For those of you who think MAGA Trump supporters are in a cult

[Loren Pechtel]

Al Jazeera reported that one of The Felon's incompetent appointments said something. In this case, "accurate" but not remotely evidence that they spoke the truth.

Just to bring closure to this sub-subthread, let me summarize it:

• Al Jazeera reported, correctly, that Tulsi Gabbard made some claims.
• Al Jazeera reported, correctly, that Tulsi Gabbard's claims were probably false.
• The topic of this sub-subthread is: Is Al Jazeera's English-language website a reliable source (when they are NOT discussing Israel)?

It's hard to be sure but I think Loren is conceding that Al Jazeera is relatively reliable.

Got one right should be normal, it's not evidence of reliability.

 

[Swammerdami]

Just to bring closure to this sub-subthread, let me summarize it:

• Al Jazeera reported, correctly, that Tulsi Gabbard made some claims.
• Al Jazeera reported, correctly, that Tulsi Gabbard's claims were probably false.
• The topic of this sub-subthread is: Is Al Jazeera's English-language website a reliable source (when they are NOT discussing Israel)?

It's hard to be sure but I think Loren is conceding that Al Jazeera is relatively reliable.

Got one right should be normal, it's not evidence of reliability.

No. As already pointed out, the EVIDENCE is the researched opinion of Ad Fontes Media, whose business model is objective evaluation. It is NOT a left-wing mouth-piece: Fox News Live is shown with very high reliability. (Fox News Web is way behind Fox News Live but still ahead of the Rachel Maddow Show in reliability according to Ad Fontes Media.)

... you use RVonse's total misrepresentation to help confirm your bias against a website (as graded by  Ad Fontes Media) roughly as reliable as CNN: The Situation Room, slightly more reliable than Newsweek, and WAY ahead of CBS: 60 Minutes in reliability.

Ad Fontes Media, Inc. is a Colorado-based, media watchdog, public benefit corporation,[1] primarily known for its Media Bias Chart, which rates media sources in terms of political bias and reliability. The organization was founded in 2018 by patent attorney Vanessa Otero with the goal of combating political polarization and media bias. Ad Fontes Media uses a panel of analysts across the political spectrum to evaluate articles for the Chart.[2][3] The chart markets its analysis to advertisers looking for third-party rankings of news sources in assessing brand safety ...

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Just to bring closure to this sub-subthread, let me summarize it:

• Al Jazeera reported, correctly, that Tulsi Gabbard made some claims.
• Al Jazeera reported, correctly, that Tulsi Gabbard's claims were probably false.
• The topic of this sub-subthread is: Is Al Jazeera's English-language website a reliable source (when they are NOT discussing Israel)?

It's hard to be sure but I think Loren is conceding that Al Jazeera is relatively reliable.

Got one right should be normal, it's not evidence of reliability.

No. As already pointed out, the EVIDENCE is the researched opinion of Ad Fontes Media, whose business model is objective evaluation. It is NOT a left-wing mouth-piece: Fox News Live is shown with very high reliability. (Fox News Web is way behind Fox News Live but still ahead of the Rachel Maddow Show in reliability according to Ad Fontes Media.)

... you use RVonse's total misrepresentation to help confirm your bias against a website (as graded by  Ad Fontes Media) roughly as reliable as CNN: The Situation Room, slightly more reliable than Newsweek, and WAY ahead of CBS: 60 Minutes in reliability.

Ad Fontes Media, Inc. is a Colorado-based, media watchdog, public benefit corporation,[1] primarily known for its Media Bias Chart, which rates media sources in terms of political bias and reliability. The organization was founded in 2018 by patent attorney Vanessa Otero with the goal of combating political polarization and media bias. Ad Fontes Media uses a panel of analysts across the political spectrum to evaluate articles for the Chart.[2][3] The chart markets its analysis to advertisers looking for third-party rankings of news sources in assessing brand safety ...

Al Jazeera used to be good. Past tense.

 

[Gospel]

Opinions have only ever been just that, opinions. Present tense.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

As for firing of Dr. McEntarfer I think Trump was an absolute moron for doing this. If anything the problem has been early reporting being too optimistic before all the facts come in. Trump has just formally told the world that US government stats can not be trusted at all in the future. He has told the world that politics takes priority over telling the truth...not that I ever believed reports given from any administration anyway.

Are you getting a hint of why we object to The Felon?

And note that things are playing out pretty much as we expected. Doesn't that suggest that the rest of what we've predicted is also likely to be right?

But Trump (for all his many faults) has also proven the left were and are still horribly wrong. On the most important things that count:

Yes... for all of Trump's faults, he is right about everything!

 

[Patooka]

Holy fuck; I just realised how much the MAGA cult are silent about the Epstein Files are right now...

...must be a coincidence ...

 

[Patooka]

Nope. MAGA is just a bunch of cunts cult. Just figured it out. I'm smart like that.

 

[ZiprHead]

Not a cult.