• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The Buddha's Mistake

Ramaraksha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
667
Location
Chicago, IL
Basic Beliefs
Rational, Down-to-Earth
The Buddha went in search of finding a way out of pain and suffering. It is my belief that in his later years he realized his mistake
Pain & Suffering are part of life - Hinduism teaches us that if Joy & Happiness is one side of the coin, Pain & Suffering is the other

Heaven is but a metaphor for the womb, childhood
In the womb we were enveloped with love by our mother(God), food available at all times, warm, cozy - no worries or fears - it was wonderful!
But then suddenly we were thrown out into a cold, hard world!

Pain begins, but so does Life!

And that is the Truth we must realize - without pain there would be no life - or as i have posted in a previous thread - only life as a lower form - a tree, a bug, a blade of grass or a cat or a dog- will free us from pain. An after life heaven of pure joy and happiness is but a fantasy happily encouraged by religion knowing full well that their fantasy worlds cannot be verified. As they say it takes two hands to clap - people are too happy to drink the kool-aid of heaven - sadly even the best of minds it seems

But that is a mistake - it is a desire to go back to the womb, to childhood - but one can't run away from life and expect good things to happen. One has to grow up, become an Adult, face the world and pain & Suffering will be our constant companions in this journey
 
The Buddha taught that life was full of suffering, didn't he?
 
The Buddha taught that life was full of suffering, didn't he?
Not really. Dukkha isn’t restricted to “suffering”. Simply put, but just less so than the too-simple-to-be-true “life is suffering” misconception: Dukkha has to do with anicca which is impermanence. All things pass, both happiness and suffering. To cling to one or the other with greed or aversion leaves you in a perpetual state of dissatisfaction or frustration. The Buddha offered a solution to that: don't cling.
 
Being strongly attached forms an associated fear of loss, and inevitable suffering when the object of one's attachment is lost.
 
The Buddha went in search of finding a way out of pain and suffering. It is my belief that in his later years he realized his mistake.

.... snip....
That is your mistake. That's not what Buddhism is about.

The Buddha found the way out of pain and suffering. He became enlightened thus breaking the cycle of death and rebirth. The idea of reincarnation being a good thing is a western misinterpretation of Hindu and Buddhist teachings. By their teachings we are cursed to be continually reborn in different forms and to endure the suffering of a physical existence until we attain enlightenment.
 
Last edited:
The Buddha taught that life was full of suffering, didn't he?
Not really. Dukkha isn’t restricted to “suffering”. Simply put, but just less so than the too-simple-to-be-true “life is suffering” misconception: Dukkha has to do with anicca which is impermanence. All things pass, both happiness and suffering. To cling to one or the other with greed or aversion leaves you in a perpetual state of dissatisfaction or frustration. The Buddha offered a solution to that: don't cling.
Exactly, life is impermanent, and this applies much more than just relations as we ourselves are ever changing (which is why materialism always fails to make people happy). Accept it or suffer... or as Guantama said, "Cut the fucking cord already!"
 
'Dukkha' means 'unsatisfying'. The First Noble Truth is "The Truth of Dukkha is that all conditional phenomena and experiences are not ultimately satisfying". the second is: "The Truth of the Origin of Dukkha is that craving for and clinging to what is pleasurable and aversion to what is not pleasurable result in becoming, rebirth, dissatisfaction, and redeath". It really has nothing to do with what you're talking about - we don't expect that following the path with make you immune to pain, sickness, age and death, only that you will be happy despite it.
 
The Buddha went in search of finding a way out of pain and suffering. It is my belief that in his later years he realized his mistake.

.... snip....
That is your mistake. That's not what Buddhism is about.

The Buddha found the way out of pain and suffering. He became enlightened thus breaking the cycle of death and rebirth. The idea of reincarnation being a good thing is a western misinterpretation of Hindu and Buddhist teachings. By their teachings we are cursed to be continually reborn in different forms and to endure the suffering of a physical existence until we attain enlightenment.

