• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Michael S. Pearl's latest activity

  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    You are wrong yet again. What you call "tone" is functional, observable, and operative and is what gives rise to reasonably positing...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Yet another misrepresentation by you. What I actually say is that for so long as an emotive full-account-possibility is viable...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    If you are familiar with emotion and, thereby, the emotive, if you have experienced the emotive as the prime generator for the manner of...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    False. I say that in the presence of the emotive, since the emotive - via observation and experience - is known as a possibility which...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    You are wrong. If the emotive is present - and it most definitely is and has most definitely has been established as present and actual...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Your above cited bizarre remark was in response to me saying that "your polemic is a possibility so long as the emotive possibility is...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    That is why your polemic is a possibility so long as the emotive possibility is not established as fully accounting for the manner of...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Emotive possibility was never included in your list of considered factors. Now you apparently feel the need to include it as if it were...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Yes it does. Figuratively speaking. It is just that you do not understand the relation between compartment-thinking, logic, and...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    I did not veto the possibility-to-actuality transformation. I guess you could say that logic vetoes it. Logically, emotion (viable...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    "Emotive" was NOT used as a veto. I said, "The emotive can subsume the polemic." Note the word can. That means it is possible for...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Paul's letter is reasonably interpreted as emotional, and that presents an emotive possibility which is sufficient to preclude...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    Emotive and polemic do not have to be mutually exclusive. They can both be possible together in the same context. They can both be...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    As I said, you make an actuality claim. Below, you provide further confirmation. The viable emotive possibility alone, for so long as...
  • M
    Michael S. Pearl replied to the thread Origins Of Christianity.
    If the "Methodological discipline" (and, thereby, the "public warrant") does not include taking into account of the distinction between...
Show older items
Back
Top Bottom