March for women. A message from Conservatives

[whichphilosophy]

There's a real-life story of a man who suffered a brain injury and could not remember anything longer than 10 minutes.

(I pause, take a sip of wine and contemplate the workings of a mind who has been reading 398 posts on a topic and still doesn't know what it is about. Fascinating.)

The March.
Was nuanced.
It was for many many different reasons.
As we've said.
Over the last 398 posts.
Many many reasons.

Any list I give you will yield either you telling me I'm wrong about the march I attended, or picking one reason and falsely assigning it to something it never was.

It was to protest policies, not a man. Some have been going on for a long time but are still urgent. Some are policies that the new government (President, House, Senate) have vowed to pursue.

If these speeches before Madonna are on I can check them on Youtube

You,
Should probably not spend any time watching the videos of the speeches at the event, nor reading online the lists of "Why I Marched."
Because you will not comprehend them.
Save precious minutes of your life and go play golf instead.

Democrats and Republicans always work together but there's no harm with Outreach. I take it you found Madonna's speech of thinking (not threatening) about blowing up the White House but that is still 'a bit over the top.'

I found it over-the-top, out of synch with the rest of the day and unnecessary.

Why is this timed with end of the US election?

 

[whichphilosophy]

What are they protesting about then?

Now you are doubling down on ignorance. And yet, that same admitted ignorance does not stop your persistent nonsense and insistence on what women ought to say and do in protests. Wow.

I'm aware that there are many civil rights groups but the timing of these events raised suspicions (well mine at least).

 

[Arctish]

Why is this timed with end of the US election?

If you do a bit of research you might find the answer. I'm sure someone who helped organize the Women's March posed something somewhere about it.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Why is this timed with end of the US election?

If you do a bit of research you might find the answer. I'm sure someone who helped organize the Women's March posed something somewhere about it.

So you don't know the answer.

 

[Arctish]

If you do a bit of research you might find the answer. I'm sure someone who helped organize the Women's March posed something somewhere about it.

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

 

[laughing dog]

Now you are doubling down on ignorance. And yet, that same admitted ignorance does not stop your persistent nonsense and insistence on what women ought to say and do in protests. Wow.

I'm aware that there are many civil rights groups but the timing of these events raised suspicions (well mine at least).

Not only are you telling women who and what to protest, but when. Wow.

 

[whichphilosophy]

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

Are there any video's or articles.

 

[whichphilosophy]

I'm aware that there are many civil rights groups but the timing of these events raised suspicions (well mine at least).

Not only are you telling women who and what to protest, but when. Wow.

An observation is not an instruction.

- - - Updated - - -

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

They were timed for just after the election to last 100 days. What is the purpose of these marches. Is that question permitted?

 

[LordKiran]

Not only are you telling women who and what to protest, but when. Wow.

An observation is not an instruction.

- - - Updated - - -

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

They were timed for just after the election to last 100 days. What is the purpose of these marches. Is that question permitted?

If you already have the answer to your question then just say it. Don't waste people's time by hiding behind a disingenuous suite of questions designed to try and herd the opposing party into your conclusions. Just say it and explain why you came to that conclusion. Your seeming inability to do so just comes off as coy, weak, and cowardly.

 

[whichphilosophy]

An observation is not an instruction.

- - - Updated - - -

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

They were timed for just after the election to last 100 days. What is the purpose of these marches. Is that question permitted?

If you already have the answer to your question then just say it. Don't waste people's time by hiding behind a disingenuous suite of questions designed to try and herd the opposing party into your conclusions. Just say it and explain why you came to that conclusion. Your seeming inability to do so just comes off as coy, weak, and cowardly.

The timing of these demonstrations calls for an answer. No one has given a clear answer unless I missed it. I once called it a protest against the election results. Then why protest against the results if the process is democratic, though the system imperfect. The UK system is less perfect where the Tories a majority of seats with only around 36% of the vote.

 

[LordKiran]

An observation is not an instruction.

- - - Updated - - -

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

They were timed for just after the election to last 100 days. What is the purpose of these marches. Is that question permitted?

If you already have the answer to your question then just say it. Don't waste people's time by hiding behind a disingenuous suite of questions designed to try and herd the opposing party into your conclusions. Just say it and explain why you came to that conclusion. Your seeming inability to do so just comes off as coy, weak, and cowardly.

What was the answer if it was not a protest against the election results.

Scroll up? Other people already seem to have this covered.

 

[whichphilosophy]

An observation is not an instruction.