It is sort of like dropping out of school - no more bad teachers, no more studies, no more homework - just sit back and enjoy! Is it such a good thing? The problem with life is that it comes with pain and suffering - as i posted in my opening thread - life begins with pain. If you don't want pain, then you can't have life either. Death will free you from pain and suffering - you choose to not exist - it is that simple

"The idea of reincarnation being a good thing is a western misinterpretation of Hindu and Buddhist teachings" er what? When did the west ever praise anything from another religion?

If you don't want to be reborn, God will not stop you but to think you will get to go to some magic land in the sky and take it easy is a myth. Just like choosing to drop out of school - don't expect your parents and those who know you to congratulate you nor expect a medal when you drop ou
 
'Dukkha' means 'unsatisfying'. The First Noble Truth is "The Truth of Dukkha is that all conditional phenomena and experiences are not ultimately satisfying". the second is: "The Truth of the Origin of Dukkha is that craving for and clinging to what is pleasurable and aversion to what is not pleasurable result in becoming, rebirth, dissatisfaction, and redeath". It really has nothing to do with what you're talking about - we don't expect that following the path with make you immune to pain, sickness, age and death, only that you will be happy despite it.

Pain is part of you - when you see a women being harassed by some guys, you can drop your head, look away and go on your way OR you can feel her pain and try to help and maybe get beaten up by those goons

The problem has been that life comes with pain - life is harsh and the Buddha hoped to find a way out, but it is a failed quest - there is no such thing. That is why many of the people who followed the Buddha became wanderers - not participating in life - that's one way of reducing pain - running away from life
 
Not really. Dukkha isn’t restricted to “suffering”. Simply put, but just less so than the too-simple-to-be-true “life is suffering” misconception: Dukkha has to do with anicca which is impermanence. All things pass, both happiness and suffering. To cling to one or the other with greed or aversion leaves you in a perpetual state of dissatisfaction or frustration. The Buddha offered a solution to that: don't cling.
Exactly, life is impermanent, and this applies much more than just relations as we ourselves are ever changing (which is why materialism always fails to make people happy). Accept it or suffer... or as Guantama said, "Cut the fucking cord already!"

This isn't rocket science - say there are 2 kids in school - one wants top grades, the other couldn't care less whether he passed or failed. One stays up late, studying, worrying, the other one snoring away happily. Which one is happier? The latter obviously. Is that you? Any time you lower your dreams, goals, you are "happier"?

Where would you find the coward? underneath the bed, safe, happy. Where would you find the warrior? In the middle of battle, bleeding to death, in pain. Which one are you?
 
Being strongly attached forms an associated fear of loss, and inevitable suffering when the object of one's attachment is lost.

It also means we are human - to care for something is normal, natural. You have a body made of flesh and bone - you feel pain and pleasure thru it. One day you could go on a rocket ship, be hit by some strange stuff and wake with a body covered in rock - now nothing can harm you, but there is a downside isn't there? Now you can't even hug anyone. Be careful what you wish for
 
The Buddha taught that life was full of suffering, didn't he?
Not really. Dukkha isn’t restricted to “suffering”. Simply put, but just less so than the too-simple-to-be-true “life is suffering” misconception: Dukkha has to do with anicca which is impermanence. All things pass, both happiness and suffering. To cling to one or the other with greed or aversion leaves you in a perpetual state of dissatisfaction or frustration. The Buddha offered a solution to that: don't cling.

It also means you check out of life - life without dreams, aspirations - what is it good for? Dreams, aspirations come with pain, suffering

To think after this life one get to go away to some magic land where one will get to sit on our collective butts and spend the rest of eternity in a cartoon land of happiness is a myth, just a fantasy
 
That is your mistake. That's not what Buddhism is about.

The Buddha found the way out of pain and suffering. He became enlightened thus breaking the cycle of death and rebirth. The idea of reincarnation being a good thing is a western misinterpretation of Hindu and Buddhist teachings. By their teachings we are cursed to be continually reborn in different forms and to endure the suffering of a physical existence until we attain enlightenment.

