Understood.
What I am saying it is by no means a reasonable substitute for compensation of a specific group because of a specific event.
It's kind of hard to make that equation when White men put their businesses in their wives names to reap contracts you seem to think is akin to reparations...
I am not too sure what to make of reparations, but I can say this.
Reparations is about compensation to Blacks because of slavery. A program like AA which historically benefited White women more than those designated by reparations, is by no means a substitute.
The TPM article that should be dismissed because TPM is a left wing site, sources Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal and God knows that is a left wing rag.
As the current two party system exists, a non vote for the Democrat means rewarding the party whose platform is obstruction and endless meaningless investigations of the opposing party President.
It happened to Clinton, and they are trying their best with Obama.
The same party who remembers...
Big Problem. I recall reading a WaPost article where some lobbyists were getting a return of $222 for every dollar spent. Loan Sharks don't come close in doing so well.
That is a great point specially since the widow, orphan, and taking care of the least of us, is directly from the mouth of who they think God; yet the same person who said not one thing about Gay being a sin.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.