- - - Updated - - -

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

They were timed for just after the election to last 100 days. What is the purpose of these marches. Is that question permitted?

If you already have the answer to your question then just say it. Don't waste people's time by hiding behind a disingenuous suite of questions designed to try and herd the opposing party into your conclusions. Just say it and explain why you came to that conclusion. Your seeming inability to do so just comes off as coy, weak, and cowardly.

What was the answer if it was not a protest against the election results.

Scroll up? Other people already seem to have this covered.

Do you have one example?

 

[LordKiran]

An observation is not an instruction.

- - - Updated - - -

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

They were timed for just after the election to last 100 days. What is the purpose of these marches. Is that question permitted?

If you already have the answer to your question then just say it. Don't waste people's time by hiding behind a disingenuous suite of questions designed to try and herd the opposing party into your conclusions. Just say it and explain why you came to that conclusion. Your seeming inability to do so just comes off as coy, weak, and cowardly.

What was the answer if it was not a protest against the election results.

Scroll up? Other people already seem to have this covered.

Do you have one example?

You have a working mouse scroll, you're fine.

Also, a question in retrospect: Who decides what the purpose is? You? If so then it seems pointless to ask me to provide examples seeing as you've already made up your mind.

 

[LordKiran]

There's a real-life story of a man who suffered a brain injury and could not remember anything longer than 10 minutes.

(I pause, take a sip of wine and contemplate the workings of a mind who has been reading 398 posts on a topic and still doesn't know what it is about. Fascinating.)

The March.
Was nuanced.
It was for many many different reasons.
As we've said.
Over the last 398 posts.
Many many reasons.

Any list I give you will yield either you telling me I'm wrong about the march I attended, or picking one reason and falsely assigning it to something it never was.

It was to protest policies, not a man. Some have been going on for a long time but are still urgent. Some are policies that the new government (President, House, Senate) have vowed to pursue.

If these speeches before Madonna are on I can check them on Youtube

You,
Should probably not spend any time watching the videos of the speeches at the event, nor reading online the lists of "Why I Marched."
Because you will not comprehend them.
Save precious minutes of your life and go play golf instead.

Democrats and Republicans always work together but there's no harm with Outreach. I take it you found Madonna's speech of thinking (not threatening) about blowing up the White House but that is still 'a bit over the top.'

I found it over-the-top, out of synch with the rest of the day and unnecessary.

Rhea, it's because you're stuck in a box of WP's making. Since he never actually defined the terms of how one decides "What the march was about." and since nobody called him on this, he's more or less free to dictate the terms and change them at will.

 

[laughing dog]

Not only are you telling women who and what to protest, but when. Wow.

An observation is not an instruction.

The fact these women are protesting at all bothers you. The fact they are not protesting what you think they ought to be protesting bothers you. And now, the fact they protested when they did bothers you. It would be fascinating if it were not so pathetically lame.

 

[whichphilosophy]

An observation is not an instruction.

- - - Updated - - -

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

They were timed for just after the election to last 100 days. What is the purpose of these marches. Is that question permitted?

If you already have the answer to your question then just say it. Don't waste people's time by hiding behind a disingenuous suite of questions designed to try and herd the opposing party into your conclusions. Just say it and explain why you came to that conclusion. Your seeming inability to do so just comes off as coy, weak, and cowardly.

What was the answer if it was not a protest against the election results.

Scroll up? Other people already seem to have this covered.

Do you have one example?

You have a working mouse scroll, you're fine.

Also, a question in retrospect: Who decides what the purpose is? You? If so then it seems pointless to ask me to provide examples seeing as you've already made up your mind.

Show the examples then. I may even surprise you by agreeing to some

 

[LordKiran]

An observation is not an instruction.

- - - Updated - - -

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

They were timed for just after the election to last 100 days. What is the purpose of these marches. Is that question permitted?

If you already have the answer to your question then just say it. Don't waste people's time by hiding behind a disingenuous suite of questions designed to try and herd the opposing party into your conclusions. Just say it and explain why you came to that conclusion. Your seeming inability to do so just comes off as coy, weak, and cowardly.

What was the answer if it was not a protest against the election results.

Scroll up? Other people already seem to have this covered.

Do you have one example?

You have a working mouse scroll, you're fine.

Also, a question in retrospect: Who decides what the purpose is? You? If so then it seems pointless to ask me to provide examples seeing as you've already made up your mind.

Show the examples then. I may even surprise you by agreeing to some

Tell you what. I will do that when you can clearly outline what it is that indicates "What the march is about."

