• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

What is the actual free will humans have?

Ever rest in a warm nutrient bath. Really hard to have thoughts, Just more and more anxiety, perhaps sleepful feelings even sleep. So one thing that produces thought are sensory inputs. You can do similar experiments using drugs or other approaches and find other things needed to produce thoughts. So, broadly speaking inputs are required to produce ideas, How are those ideas or thoughts in man different from those of the Manta. Well man can conduct experiments and find what produces decisions, ideas, in Mantas.

One of my specialties was the study of learning in African mouth breeders like tilapia, and oscars. There we found the occurrence of three nearly identical events of importance to the fish produces association, learning.

Drop one meal worm into the tank after the subject nosed against a test tube and it withdrew. a second and it withdrew again. A third time and it descended to the far end of the tank, it's chromatophores darkened, then after a moment the subject would begin incessantly nosing the test tube getting meal worms until it was satiated. It had learned. We had found an very strong emotional component to learning associated with autonomic behavior coupled with association of worm with nose push on tube.

And there are Rats, and Cats, and Possum, and macaque, all somewhat different in their approach to acquiring new behavior through various learning paradigms. All demonstrating species specific characteristis in learning behavior.

I'm pretty sure there are ample other areas of behavioral study that are just as enlightening.

Are we pretending to know something. No. We are accumulating a catalog of behaviors across species related to learning, motivation, sensation, perception, parenting, etc. We are not putting some rational constraint on these. We are studying similarities, differences, in behavior habitat and nervous systems so we can underestand learning, thinking, the emergence of various creativities, etc.

The human brain is at the end of a long line of adaptations of vertebrate NS. So it makes no sense to impose some preconception based on personal belief as to the modes and capabilities except those that can be repeated and compared with the work of others.
 
Ever rest in a warm nutrient bath. Really hard to have thoughts, Just more and more anxiety, perhaps sleepful feelings even sleep. So one thing that produces thought are sensory inputs.

That is about as helpful as saying "evolution produces thoughts".

I am asking for the objective process neurons use to create not only a thought but a "being" that experiences the thought.
 
If a decision is made based on an examination of ideas it can in no way be called a reflexive decision. What reflex examines ideas?

I said that it is functional decision making.

You think labels are magic. I know.

In your own words, you that nothing is known.

You say that nothing is known yet you claim to know that autonomous consciousness orders the brain.

There lies your magic.

But this requires actually thinking about something and not merely placing magic labels on things.

You are not thinking. You do not consider experiments, results, the evidence or the analysis of the researchers who do the work.

That is not thinking.


How can a brain have evolutionary mechanisms to mull over ideas?

The brain came first and ideas in language didn't come until much later.

The brain could not have evolved to deal with something that didn't even exist.

It is absurd to imagine the mulling over ideas is a reflex of some kind. Completely irrational.

That's not thinking.

The Universe came first. Then matter/energy coalesced into objects, stars, galaxies, planets, then life formed on this planet and evolved into the present day order of things....
 
You think labels are magic. I know.

In your own words, you that nothing is known.

You say that nothing is known yet you claim to know that autonomous consciousness orders the brain.

There lies your magic.

This has been going on a long time.

If all you can manage are pathetic lies and distortions you are a complete waste of time.

I have said over and over, nothing is known about the activity in the brain that results in conscious experience. We have no idea how consciousness arises from brain activity.

All kinds of things are happening.

There is electrical and chemical activity. There is magnetic activity.

There is also the flow of blood.

There are also most likely quantum effects of matter involved, if we can believe physicists like Freeman Dyson, even potentially completely unknown quantum effects.

So we do know two things.

1. A lot of stuff is happening

2. We have no idea what of any of it is producing consciousness no less how it is producing it

We also know beyond doubt the daily experience of our own consciousness.

Something you somehow think is unrelated to consciousness.
 
You think labels are magic. I know.

In your own words, you that nothing is known.

You say that nothing is known yet you claim to know that autonomous consciousness orders the brain.

There lies your magic.

This has been going on a long time.

If all you can manage are pathetic lies and distortions you are a complete waste of time.

I have said over and over, nothing is known about the activity in the brain that results in conscious experience. We have no idea how consciousness arises from brain activity.

All kinds of things are happening.

There is electrical and chemical activity. There is magnetic activity.

There is also the flow of blood.

There are also most likely quantum effects of matter involved, if we can believe physicists like Freeman Dyson, even potentially completely unknown quantum effects.

So we do know two things.

1. A lot of stuff is happening

2. We have no idea what of any of it is producing consciousness no less how it is producing it

We also know beyond doubt the daily experience of our own consciousness.

Something you somehow think is unrelated to consciousness.

You really must stop generalising from your own case. I'm prepared to accept that you might well know nothing, but the state of the art is moving forward at a pace that is positively bracing. While it is undeniably the case that the methodological constraints of science, very properly, make a scientific unification of mental and physical events impossible, even if they are two sides of the same coin. This is only because of the uniquely privileged nature of the first person perspective. Fortunately philosophy, working with a slightly different tool kit, can do the metaphysical heavy lifting.
 
This has been going on a long time.

If all you can manage are pathetic lies and distortions you are a complete waste of time.

I have said over and over, nothing is known about the activity in the brain that results in conscious experience. We have no idea how consciousness arises from brain activity.

All kinds of things are happening.

There is electrical and chemical activity. There is magnetic activity.

There is also the flow of blood.

There are also most likely quantum effects of matter involved, if we can believe physicists like Freeman Dyson, even potentially completely unknown quantum effects.

So we do know two things.

1. A lot of stuff is happening

2. We have no idea what of any of it is producing consciousness no less how it is producing it

We also know beyond doubt the daily experience of our own consciousness.

Something you somehow think is unrelated to consciousness.

You really must stop generalising from your own case. I'm prepared to accept that you might well know nothing, but the state of the art is moving forward at a pace that is positively bracing. While it is undeniably the case that the methodological constraints of science, very properly, make a scientific unification of mental and physical events impossible, even if they are two sides of the same coin. This is only because of the uniquely privileged nature of the first person perspective. Fortunately philosophy, working with a slightly different tool kit, can do the metaphysical heavy lifting.

This is non-responsive.

As if you can't even read.
 
There must be a more dignified way of saying 'I don't understand'?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DBT
Mr Untermensche, your position is irrational and therefore untenable for the reasons already provided by many posters, so why persist? If that is what you want to believe, fine, but why keep arguing for autonomous consciousness?
 
Mr Untermensche, your position is irrational and therefore untenable for the reasons already provided by many posters, so why persist? If that is what you want to believe, fine, but why keep arguing for autonomous consciousness?

I can read your claims.

They are based on nothing. You have nothing. No understanding.

Autonomous consciousness is more believable than reflexive brain caring about ideas.

Your "position" is laughable.

You have nothing but cognitive dissonance to how little you actually understand.
 
I have more education in brain physiology than you.

I have more understanding of the current research than you.

All you can do is ape the ideas of others without any understanding of what you're saying.

You think saying the magic words "autonomous consciousness" is supposed to mean something. It doesn't.
 
I present idea after idea.

I have no interest in discussing "me".

If you present an interesting idea I might comment on it.
 
Back
Top Bottom