• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Proposed legislation could legalize child marriage in Tennessee

ZiprHead

Looney Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
46,519
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Don't be a dick.

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (WMC) - Some Tennessee Republicans want to make common law marriage legal. But the bill being pushed through the legislature this week doesn’t have any age requirements and opponents say that paves the way for allowing child marriage.

Twenty-four Tennessee Republicans are sponsoring this legislation and right now it is making headlines around the world. Newsweek, The Hill and The Daily Mail in the U.K. have all written about it, Twitter is all abuzz about it, and all eyes are on the Volunteer State as people wonder if the state’s lawmakers are about to legalize child marriage.

State Rep. Tom Leatherwood, the Republican from Shelby County who represents Arlington, sponsored House Bill 233, introducing it in the Children and Family Affairs Subcommittee on April 23. The legislation is designed to legalize common law marriage in Tennessee as a way to push back against the LGBTQ movement.

“I’ve seen a change in the tide, and if there’s any hostility, it’s against those people who do believe marriage comes from God, not from government and do believe it’s between a man and a woman,” said Leatherwood.

“What’s the age limit on this bill?” inquired Rep. Mike Stewart, a Democrat from Nashville, “My concern would be you’re changing the law and we have strict age limits on marriage in Tennessee and I don’t think we want to get away from that.”

“So your current language does not have an age limit? You’re aware our current law does have an age limit and you know what that age limit is?” Rep. Torrey Harris of Memphis asked Leatherwood.

Current Tennessee law states you can get married as young as 17 if you have parental consent. Critics worry House Bill 233, if passed, would pave the way for child marriage and child sex abuse.
 
It will be interesting to see who pops in here to defend child marriages.

How, might I ask, is this law aligned to strike against LGBTQ, though? Or am I going to have to find the text and do a full read?

Please don't make me find the text and do a full read ._.
 
It will be interesting to see who pops in here to defend child marriages.

How, might I ask, is this law aligned to strike against LGBTQ, though? Or am I going to have to find the text and do a full read?

Please don't make me find the text and do a full read ._.
It's a work-around for pedophiles. See Ted Nugent.
 
My guess is it is another fool with a pencil who instead of recognizing the error in how the law is written will double down and make it a fight between Tennessee and Disney.
 
How, might I ask, is this law aligned to strike against LGBTQ, though? Or am I going to have to find the text and do a full read?
The bill makes allowances for common law marriages, but only for heterosexual couples.
 
How, might I ask, is this law aligned to strike against LGBTQ, though? Or am I going to have to find the text and do a full read?
The bill makes allowances for common law marriages, but only for heterosexual couples.

That still isn't a strike against LGBTQ. Obergefell v. Hodges required states to license and recognize same-sex marriage. Making it so that people don't need a license or registration doesn't mean the state is allowed to not recognize same-sex marriage. They are sooooo stupid. :ROFLMAO:
 
It will be interesting to see who pops in here to defend child marriages.

How, might I ask, is this law aligned to strike against LGBTQ, though? Or am I going to have to find the text and do a full read?

Please don't make me find the text and do a full read ._.
It's a work-around for pedophiles. See Ted Nugent.
Ugh... I'll repeat my refrain from the threads in PD on determinism/free will:

Anyone who holds a will to hurt children -- and the desire for such an asymmetrical sexual relationship absolutely hurts the child -- ought direct that will so powerful as to override all moral sensibilities to kill themselves.

See Jeffery Epstein.


Sorry, kinda went off there... Lots of powerful emotions on that front.
 
How, might I ask, is this law aligned to strike against LGBTQ, though? Or am I going to have to find the text and do a full read?
The bill makes allowances for common law marriages, but only for heterosexual couples.

That still isn't a strike against LGBTQ. Obergefell v. Hodges required states to license and recognize same-sex marriage. Making it so that people don't need a license or registration doesn't mean the state is allowed to not recognize same-sex marriage. They are sooooo stupid. :ROFLMAO:
See, what they'll do is just remove all licensure offices from the state so that only straight people can get married by making it only possible through the common law fork.

I think they want a second crack, using the Trump court.
 
It will be interesting to see who pops in here to defend child marriages.

How, might I ask, is this law aligned to strike against LGBTQ, though? Or am I going to have to find the text and do a full read?

Please don't make me find the text and do a full read ._.

Marriage = one man + one woman.
 
Back
Top Bottom