 

[Crazy Eddie]

An observation is not an instruction.

- - - Updated - - -

So you don't know the answer.

I know why women I know personally marched. I know what the people who organized the Women's March said about its purpose and their goals. I know what Rhea said about her first-hand experiences there. But no one can impart knowledge to you when you won't listen to what they're telling you, and I'm not going to try spoon feeding it to you, either.

If you truly want to know what the Women's March was all about and why it took place the Saturday after the Inauguration, you can start by re-reading what Rhea has already posted. Then you can follow the links people have provided. Then come back with better questions, because the ones you keep asking have already been answered.

They were timed for just after the election to last 100 days. What is the purpose of these marches. Is that question permitted?

If you already have the answer to your question then just say it. Don't waste people's time by hiding behind a disingenuous suite of questions designed to try and herd the opposing party into your conclusions. Just say it and explain why you came to that conclusion. Your seeming inability to do so just comes off as coy, weak, and cowardly.

What was the answer if it was not a protest against the election results.

Scroll up? Other people already seem to have this covered.

Do you have one example?

Well someone else already posted a link to a website which you apparently

So here it is again for your convenience:

1. What happens next?

Please see our IN GRATITUDE page for some thoughts we'd like to share with you. We will announce more on what will happen next very soon, so please stay tuned. We are not going away.

2. Is The Women's March on London an anti-Trump march? Why should I march against the president of another country?
The Women's March on London is not an anti-Trump march per se. Though Donald Trump's election was arguably the catalyst for a grassroots collective of women to come together and formulate the idea of the Women's March, its objective is to protect and stand up for fundamental values that have recently come under attack namely human rights, equality, dignity, safety and health. We are inviting anyone with an interest in preserving and defending those rights, to take part and show their opposition.

3. Why march on January 21st?
We are marching on this date - a global day of action - in solidarity with people in the United States as well as people all over the world whose human rights are being threatened. The loss of human rights is a global issue that requires a global response. If fundamental human rights are being questioned then we believe we must take action and defend them; that's exactly what we are aiming to do with this march.

4. Why call yourselves Women's March on ...?
The march was given its name by those who started this initiative in Washington DC. In solidarity, we adopted the name as the march is spearheaded BY women, but importantly is FOR everyone.

5. Is the march about women's rights?
The Women's March on London is not specifically about women's rights only. However, women's rights are human rights and for that we will gladly take to the street and march.

6. It seems like you are marching for so many different issues, none of which have anything to do with women's rights at all?

We disagree with the idea that racism, homophobia, transphobia, Islamophobia, disability prejudice, poverty, and the environment aren't 'women's issues.' They are intertwined with women's rights because a significant proportion of women are people of colour, trans, lesbian, Muslim, disabled, economically suffering, and living on this earth.

7. Is this march only for women?
No, the march is open to people of any gender.

I do believe this answers all of your questions, yes?

 

[Rhea]

It was to protest policies, not a man. Some have been going on for a long time but are still urgent. Some are policies that the new government (President, House, Senate) have vowed to pursue.

Why is this timed with end of the US election?

Your really can't figure that out from the information available? Really?

Some are policies that the new government (President, House, Senate) have vowed to pursue.
There's a story about a straw and a camel's back.

 

[Rhea]

The fact these women are protesting at all bothers you. The fact they are not protesting what you think they ought to be protesting bothers you. And now, the fact they protested when they did bothers you. It would be fascinating if it were not so pathetically lame.

Quoted for Truth.

WP, all of your questions have been answered.
Yes, the answers were given in good faith assuming it was a genuine question and
yes, you proved it was not a genuine question but an attempted Socratic lecture.

But your lecture doesn't mean anything when you don't know what you're talking about.

If you already have the answer to your question then just say it. Don't waste people's time by hiding behind a disingenuous suite of questions designed to try and herd the opposing party into your conclusions. Just say it and explain why you came to that conclusion. Your seeming inability to do so just comes off as coy, weak, and cowardly.

Quoted for more Truth.

Even though we've all seen for pages that you have no actual curiosity or desire to learn anything, we nevertheless, in good faith, gave you actual answers. You think perhaps that you're winning at us not realizing how clever you are by asking the same question again and again and ignoring the answers.

But that's not clever. It's pathetic. If you actually had a curiosity and a desire to learn something and a willingness to form your opinion _from_ the answers instead prior to the answers, you'd have reached the point of understanding already.


Please don't debase yourself with further repeats of the same question asking for information you've already been given.