• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

"Black Lives Matter" shows their true racist colors yet again

Derec

Contributor
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
28,983
Location
Atlanta, GA
Basic Beliefs
atheist
Black Lives Matter meetings run afoul of library's policy

USA Today said:
Library officials have told Nashville's chapter of the Black Lives Matter movement that meetings restricting those who attend by race aren't allowed on public property. The decision has outraged Black Lives Matter members. But Nashville Public Library officials said they’re following a library policy that specifies all meetings at their facilities must be open to the public and news media.
[...]
“Due to white supremacy in our local government, this week’s BLM General Body Meeting location has changed,” a notice posted on the Nashville chapter of Black Lives Matter’s Facebook page reads. The notice says the group’s meetings are “open to black and non-black people of color only."

"We were surprised about it, but we shouldn't have been," Crutchfield said. "We kind of know the history about how this goes in this country. … It's definitely something we want to make public to tell people what's going on in the city."
Black Lives Matter has a racist meeting policy, but when called out on it they blame "white supremacy".
Shame on UMC for allowing them to host their racist "no whites allowed" meetings.
 
Isn't "Black Lives Matter" one of those "groups" like Anonymous, where you can claim the title without any actual group membership in common with others who do?
 
Isn't "Black Lives Matter" one of those "groups" like Anonymous, where you can claim the title without any actual group membership in common with others who do?

Well the whole point of Anonymous is that they are supposed to be anonymous, but #BLMers have local chapters and stuff.
 
Isn't "Black Lives Matter" one of those "groups" like Anonymous, where you can claim the title without any actual group membership in common with others who do?

Well the whole point of Anonymous is that they are supposed to be anonymous, but #BLMers have local chapters and stuff.

Are the chapters affiliated with one another through some sort of governing body or collective? Or can any random group of black friends declare themselves the local chapter of BLM and voice whatever views they have and call it BLM's?
 
You're wrong Derec. BLM is an organization that doesn't require that one be black to participate. The group in Nashville obviously didn't understand this.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/a-year-inside-the-black-lives-matter-movement-204982/


If BLM being described as nonviolent sounds strange to you, then you’re probably watching too much Fox News. The movement has been wildly misunderstood partly because of how it’s caricatured and demonized by right-wing media. “We absolutely don’t consider Black Lives Matter a hate group,” says Heidi Beirich, the head of the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence project, which tracks hate groups. “Black Lives Matter is not a racist group; anyone can join. It’s a movement to expand civil rights for the oppressed in this society. It’s a peaceful protest against oppression. There’s simply no equivalence between Black Lives Matter and a hate group. It’s truly offensive to equate them.”

Perhaps, Derec, you should learn more about this movement before making unsubstantiated claims.

And, maybe since the overwhelming majority of violent racist attacks in the past year or two were committed by white people on the far right, maybe you would consider starting a thread about that type of racism, which is certainly far more damaging than a small group of black people in Nashville, who don't understand the nature of the movement that they want to join. Why is it that you label every tiny micro aggression committed by a black person as "racist"? I've seen you criticize black folks who were angry over a minor micro aggression committed by a white person. Why the double standard?

And, to help you better understand what black folks have put up with in the US, I strongly suggest that you read the outstanding book, "White Rage", by Carol Anderson. It's a fascinating read, and extremely educational.
 
You're wrong Derec. BLM is an organization that doesn't require that one be black to participate. The group in Nashville obviously didn't understand this.
It isn't the first time #BLM pulled something like this.

I've been following them since 2014 and the Ferguson and Baltimore riots. They always think any police shooting of a black person is "murder" and that the cop is a "racist".


If BLM being described as nonviolent sounds strange to you, then you’re probably watching too much Fox News.
Remember this?

Sure, it might be on Fox News, but it did happen.
I think it is that CNN and MSNBC are painting too rosy picture of the movement that Fox stands out. Do you remember this piece of CNN misinformation?

CNN claimed the sister (or a an armed thug who was shot by police in Milwaukee sparking violent #BLM riots) was calling for peace. But in reality, she was saying that the rioters should burn down the suburbs, not black neighborhoods.

Perhaps, Derec, you should learn more about this movement before making unsubstantiated claims.
I know plenty about the movement, thank you very much. We have been discussing it since the Michael Brown megathread on here. Remember?

And, maybe since the overwhelming majority of violent racist attacks in the past year or two were committed by white people on the far right,
Have they been? Or is it that the media emphasizes race when a crime is white on black, but neglects to mention race when it's black on white?
This happened recently.
An elderly man died of injuries after he was pushed off a bus. Now police have made an arrest
Note that because the victim is white and the perpetrator black, CNN is not mentioning the races involved. But when it's the other way around, race is pretty much the only thing talked about.

maybe you would consider starting a thread about that type of racism, which is certainly far more damaging than a small group of black people in Nashville, who don't understand the nature of the movement that they want to join.
I think they understand it better than you.

Why is it that you label every tiny micro aggression committed by a black person as "racist"?
This is not a "microaggression". It's at least a kiloaggression. :)
It's "no whites allowed". If it was the other way around, it would be considered a big deal. Microaggressions are things like professors correcting black students grammar or pro-Trump chalkings on sidewalks on campus.

And, to help you better understand what black folks have put up with in the US, I strongly suggest that you read the outstanding book, "White Rage", by Carol Anderson. It's a fascinating read, and extremely educational.
I understand there was a lot of anti-black racism in the past. These days, black racism is downplayed (or outright denied to exist) and white racist exaggerated.
 
Are the chapters affiliated with one another through some sort of governing body or collective? Or can any random group of black friends declare themselves the local chapter of BLM and voice whatever views they have and call it BLM's?

I don't know, but I do know nobody from the national leadership (like Patrice Cullors or that weird guy with the vest) condemned the Nashville chapter.
 
I've seen "Black Lives Matter" pull some pretty crazy moves, but I don't think we can blame the whole of "BLM" for it, because I don't think they are in any way centralized.
 
Back
Top Bottom