• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Julian vs. Hillary

Derec

Contributor
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
25,446
Location
Atlanta, GA
Basic Beliefs
atheist
Everything isn't about Clinton and loyalty to her.

Was the US seriously in danger from her entitled thinking to private emails? If so, she should get in trouble, if it was also illegal.
 
Everything isn't about Clinton and loyalty to her.

Was the US seriously in danger from her entitled thinking to private emails? If so, she should get in trouble, if it was also illegal.

You don't think that that Julian leaking the Clinton e-mails now, just as there's a tiny lull of e-mail gate is a coincidence??! I guaranty you that anytime there is a lull, or when Trump is having a bad day, there will be another e-mail story. You'd better get used to it. And it won't stop until after she is elected.
 
Everything isn't about Clinton and loyalty to her.

Was the US seriously in danger from her entitled thinking to private emails? If so, she should get in trouble, if it was also illegal.

You don't think that that Julian leaking the Clinton e-mails now, just as there's a tiny lull of e-mail gate is a coincidence??! I guaranty you that anytime there is a lull, or when Trump is having a bad day, there will be another e-mail story. You'd better get used to it. And it won't stop until after she is elected.

So Assange is part of the great right wing conspiracy too? It seemed a tad delusional when you were ranting that the FBI and the State department and intelligence inspectors general were in on it, but Assange is in on it too?

That's one helluva vast conspiracy.

Why do you imagine they'll stop when she's elected? Or are you in on it too?
 
You don't think that that Julian leaking the Clinton e-mails now, just as there's a tiny lull of e-mail gate is a coincidence??! I guaranty you that anytime there is a lull, or when Trump is having a bad day, there will be another e-mail story. You'd better get used to it. And it won't stop until after she is elected.

So Assange is part of the great right wing conspiracy too? It seemed a tad delusional when you were ranting that the FBI and the State department and intelligence inspectors general were in on it, but Assange is in on it too?

That's one helluva vast conspiracy.

Why do you imagine they'll stop when she's elected? Or are you in on it too?

Goddammit, you caught me! How in the hell did you know? Yes, I'm in on it. My code sign is "hot hunk". What is yours? BTW: I just follow orders.
 
Why do you imagine they'll stop when she's elected?

Don't you remember the history of Bill Clinton's Presidency? Everyone from everywhere was attacking him while he ran for President, then afterward everything stopped.
 
What drives this massive Hillary Clinton butthurt that seems so pervasive among conservatives, misogynists, and others?
 
What drives this massive Hillary Clinton butthurt that seems so pervasive among conservatives, misogynists, and others?
Not to mention progressives.

I would say the fact that he has traded on being "from the House of Clinton" her whole political life (i.e. 2000-present) but everybody pretends she is the "most qualified candidate ever" even though she would be somewhere in the midfield. Also the fact that she has shown terrible judgment (emails), is a compulsive liar even about trivial things (Tuzla, origin of her name etc.) and triangulates her positions (Keystone XL and many other issues) so much that the question is if there is any core there at all.
 
What drives this massive Hillary Clinton butthurt that seems so pervasive among conservatives, misogynists, and others?
Not to mention progressives.

I would say the fact that he has traded on being "from the House of Clinton" her whole political life (i.e. 2000-present) but everybody pretends she is the "most qualified candidate ever" even though she would be somewhere in the midfield. Also the fact that she has shown terrible judgment (emails), is a compulsive liar even about trivial things (Tuzla, origin of her name etc.) and triangulates her positions (Keystone XL and many other issues) so much that the question is if there is any core there at all.
Sounds like most politicians, which does not explain the massive butthurt for this specific politician.
 
What drives this massive Hillary Clinton butthurt that seems so pervasive among conservatives, misogynists, and others?
Not to mention progressives.

I would say the fact that he has traded on being "from the House of Clinton" her whole political life (i.e. 2000-present) but everybody pretends she is the "most qualified candidate ever" even though she would be somewhere in the midfield. Also the fact that she has shown terrible judgment (emails), is a compulsive liar even about trivial things (Tuzla, origin of her name etc.) and triangulates her positions (Keystone XL and many other issues) so much that the question is if there is any core there at all.

I think the triangulations and lying are only part of a larger theme that the Average Joe American has accepted. The theme is elitism. Hillary and other corporate Democrats abandoned thinking they are on the same level as everyone else. She thinks she can just tell lies and that she is so far above everyone else in intellect, they can't see it. It's very insulting to average Americans. I'd still rather vote for her than Trump if my vote counted.
 
What drives this massive Hillary Clinton butthurt that seems so pervasive among conservatives, misogynists, and others?


