Recent content by Jason the Rationalist

Iga Wyrwal. That expression on her face absolutely does it for me. Little bit cheeky, little bit naughty. Gorgeous.

Darya Scherbakova

:lol::lol: :lol:

All these tubes. It wants me to slip it a length. Ow, fuck, burney. Oh so you like it rough do you? I may have drifted into NSFW territory there. Rather than pull it I'll await.

Once we stick a dress on him this remake of Mary Poppins is going to work. Now sing spooonful of sugar like you're in love.

That's completely fucked up and really just so sad. I can't see any other way of looking at it. Reality isn't important or the quality of people's lives it seems - its what people might be saying about the organization. I tell you, they've been saying what they think about the organization for...

Is it a case of finding a good way to put across the message that they may be victims of their own ignorance? To use that as the starting point?

This is more like it. I've been lying in A&E for hours waiting for some service.

If a white person makes the statement that only white people are welcome in a particular group, that is different from saying that black people are not welcome in that group since those not welcome - black people - have been specifically identified, you could say targetted. The former position...

I'm not really sure what to make of that but it looks like a bit of a cop-out.

At that point the focus of the camera was directly on the crowd at the foot of the jump to the exclusion of pretty much everything else. I wouldn't normally care either but it caught my eye.

I would answer but I'm having thinking comprehension issues. Gorgeous!

I sometimes wonder why believers even bother to attempt to explain how/why their god's action or inaction, intervention or non-intervention can be justified since whatever happens can fall into one or the other bucket. ie. said god is just fine in doing or not doing, the problem is apparently...

The matter of whether or not there are Biblical contradictions could be regarded as an impasse, in a way it is similar to the problem of any posited god's existence. Believers will be comfortable, almost reassured, by the difficulties non-believers highlight with the material as it is used as...

That wasn't exactly what I was getting at but sure, why not? All part of your god's creation so are you going to speak on its behalf - I don't hear it saying a whole lot (but then I don't hear voices in my head) - and explain how/why its invalid?