It is sort of like dropping out of school - no more bad teachers, no more studies, no more homework - just sit back and enjoy! Is it such a good thing? The problem with life is that it comes with pain and suffering - as i posted in my opening thread - life begins with pain. If you don't want pain, then you can't have life either. Death will free you from pain and suffering - you choose to not exist - it is that simple
You are the one that brought up the Buddha. I just corrected your misunderstanding of what he "found". Buddhism and Hinduism both teach that life is pain and suffering but death does not free one because we can not break the cycle of death and rebirth (it is our curse) until enlightenment is attained.
"The idea of reincarnation being a good thing is a western misinterpretation of Hindu and Buddhist teachings" er what? When did the west ever praise anything from another religion?
WTF??. Did you somehow miss the whole new age movement?
If you don't want to be reborn, God will not stop you but to think you will get to go to some magic land in the sky and take it easy is a myth. Just like choosing to drop out of school - don't expect your parents and those who know you to congratulate you nor expect a medal when you drop ou
Again, WTF?

You should have guessed that, since you are on a freethought board, that you are addressing predominately atheists. So the prevailing idea is that death is final. That there is no afterlife, rebirth or even awareness after death. Death isn't a choice but the natural and necessary end of life... a final step into oblivion.
 
It is sort of like dropping out of school - no more bad teachers, no more studies, no more homework - just sit back and enjoy! Is it such a good thing? The problem with life is that it comes with pain and suffering - as i posted in my opening thread - life begins with pain. If you don't want pain, then you can't have life either. Death will free you from pain and suffering - you choose to not exist - it is that simple
You are the one that brought up the Buddha. I just corrected your misunderstanding of what he "found". Buddhism and Hinduism both teach that life is pain and suffering but death does not free one because we can not break the cycle of death and rebirth (it is our curse) until enlightenment is attained.
"The idea of reincarnation being a good thing is a western misinterpretation of Hindu and Buddhist teachings" er what? When did the west ever praise anything from another religion?
WTF??. Did you somehow miss the whole new age movement?
If you don't want to be reborn, God will not stop you but to think you will get to go to some magic land in the sky and take it easy is a myth. Just like choosing to drop out of school - don't expect your parents and those who know you to congratulate you nor expect a medal when you drop ou
Again, WTF?

You should have guessed that, since you are on a freethought board, that you are addressing predominately atheists. So the prevailing idea is that death is final. That there is no afterlife, rebirth or even awareness after death. Death isn't a choice but the natural and necessary end of life... a final step into oblivion.

er first of all whether something is good or not the benefit should be given to the ones who originated it, correct? People change over time, the original idea of Hindus about Reincarnation was about choosing life over some magic land in the sky(we are talking religion here, so let's not mix it up with Atheism) and Hindus by coming up with the idea of Reincarnation were asking the followers to choose Life. Unfortunately as time passed and life became harder and harder, weakness took over and people thought gaining enlightenment meant a release from pain and suffering and that is what the Buddha taught, but the Buddha did not mean that one will get to go away to magic lands, all he said was that we would be able to handle pain and suffering better. His original intention was to end pain and suffering and by the end i think he realized his folly and ended up teaching us how to handle the stress and some people still think it is a way out of pain and suffering

Fact is that Hinduism was trying to teach us that Life is a Gift, but the problem with life is that it is hard, difficult, there is no free lunch and as man became weaker, life became a sin, a curse as you put it, and the unending quest to find a way out, which gave religions the opening to promise Sugar Daddy Gods and the easy after life. And so Hinduism once again responded with the teaching of Reincarnation - find Strength, stop running away, see the Gift of Life

Lastly, i do understand that this is an Atheist board but we are discussing religious ideas - what they really mean and hope for. The elephant in the room exists and we need to discuss it
 
You are the one that brought up the Buddha. I just corrected your misunderstanding of what he "found". Buddhism and Hinduism both teach that life is pain and suffering but death does not free one because we can not break the cycle of death and rebirth (it is our curse) until enlightenment is attained.
"The idea of reincarnation being a good thing is a western misinterpretation of Hindu and Buddhist teachings" er what? When did the west ever praise anything from another religion?
WTF??. Did you somehow miss the whole new age movement?
If you don't want to be reborn, God will not stop you but to think you will get to go to some magic land in the sky and take it easy is a myth. Just like choosing to drop out of school - don't expect your parents and those who know you to congratulate you nor expect a medal when you drop ou
Again, WTF?

