• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

India-Pakistan three-day war

Seems like Indians had a well-defined objective, terror and Indus water treaty. I think there will be changes when India returns to Indus water treaty. We too need water. 35% to India and 65% to Pakistan does not seem fair to us. Destroying Pakistani nukes was not the objective.
 
Royal United Services Institute

“Historic Kill”: S-400 Shot Down Pakistan’s AWACS Aircraft 314 KM Away During Indo-Pak War

IAF missiles shot down JF-17 Thunder, AWACS flying 300 km inside Pakistan, two F-16s, and a C-130J during Operation Sindoor

Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

IAF destroyed Pak's JF-17, 2 F-16s, AWACS, C-130J and HQ-9; Navy was about to hit Karachi port

 
Last edited:
Indian Hindu nationalists and Pakistani Muslim nationalists make our conservative Christian hawks look rational in comparison.

Neither India nor Pakistan have a real threat of invasion. The greeter military Cthreat to India is China. Nester side is an existential threat to the other.

1. The Conflict:

India and Pakistan have a long history of conflict, mainly due to the Kashmir dispute.They have fought several wars, engaged in frequent skirmishes, and tensions remain high.
Recent events, such as a deadly terror attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, have further increased tensions.

2. Nuclear Capabilities:
Both countries possess nuclear weapons, which act as a deterrent, though with differing doctrines.
India has a "no first use" (NFU) policy, meaning it would only retaliate with nuclear weapons if attacked first.
Pakistan, however, does not have an NFU policy and has stated it could use tactical nuclear weapons to counter threats, including conventional military attacks.
The potential for escalation to nuclear conflict is a significant concern, given their history and current tensions.

3. The Risk:
Despite the nuclear capabilities, most experts believe the risk of nuclear war between India and Pakistan is "relatively small".
The devastation of a nuclear exchange, even a limited one, serves as a powerful deterrent.
However, some analysts express concern that the current political climate and military escalations could increase the risk.

4. Expert Opinions:
Experts agree that the threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan is a serious concern.
They emphasize the importance of de-escalation and diplomatic efforts to prevent a catastrophic outcome.
The international community's role in mediating the conflict and promoting stability is also considered crucial.

5. Conclusion:
While a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan is not considered likely, the potential consequences are so severe that it remains a major concern.
Focusing on de-escalation, diplomacy, and international cooperation to mitigate the risks is essential.

Disclaimer: This information is based on publicly available sources and expert analysis. The situation is dynamic, and future developments could alter the assessed risk.
 
Neither India nor Pakistan have a real threat of invasion. The greeter military threat to India is China. Nester side is an existential threat to the other.

1. The Conflict:

India and Pakistan have a long history of conflict, mainly due to the Kashmir dispute.

2. Nuclear Capabilities:
Both countries possess nuclear weapons, which act as a deterrent, though with differing doctrines.
India has a "no first use" (NFU) policy, meaning it would only retaliate with nuclear weapons if attacked first.
Pakistan, however, does not have an NFU policy and has stated it could use tactical nuclear weapons to counter threats, including conventional military attacks.
The potential for escalation to nuclear conflict is a significant concern, given their history and current tensions.

3. The Risk:
Despite the nuclear capabilities, most experts believe the risk of nuclear war between India and Pakistan is "relatively small".
The devastation of a nuclear exchange, even a limited one, serves as a powerful deterrent.
However, some analysts express concern that the current political climate and military escalations could increase the risk.

4. Expert Opinions:
Experts agree that the threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan is a serious concern.
They emphasize the importance of de-escalation and diplomatic efforts to prevent a catastrophic outcome.
The international community's role in mediating the conflict and promoting stability is also considered crucial.

5. Conclusion:
While a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan is not considered likely, the potential consequences are so severe that it remains a major concern.
Focusing on de-escalation, diplomacy, and international cooperation to mitigate the risks is essential.

Disclaimer: This information is based on publicly available sources and expert analysis. The situation is dynamic, and future developments could alter the assessed risk.
That is correct. Threat from China is greater, but we cannot overlook the threat of Pan-Islamism from Muslim clerics and fundamentalists.
India has the third largest Muslim population in the world, 200 million and some 14% of the total population. Education in Muslims is low as most of them study in Islamic schools (madarsas), where the emphasis is on study of Quran. Basically, you can term them as illiterate. It is in these schools (madarsas) that clerics indoctrinate students against India and Hinduism. They become tools of Pakistan-inspired subversion.

