Why do you think I'm making apologetics for her?You should at least try to make your apologetics consistent with hers.
She says the cop grabbed her boob.
Why do you think I'm making apologetics for her?You should at least try to make your apologetics consistent with hers.
She says the cop grabbed her boob.
The problem of course is that bruising doesn't prove it was inflicted by the cop (much less that he grabbed her boobs on purpose), especially since she spend the previous few days rallying where a lot of people were milling about in very close quarters.Photos show definite bruising on her chest area. She claims she was grabbed on her chest from behind. I don't know anyone who would not struggle in a situation where an unknown person grabs them from behind.
The problem of course is that bruising doesn't prove it was inflicted by the cop (much less that he grabbed her boobs on purpose), especially since she spend the previous few days rallying where a lot of people were milling about in very close quarters.Photos show definite bruising on her chest area. She claims she was grabbed on her chest from behind. I don't know anyone who would not struggle in a situation where an unknown person grabs them from behind.
This is your argument, after all you said in the Martin/Zimmerman threads? That was exactly your argument there.
I'm sure a woman doesn't have to be a rabid cop-hating activist to react with an elbow backwards if someone grabs her boobs from behind.
I think it would be hard to subdue a woman from behind without the woman typically having some sort of forceful action regardless what you touch. Men would probably be near equally alarmed (though possibly a little hopeful).I imagine it's difficult to subdue a writhing female protester without putting hands on the naughty bits.