• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The Battle Over CRISPR Could Make Or Break Some Biotech Companies

ksen

Contributor
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
6,540
Location
Florida
Basic Beliefs
Calvinist
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...r-could-make-or-break-some-biotech-companies/

When is $100 million not $100 million? When it’s a proxy, maybe even something akin to a bet.

The nice, round figure is the target initial public offering value for Editas Medicine, a biotechnology firm with a mission of using gene editing to treat disease. The company has already raised more than $160 million from investors, and initial evaluations of the IPO said it was almost certain to be exceeded when the stock started trading publicly.

But Editas could face a big problem. The company has hitched its fortunes to CRISPR,1 a revolutionary gene-editing technology embroiled in concerns over ethics and, most immediately, a patent dispute. Editas licensed the technology in 2014 from the patent holder, scientists from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, as part of its research into genomic medicine, including cancer immunotherapies. But earlier this month, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office accepted a challenge to the Broad Institute group’s patent from the University of California, which is backing a rival group of scientists. Without licensing from the eventual winner of the patent fight, Editas and other companies investing in commercial CRISPR research could be blocked from marketing products based on the intellectual property in question, putting at risk hundreds of millions of dollars in investment.

So the real tragedy in this CRISPR fight is millionaires and billionaires maybe losing lots of money and not the delay in therapies this fight will cause?

Seems kind of backwards to me.
 
It almost sounds like a bubble. People jumping on the bandwagon hoping for potential profit before the intellectual property problems are ironed out. I've been finding increasingly good articles at 538. Good eye.
 
So the real tragedy in this CRISPR fight is millionaires and billionaires maybe losing lots of money and not the delay in therapies this fight will cause?

Seems kind of backwards to me.

Same thing I was thinking as I was reading it. Great minds think! :D
 
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...r-could-make-or-break-some-biotech-companies/

When is $100 million not $100 million? When it’s a proxy, maybe even something akin to a bet.

The nice, round figure is the target initial public offering value for Editas Medicine, a biotechnology firm with a mission of using gene editing to treat disease. The company has already raised more than $160 million from investors, and initial evaluations of the IPO said it was almost certain to be exceeded when the stock started trading publicly.

But Editas could face a big problem. The company has hitched its fortunes to CRISPR,1 a revolutionary gene-editing technology embroiled in concerns over ethics and, most immediately, a patent dispute. Editas licensed the technology in 2014 from the patent holder, scientists from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, as part of its research into genomic medicine, including cancer immunotherapies. But earlier this month, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office accepted a challenge to the Broad Institute group’s patent from the University of California, which is backing a rival group of scientists. Without licensing from the eventual winner of the patent fight, Editas and other companies investing in commercial CRISPR research could be blocked from marketing products based on the intellectual property in question, putting at risk hundreds of millions of dollars in investment.

So the real tragedy in this CRISPR fight is millionaires and billionaires maybe losing lots of money and not the delay in therapies this fight will cause?

Seems kind of backwards to me.

The two are connected. The charity non-profit organizations are failing to invest the hundreds of millions required into this research, so only the for profit investors remain, but they are hesitant to put in too much without the IP situation being resolved due to the increased odds of loss of capital as a result of the uncertainty.
 
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...r-could-make-or-break-some-biotech-companies/



So the real tragedy in this CRISPR fight is millionaires and billionaires maybe losing lots of money and not the delay in therapies this fight will cause?

Seems kind of backwards to me.

The two are connected.

You'd never know they were connected from reading this article which is purely about the risk of investor losses.

The charity non-profit organizations are failing to invest the hundreds of millions required into this research,

You think the hundreds of millions is going towards research? Given the pharmaceutical industry's ever shrinking research budgets I doubt it.

so only the for profit investors remain, but they are hesitant to put in too much without the IP situation being resolved due to the increased odds of loss of capital as a result of the uncertainty.

Actually, they haven't been hesitant at all . . . hence this article worrying about investment loss rather than therapy loss.
 
Back
Top Bottom