The real neat trick is that the right wingers have managed to make the left wingers hate her perhaps even more than they do.


According to conservatives and professional internet misogynists (not naming names) Hillary is slightly to the left of Chairman Mao, but now they've managed to create a narrative that she's somehow more right wing than her former boss Barry Goldwater.


She's at once the furthest left and furthest right candidate in American history!
 
Sounds like most politicians, which does not explain the massive butthurt for this specific politician.
I guess you could say she is a politician with these unfavorable attriutes turned up to 11.
giphy.gif

Also, when she is trying to be "a regular person" she might land in the uncanny valley. Kind of like Romney.
uncanny-valley-1.jpg

bernie-or-hillary-robot-uprising.jpg
 
Sounds like most politicians, which does not explain the massive butthurt for this specific politician.
I guess you could say she is a politician with these unfavorable attriutes turned up to 11.
giphy.gif

Also, when she is trying to be "a regular person" she might land in the uncanny valley.
uncanny-valley-1.jpg
Come on, is she really worse than Ted Cruz, or Mitt Romney or Donald Trump - none of whom come close to this massive butthurt. Hell, even Nixon did not generate such massive butthurt. No, it has to be something else. I wonder what is different about Hillary Clinton and all those others. Hmmmm.
 
I would say the fact that he has traded on being "from the House of Clinton" her whole political life (i.e. 2000-present) but everybody pretends she is the "most qualified candidate ever" even though she would be somewhere in the midfield.

She's a former US Senator, was Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013, was the First Lady of the United States of America from 1993 to 2001, and First Lady of Arkansas from 1983 to 1992. She has served on the Board of Directors of WalMart, TCBY, and a few legal funds and advocacy groups. Her first job in Washington D.C. was as a congressional legal counsel during the Watergate years. She has excelled in both the public sector and the private sector.

If all ^this^ puts her somewhere in the midfield, I'd love to see you list the qualifications of someone you think was top tier when he was his party's nominee.
 
What drives this massive Hillary Clinton butthurt that seems so pervasive among conservatives, misogynists, and others?


The real neat trick is that the right wingers have managed to make the left wingers hate her perhaps even more than they do.


According to conservatives and professional internet misogynists (not naming names) Hillary is slightly to the left of Chairman Mao, but now they've managed to create a narrative that she's somehow more right wing than her former boss Barry Goldwater.


She's at once the furthest left and furthest right candidate in American history!

It is emerging that she was highly in favor of using violence in Libya.

She is a hawk. So is Obama.

In terms of this constant need for more and more US violence, she is neither right nor left.

She is insane.
 
Everything isn't about Clinton and loyalty to her.

Was the US seriously in danger from her entitled thinking to private emails? If so, she should get in trouble, if it was also illegal.

People who give their lives in the cause of American security just dont matter. Whether they be the poor kids you send into war or CIA agents. Who else would get away with this?

Did Clinton’s Emails Expose CIA Agents?


These are facts. You can look at the source documents yourself. This is not opinion, conjecture, or rumor. Hillary Clinton transmitted the names of American intelligence officials via her unclassified email.
 
Obama did not know what he was getting into,and he did pretty good.Clinton knows what she is getting in to.She will do just fine.2008 was caused,in part,by testicles.Men take risks more than woman.Look at Iceland's recovery:woman.My big sister could run anything,if family did not come first.But,she still is active city politics.For all her baggage,I will still vote for the Hilldabeast. Cause I ant' a scard of no smart woman.
 
Obama did not know what he was getting into,and he did pretty good.Clinton knows what she is getting in to.She will do just fine.2008 was caused,in part,by testicles.Men take risks more than woman.Look at Iceland's recovery:woman.My big sister could run anything,if family did not come first.But,she still is active city politics.For all her baggage,I will still vote for the Hilldabeast. Cause I ant' a scard of no smart woman.

The Falklands was because a woman was trying to prove she had balls.
 
Come on, is she really worse than Ted Cruz, or Mitt Romney or Donald Trump - none of whom come close to this massive butthurt.
I did edit to add Mitt Romney as a comparison even before seeing your post. But Cruz and certainly Trump are very different. Cruz is an ideologue whose campaign nobody would accuse of being "Camp Weathervane". And while Trump turns things up to 11 (or perhaps even 12) they are different things than what people especially dislike about politicians.
Hell, even Nixon did not generate such massive butthurt.
In 1968, why would anybody be butthurt about Nixon?
No, it has to be something else. I wonder what is different about Hillary Clinton and all those others. Hmmmm.
I know what you think is different. I just don't agree that that plays a role. I think her gender actually helps her. If she was born Hildebrand Rodham instead of Hillary he'd never be even a US senator.
 
Back
Top Bottom