You should have guessed that, since you are on a freethought board, that you are addressing predominately atheists. So the prevailing idea is that death is final. That there is no afterlife, rebirth or even awareness after death. Death isn't a choice but the natural and necessary end of life... a final step into oblivion.

er first of all whether something is good or not the benefit should be given to the ones who originated it, correct? People change over time, the original idea of Hindus about Reincarnation was about choosing life over some magic land in the sky(we are talking religion here, so let's not mix it up with Atheism) and Hindus by coming up with the idea of Reincarnation were asking the followers to choose Life. Unfortunately as time passed and life became harder and harder, weakness took over and people thought gaining enlightenment meant a release from pain and suffering and that is what the Buddha taught, but the Buddha did not mean that one will get to go away to magic lands, all he said was that we would be able to handle pain and suffering better. His original intention was to end pain and suffering and by the end i think he realized his folly and ended up teaching us how to handle the stress and some people still think it is a way out of pain and suffering

Fact is that Hinduism was trying to teach us that Life is a Gift, but the problem with life is that it is hard, difficult, there is no free lunch and as man became weaker, life became a sin, a curse as you put it, and the unending quest to find a way out, which gave religions the opening to promise Sugar Daddy Gods and the easy after life. And so Hinduism once again responded with the teaching of Reincarnation - find Strength, stop running away, see the Gift of Life

Lastly, i do understand that this is an Atheist board but we are discussing religious ideas - what they really mean and hope for. The elephant in the room exists and we need to discuss it
Yes. That is what I was trying to correct about your idea of Buddhism. The goal of Buddhism is to break the cycle of death and rebirth by attaining Nirvana. The path that the Buddha prescribed to reach Nirvana is to let go of our desires, cravings and attachments and to try to eliminate our ignorance.

Your idea of attachment to life through choosing your next incarnation I don't understand. Are you claiming that this is reality or are you saying that you think it would really be neat as hell and wish it were reality?
 
You are the one that brought up the Buddha. I just corrected your misunderstanding of what he "found". Buddhism and Hinduism both teach that life is pain and suffering but death does not free one because we can not break the cycle of death and rebirth (it is our curse) until enlightenment is attained.
"The idea of reincarnation being a good thing is a western misinterpretation of Hindu and Buddhist teachings" er what? When did the west ever praise anything from another religion?
WTF??. Did you somehow miss the whole new age movement?
If you don't want to be reborn, God will not stop you but to think you will get to go to some magic land in the sky and take it easy is a myth. Just like choosing to drop out of school - don't expect your parents and those who know you to congratulate you nor expect a medal when you drop ou
Again, WTF?

You should have guessed that, since you are on a freethought board, that you are addressing predominately atheists. So the prevailing idea is that death is final. That there is no afterlife, rebirth or even awareness after death. Death isn't a choice but the natural and necessary end of life... a final step into oblivion.

er first of all whether something is good or not the benefit should be given to the ones who originated it, correct? People change over time, the original idea of Hindus about Reincarnation was about choosing life over some magic land in the sky(we are talking religion here, so let's not mix it up with Atheism) and Hindus by coming up with the idea of Reincarnation were asking the followers to choose Life. Unfortunately as time passed and life became harder and harder, weakness took over and people thought gaining enlightenment meant a release from pain and suffering and that is what the Buddha taught, but the Buddha did not mean that one will get to go away to magic lands, all he said was that we would be able to handle pain and suffering better. His original intention was to end pain and suffering and by the end i think he realized his folly and ended up teaching us how to handle the stress and some people still think it is a way out of pain and suffering

Fact is that Hinduism was trying to teach us that Life is a Gift, but the problem with life is that it is hard, difficult, there is no free lunch and as man became weaker, life became a sin, a curse as you put it, and the unending quest to find a way out, which gave religions the opening to promise Sugar Daddy Gods and the easy after life. And so Hinduism once again responded with the teaching of Reincarnation - find Strength, stop running away, see the Gift of Life

Lastly, i do understand that this is an Atheist board but we are discussing religious ideas - what they really mean and hope for. The elephant in the room exists and we need to discuss it
Yes. That is what I was trying to correct about your idea of Buddhism. The goal of Buddhism is to break the cycle of death and rebirth by attaining Nirvana. The path that the Buddha prescribed to reach Nirvana is to let go of our desires, cravings and attachments and to try to eliminate our ignorance.

Your idea of attachment to life through choosing your next incarnation I don't understand. Are you claiming that this is reality or are you saying that you think it would really be neat as hell and wish it were reality?

I am looking for a logical down to earth explanation for all these ideas - to me the harshness of life gave rise to life being a sin and the concept of Sugar Daddy Gods who run comfort Heavens. The original idea of Reincarnation, which the Buddha misunderstood or maybe he did, i am not too sure on this point, is to realize we can't run away from the harshness of life, that pain is a part of it, problems need to be faced and dealt with. Unfortunately later Hindus thought that Reincarnation was some sort of harsh rule and looked for ways to break the cycle and my hope in life is to teach that that is the wrong view.
I do also believe that your view of what the Buddha prescribed is also wrong - letting go of desires, cravings and attachments, yes, will get one away from pain and suffering - as i have wrote, it is the kid who aspires for high grades will be the one in pain, staying up late, studying whereas the kid who doesn't care will be snoring away. It is the warrior who will be in pain, bleeding to death while the coward hiding under the bed is safe and happy
The path to Nirvana is thru pain and suffering - Buddhism has something like that - these people are called Bodhisattva's
The Buddha's true teaching, which he learnt from the Gita, was about Control - control one's desires, aspirations and attachments - and that's all his teachings are about - learn to deal with pain as well as joy the same way, no huge ups or downs
So uptil here i am down to earth, and here's where i get a bit transcendental -i believe that we are born as humans because we wished for it and now that we have had a taste of it and if dislike it, then we can choose not to be reborn. Those who aspire for heaven - an easy life without problems - can choose to be reborn as a tree, a tiny bug, a blade of grass or even as a dog or cat - all life forms where life is easy and worry-free(well, there are problems for these life forms, but fortunately they lack the brain to worry about them). The guy who wishes for 72 virgins? Well, he is after sex, so he can be reborn as a bonobo monkey or a chimp or a bird - all life forms who have a lot of sex - he gets his wish
Look up - Tat Tvam Asi - 3 famous Hindu words & the above will make sense
 
You are the one that brought up the Buddha. I just corrected your misunderstanding of what he "found". Buddhism and Hinduism both teach that life is pain and suffering but death does not free one because we can not break the cycle of death and rebirth (it is our curse) until enlightenment is attained.
"The idea of reincarnation being a good thing is a western misinterpretation of Hindu and Buddhist teachings" er what? When did the west ever praise anything from another religion?
WTF??. Did you somehow miss the whole new age movement?
If you don't want to be reborn, God will not stop you but to think you will get to go to some magic land in the sky and take it easy is a myth. Just like choosing to drop out of school - don't expect your parents and those who know you to congratulate you nor expect a medal when you drop ou
Again, WTF?

You should have guessed that, since you are on a freethought board, that you are addressing predominately atheists. So the prevailing idea is that death is final. That there is no afterlife, rebirth or even awareness after death. Death isn't a choice but the natural and necessary end of life... a final step into oblivion.

er first of all whether something is good or not the benefit should be given to the ones who originated it, correct? People change over time, the original idea of Hindus about Reincarnation was about choosing life over some magic land in the sky(we are talking religion here, so let's not mix it up with Atheism) and Hindus by coming up with the idea of Reincarnation were asking the followers to choose Life. Unfortunately as time passed and life became harder and harder, weakness took over and people thought gaining enlightenment meant a release from pain and suffering and that is what the Buddha taught, but the Buddha did not mean that one will get to go away to magic lands, all he said was that we would be able to handle pain and suffering better. His original intention was to end pain and suffering and by the end i think he realized his folly and ended up teaching us how to handle the stress and some people still think it is a way out of pain and suffering