1. Kashmir terrorism is an example of it perpetrated by indoctrinated locals and similar people from Pakistan, including Pakistan army personnel. Kashmir has now had a fair election and those elected have formed the government. Kashmir is one of the prosperous Indian states, the people are with India, but that is an eye-sore for Pakistan. In contrast, the Pakistan-held Kashmir is poor, it never has had a fair election, and currently it shares the inflation that prevails in Pakistan. That is why terrorists are sent to Indian-held Kashmir. A lot of people in Pakistan-held Kashmir dream of joining Indian Kashmir to throw-off Punjabi domination.

2. There is practically no danger of nuclear war between India and Pakistan though experts may say so. As has been reported, both have somewhere around 170 bombs. A decimation of Pakistan would require much less number of bombs as compared to decimation of India. Indian population currently stands at 1,463 million, while that of Pakistan is 255 million, i.e., India is 5.73 times larger than Pakistan. We are better equipped even to ward off nuclear missiles. Kindly read my post above or the FirstPost article which I linked earlier. The missiles will not be able to reach us. Our air-defense has proved better than even Israel's "Iron Dome".
 
Last edited:
Missiles are phallic and orgasmic.

Sexually repressed Muslim and Hindu males waving their symbolic penis at each other.
 
Missiles are phallic and orgasmic.
It is not that only Indians and Pakistanis have it. Other countries too have it.

It seems that the Pakistani air-craft were not even allowed to take off. As soon as they did that, Indian air-defense system picked them and neutralized them with Brahmos, Akash, S-400 and other systems from a distance as far as 300 kms.. That is why Pakistanis perhaps did not even fly them. We really did not expect this kind of one-sided war. To engage in a naval or bogging land war did not prove necessary.
 
Last edited:

“Historic Kill”: S-400 Shot Down Pakistan’s AWACS Aircraft 314 KM Away During Indo-Pak War

IAF missiles shot down JF-17 Thunder, AWACS flying 300 km inside Pakistan, two F-16s, and a C-130J during Operation Sindoor
Seems like you're enjoying the war enough to bring up a "historic kill".

(Sorry, an historic).
 
Seems like you're enjoying the war enough to bring up a "historic kill".
(Sorry, an historic).
IMHO, 'a historic' is correct, though I did not make it so, 'EurAsian Times' did.
 
It seems that people cannot live in peace, pursue their own interests raise a family, play sport, study, have hobbies, or whatever....just live and let live.
 
It seems that people cannot live in peace, pursue their own interests raise a family, play sport, study, have hobbies, or whatever....just live and let live.
That is what we want, if Pakistan will allow us to do so; but it fingers us and gets bashed up, fifth time in 78 years, while it hovers around bankruptcy and lives on foreign aid. India is now the fourth largest economy and will overtake Germany in an year or two to become the third largest economy in the world.
 
Last edited:
If these were ignored, there would not have been a Pakistan, but Muslim League did not want it that way. They wanted to part.
Gandhi even offered to make Jinnah the Prime Minister.
 
So achieving peace may be nothing more than a pipe dream. We are to have war as long as humankind exists.
Till Pakistan is controlled by Military, it does not seem possible. Pakistan military has sucked Pakistan dry.
Otherwise, we could have helped them. Giving 20 billion USD is not a big problem for India. India is fourth in the world with USD 690 billion foreign exchange reserves.
We are fourth with every thing at the moment, economy, military or foreign exchange reserves. :D
 
Last edited:
It's not always one side that's at fault, often both sides, so has India been doing something to fuel the conflict? How is it to be resolved?
 
It's not always one side that's at fault, often both sides, so has India been doing something to fuel the conflict? How is it to be resolved?
All conflicts cannot be solved. What India has done is to give democracy and prosperity to Kashmir that is with us. Pakistan has not done that with its portion of Kashmir. That is the reason why POK people migrated to UK in large numbers. They did not have any future in Pakistan. Now the whole of Pakistan has no future and all people are desperate to move out of Pakistan some way or the other, the wealthy have already done that. The story in Gilgit Baltistan is even worse. People in Gilgit are Shias (70%) and are persecuted.

df1038_12c03e8159c94b379e4c2ab47b1842b5~mv2.png
800px-Sectarian_divide_of_Gilgit-Baltistan.png
Click to enlarge the image.
 
Last edited:
It's not always one side that's at fault, often both sides, so has India been doing something to fuel the conflict? How is it to be resolved?
More lines on a map. That always solves the problem!
 
Do you think training terrorists and sending them to kill unarmed Indians tourists of a particular religion in Kashmir is OK?
Indian Kashmir has a government elected fairly and democratically by its own people..
The attack severely damaged the tourist industry in Kashmir this year impacting the lives of hundreds of thousand of its people.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom