grounds, and O’Connor ruled in 2021 that they could proceed. This was despite the Supreme Court extending employment protections for LGBTQ+ people a year earlier. In addition, O’Connor struck down Obama-era health insurance protections for LGBTQ+ people and ruled the Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional (the Supreme Court later reversed O’Connor’s rulings).
Can we deny coverage for Covid because it encourages people to go to church? (Not as afraid of being in crowds.)WTF?!?
Just curious, but why did he get banned from twitter? (I'm also not going to bother watching the video.)How the fuck do people think this condescending prick is an "intellectual"? How can Peterson be so patronising and not get repeated punched in the face?
Full disclosure; I only skimmed the video, I don't hate myself so much as to force myself to endure it in its entirety.
Repeatedly deadnaming Elliot Page, then stating gender reaffirming surgeons are no better than nazis. Typical Daily Wire provocative shit basically. He wasn't banned per se, Twitter asked him to delete the offending tweets. Peterson took the...unconventional approach of saying he would rather die than delete those tweets (direct quote). As a result, he is now the new hero of the victimised right.Just curious, but why did he get banned from twitter? (I'm also not going to bother watching the video.)How the fuck do people think this condescending prick is an "intellectual"? How can Peterson be so patronising and not get repeated punched in the face?
Full disclosure; I only skimmed the video, I don't hate myself so much as to force myself to endure it in its entirety.
I absolutely love, btw, how they handled Elliot's transition on the Umbrella Academy. They just carried it through to the show, and then mostly ignored that it happened at all!Repeatedly deadnaming Elliot Page, then stating gender reaffirming surgeons are no better than nazis. Typical Daily Wire provocative shit basically. He wasn't banned per se, Twitter asked him to delete the offending tweets. Peterson took the...unconventional approach of saying he would rather die than delete those tweets (direct quote). As a result, he is now the new hero of the victimised right.Just curious, but why did he get banned from twitter? (I'm also not going to bother watching the video.)How the fuck do people think this condescending prick is an "intellectual"? How can Peterson be so patronising and not get repeated punched in the face?
Full disclosure; I only skimmed the video, I don't hate myself so much as to force myself to endure it in its entirety.
WTF is the Umbrella Academy???
And then fucks like this dick-son fuck see it and get so mad that they stick a pole in their spokes and blame everyone but themselves for it
It's a piece of media prominently featuring Elliot Paige.WTF is the Umbrella Academy???
Short version: very twisted X-Men. It's great.WTF is the Umbrella Academy???
Yeah, I looked it up. I don't get Netflix.Short version: very twisted X-Men. It's great.WTF is the Umbrella Academy???
Yeah, I looked it up. I don't get Netflix.Short version: very twisted X-Men. It's great.WTF is the Umbrella Academy???
Not worth it for this show*. And I consider Page's sex change between seasons to be more of a nuisance that they just had to write in, like a main character's actress becoming pregnant in reality forces tv shows to make the character pregnant too for a while.Yeah, I looked it up. I don't get Netflix.Short version: very twisted X-Men. It's great.WTF is the Umbrella Academy????