Fact is that Hinduism was trying to teach us that Life is a Gift, but the problem with life is that it is hard, difficult, there is no free lunch and as man became weaker, life became a sin, a curse as you put it, and the unending quest to find a way out, which gave religions the opening to promise Sugar Daddy Gods and the easy after life. And so Hinduism once again responded with the teaching of Reincarnation - find Strength, stop running away, see the Gift of Life

Lastly, i do understand that this is an Atheist board but we are discussing religious ideas - what they really mean and hope for. The elephant in the room exists and we need to discuss it
Yes. That is what I was trying to correct about your idea of Buddhism. The goal of Buddhism is to break the cycle of death and rebirth by attaining Nirvana. The path that the Buddha prescribed to reach Nirvana is to let go of our desires, cravings and attachments and to try to eliminate our ignorance.

Your idea of attachment to life through choosing your next incarnation I don't understand. Are you claiming that this is reality or are you saying that you think it would really be neat as hell and wish it were reality?

I am looking for a logical down to earth explanation for all these ideas - to me the harshness of life gave rise to life being a sin and the concept of Sugar Daddy Gods who run comfort Heavens. The original idea of Reincarnation, which the Buddha misunderstood or maybe he did, i am not too sure on this point, is to realize we can't run away from the harshness of life, that pain is a part of it, problems need to be faced and dealt with. Unfortunately later Hindus thought that Reincarnation was some sort of harsh rule and looked for ways to break the cycle and my hope in life is to teach that that is the wrong view.
I do also believe that your view of what the Buddha prescribed is also wrong - letting go of desires, cravings and attachments, yes, will get one away from pain and suffering - as i have wrote, it is the kid who aspires for high grades will be the one in pain, staying up late, studying whereas the kid who doesn't care will be snoring away. It is the warrior who will be in pain, bleeding to death while the coward hiding under the bed is safe and happy
The path to Nirvana is thru pain and suffering - Buddhism has something like that - these people are called Bodhisattva's
The Buddha's true teaching, which he learnt from the Gita, was about Control - control one's desires, aspirations and attachments - and that's all his teachings are about - learn to deal with pain as well as joy the same way, no huge ups or downs
So uptil here i am down to earth, and here's where i get a bit transcendental -i believe that we are born as humans because we wished for it and now that we have had a taste of it and if dislike it, then we can choose not to be reborn. Those who aspire for heaven - an easy life without problems - can choose to be reborn as a tree, a tiny bug, a blade of grass or even as a dog or cat - all life forms where life is easy and worry-free(well, there are problems for these life forms, but fortunately they lack the brain to worry about them). The guy who wishes for 72 virgins? Well, he is after sex, so he can be reborn as a bonobo monkey or a chimp or a bird - all life forms who have a lot of sex - he gets his wish
Look up - Tat Tvam Asi - 3 famous Hindu words & the above will make sense
So in answer to my question, you think it is reality. Now another question. Is there any reason that you believe that is reality or is it like most religions where you think of or hear something that just sounds neat to you so you accept it as truth? In other words, can you actually defend the claims or just assert them to be true with no basis but hope and faith?
 
Being strongly attached forms an associated fear of loss, and inevitable suffering when the object of one's attachment is lost.

It also means we are human - to care for something is normal, natural. You have a body made of flesh and bone - you feel pain and pleasure thru it. One day you could go on a rocket ship, be hit by some strange stuff and wake with a body covered in rock - now nothing can harm you, but there is a downside isn't there? Now you can't even hug anyone. Be careful what you wish for

Isn't it the point of Buddhist meditation and understanding of desire and suffering to transcend attachment to the things of the world and achieve enlightenment?

''The Buddhist teachings say that the more people free themselves from desire, ill will and ignorance, the greater their happiness is — no matter what is going on around them. When they have completely removed desire, ill will and ignorance the Buddha says they will experience the same supreme happiness he discovered.''
 
Pain is part of you
This is exactly what Buddha claims to be verifiably false. The delusion that your emotions, feelings, thoughts are somehow parts of you, not merely incorporated in "you" by force of habit is a major part of what Buddhists call "ignorance" leading to dukkha. You can verify this, in a very small way, for yourself: it's an amplified version of the difference between being angry vs. being angry and also being aware of this fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom